Mr. Walsh has lately taken the London Stores on The Bayle, and the house being now re-furbished and re-decorated, about fifty of his friends sat down last night in the large room to supper, under the presidency of Mr. George Hills. The viands were of excellent quality, and after the cloth was drawn the party enjoyed themselves with toast and song to a late hour.
Folkestone Observer 20-1-1866
Thursday January 19th:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N., J. Tolputt and A.M. Leith Esqs.
George Pledge was brought up in custody on a warrant issued the day previously charged with stealing a brooch.
Elizabeth, wife of William Pilcher, residing in Beach Street, said: On Christmas Day I missed a silver brooch from a mantelpiece in Mr. Faulkner`s Coffee House, in Seagate Street. Mr. Faulkner is my brother-in-law, and I was there that day on a visit. I put the brooch on the mantelpiece about an hour and a half before I missed it. A fortnight after I gave information to the police, and P.C. Smith brought the brooch to me last Friday. The brooch produced is the one I lost. The value of it is 10s.
Prisoner: It was on Christmas Day that you missed the brooch?
Witness: Yes.
Prisoner: Did you see me in the house on that day?
Witness: No, I did not.
Prisoner: Did you hear that the brooch had been offered for sale at the Prince Albert public house before or after you gave information to the police?
Witness: After I gave the information.
Prisoner: And who did you hear had offered it for sale there?
Witness: A man called James Jacobs.
Charles Frederick Mills, licensed victualler keeping the house called The London Stores, said: I know the prisoner perfectly well. About a fortnight ago he came to my house towards the evening and said “You don`t often pick up a thing such as this”. I said “What is it?”. He said “A brooch”, and added that he had picked it up in Mill Lane. He also further said that it was of no use to him, and asked me if I would buy it of him. He said that it would no doubt be cried, and in that case they could come to my place for it. I gave him half a crown for it. I told him if itv was cried I should give it up, or if anyone owned it I should give it up. The brooch produced is the same I bought of the prisoner.
Prisoner: Was there not someone with me on that day?
Witness: There was, but I did not know the man.
Macy Mills, the wife of the last witness, said: I received the brooch produced from my husband I believe the day after Christmas Day. On Friday afternoon last I gave it up to P.C. Smith.
The Clerk: Did you have a conversation with the prisoner at any time?
Witness: No, but I heard him say that he had picked it up in Mill Lane.
Prisoner: On Friday last did I not come and tell you that I had heard the brooch had been stolen?
Witness: You did.
Prisoner: And did I not tell you that I was going to give information to the police?
Witness: You did, and I told you it would be given directly they came for it.
P.C. Smith said: Last Monday week from information I received respecting a brooch having been stolen from Mr. Faulkner`s Coffee House, Seagate Street, I made inquiries, but could not trace it until last Friday, when I heard it had been sold to Mr. Mills, at the London Stores. I went there and received the brooch now produced from Mrs. Mills. I asked her who they bought it of, and she said George Pledge, the prisoner. The prisoner not attending on a summons, I apprehended him yesterday afternoon. I asked him where he got the brooch from, and he told me he picked it up in Mill Lane. I took the brooch to the prosecutrix, and she identified it as her property.
Prisoner: When did you first receive information about the brooch being lost?
Witness: Last Monday week.
Prisoner: On Monday last did you not go to the Prince Albert public house and make inquiries about the brooch?
Witness: I did not.
Prisoner: Who first told you where the brooch was?
Witness: You did yourself, on Friday last, and I then went to Mrs. Mills and got it.
Prisoner: Did I not ask you if you were looking for a man who had stolen a brooch?
Witness: You did.
Prisoner: Did I not tell you I could give you some information respecting it?
Witness: You did.
Prisoner: I told you where you could get the brooch, did I not?
Witness: You told me you had sold the brooch to Mr. Mills, at the London Stores.
Prisoner: Did I not tell you – now mark my words – that I had found it?
Witness: You did.
The charge was then read over to the prisoner and the usual caution given, when he pleaded Not Guilty.
The prisoner then made the following statement:- The man Jacobs – I don`t know that his name is Jacobs, but that is the name he is known by here – became acquainted with me at Mr. Faulkner`s Coffee House. He told me he was hard up, or something of that sort, and asked me to give him work, as at that time I was unloading a vessel in the harbour and giving hands employment. I gave him employment on board the ship, and he was there for three or four days. I believe the night after I paid him off he was locked up. The money it appears was stripped from him and he was turned out without a penny. He came to me again and wanted me to lend him some money. I did so. That was on the Saturday preceeding Christmas Day, and on the Sunday I asked him to come and have dinner with me, knowing he was rather short. He didn`t come till the following day – Christmas Day – when he came to the house where I lodged, and I told him I could not ask him to dinner as there was a wedding in the house, but he could get a very good dinner at Faulkner`s. He then went away, but where he went to I don`t know. I did not see any more of him until seven or eight o`clock at night, when I saw him sitting in the Prince Albert public house. I asked him how he got on for a dinner, or something like that, and he said he did pretty well, for he had found something to make up for dinner. I asked him what he had found and then he showed me the brooch. I asked him where he found it and he said “By the church”. I said “What church?” and he said “In Mill Lane”. I said “What a lucky fellow you are”, or something of that sort. He offered to sell it to me for half a crown. I told him he had better keep it for it would be sure to be cried, and he would get more for it. So he put it in his pocket, and I heard no more about it that night. The next day he came again to my house in South Street, and said he had had no breakfast and wanted me to give him a breakfast. We went for a walk together, and he then asked me if I could not sell the brooch for him as he had got no money to get a bed. He said he had offered it for sale himself to several parties, but they would not buy it of him. I said if he would come with me I would see if I could sell it. I went up to Mr. Mills and used the man`s words, and said that I had picked it up, as they, knowing me, I thought would buy it of me. I believed the man`s assertion that he had picked it up, and I told them that it would sure to be cried and that I would then want it again. I heard no more about it until last Friday, and I was sitting down in the Prince Albert public house when I heard that the constable had been there enquiring for this man. I then came up immediately and told the constable where to go and get the brooch. I told him the whole of the circumstances as they occurred. Until then I did not know the brooch had been stolen.
Thomas Clarke was then called by the prisoner, who said: I occupied the Prince Albert public house up to Friday last.
Prisoner: On Christmas Day did you have a brooch offered for sale in your house?
Witness: Yes.
Prisoner: Who offered it to you?
Witness: A man called Jacobs. I didn`t know who the man was – he was a stranger to me.
Prisoner: You heard him offer it to other persons besides yourself, did you not?
Witness: Yes, he offered it to two or three persons.
Prisoner: Was I in the house at the time?
Witness: I did not see you.
The Clerk: What kind of brooch was it?
Witness: The brooch produced is the same; I had it in my hands some little time looking at it.
The Clerk: Who was there in the room besides yourself when it was offered fro sale?
Witness: There were several there, but I did not know them.
The Clerk: Surely you can tell us one man?
Witness: I do not know their names.
Mr. Leith: Do you wish the magistrates to understand that you did not know one single person there?
Witness: I did not; I should know them again if I were to see them, but I do not know their names.
Prisoner: Did he say where he picked it up?
Witness: Yes, by the Old Church.
Capt. Kennicott: You are positive he said the Old Church?
Witness: Yes.
Prisoner remarked there were two other witnesses who could give evidence in his favour if they were sent for.
The constable said he had been for two he had named, but they had declined to come.
The Clerk said they could be summoned if the prisoner liked.
Prisoner said he was not in a position to do that,
The magistrates then committed the prisoner for trial at the next Quarter Sessions of the borough.
Prisoner asked for bail, and the magistrates consented – himself in £25 and two sureties of £25 each, which not being forthcoming he was removed in custody.
Southeastern Gazette 23-1-1866
Local News
At the Folkestone Petty Sessions on Thursday, a young
man named George Pledge was charged with stealing a silver brooch, value 10s.
6d., the of William Pilcher, on Christmas Day.
It seemed that Mrs. Pilcher, the wife of a painter, of
North Street, missed a brooch from a mantelpiece in an eating-house in
Seagate-street, kept by her father-in-law, on the above day. She suspected a
man named Jacobs, who had been in the room, and on the same evening he offered
the brooch for sale at the Albert public house. Next day the prisoner went to
the London Stores, Bayle Street, kept by Mr. Mills, where he sold the brooch
for 2s. 6d., saying he had found it.
The prisoner now said that Jacobs represented his
distress to him, and said he had found the brooch, and could not sell it. He
then, out of kindness to Jacobs, went with him to Mr. Mills, and sold it, as
above stated. The prisoner was committed for trial, but the bench intimated
their willingness to accept bail.
Folkestone Observer 6-4-1866
Quarter Sessions
Monday 2nd April:- Before A. Biron Esq, Deputy Recorder.
Extract from Mr. Biron`s preliminary address: Of the two prisoners for trial that day, the charge against Pledge exhibited some singular circumstances. He was charged on two indictments, one with having stolen a brooch, and the other with receiving it knowing it to have been stolen. It would be their duty to say whether the bill against him was true or not. It appeared that on Christmas Day last a brooch was missing from the house of the prosecutor, Mr. William Pilcher, of Folkestone, and the prisoner Pledge was known to have offered it for sale to a man for 2s 6d, but at the same time making use of most curious expressions, cautioning the man to whom he offered the brooch that it might be cried, and if it were he might give it up. The presumptive evidence was decidedly in Pledge`s favour. According to the evidence of another witness it appeared that the brooch was offered for sale at another place by Pledge, saying he had picked it up. It was for them to say how Pledge got the brooch into his possession. He thought under the circumstances it would be better for them not to return a true bill in Pledge`s case.
After some time the foreman of the grand jury returned into court, having found no true bill against George Pledge. Who was discharged from custody.
Note: George Hills had the Atlas Steam Brewery in Tontine Street. Mills was landlord of the London Stores.
Folkestone Observer 11-5-1866
Monday May 7th:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and J. Tolputt Esq.
Transfer Of License
Henry A. Herwigg applied for a temporary authority to sell excisable liquors at the London Stores, in Bayle Street, until the next licensing day. It was granted.
Note: This transfer takes place only shortly after Herwigg`s bankruptcy.
Folkestone Observer 25-5-1866
County Court
Monday May 21st:- Before C. Harwood Esq.
Interpleader Summons
Mr. George Hills claimed goods in the London Stores, Bayle Street, seized by Messrs. Leney and Evenden on judgement against Charles Mills.
Mr. Minter for claimant.
Mr. Fox for Leney and Evenden.
George Hills said he was a brewer in Folkestone. In September, 1863, purchased from Thomas Cobb the whole of the articles stated in the claim, together with other articles, situated in the London Stores, Bayle Street. Cobb was a former tenant and sold them to claimant on the 22nd September, 1863. Took possession of the premises at the time. Let the premises to Richard Oliver, with the furniture, as a weekly tenant. When Oliver left he let the same goods to Charles Walsh, on the same terms, as a weekly tenant. Next let them to Charles Frederick Mills, who is the defendant in the action. Let the furniture and premises to Mills at a weekly rent. He began in January 1866. Mills had paid eight or nine weeks` rent. Witness turned him out about a month ago. Gave him notice to leave. Mills was in possession when the levy was made. He left the goods in witness`s possession, and witness had since contracted to sell them.
By Mr. Fox: Was the actual owner of the things, but refused to supply Mills when the brewhouse stopped, which was in January. Could not say that he knew Mills was drawing other persons` beer in the house, because after he (witness) refused to supply, he did not trouble to know how Mills was doing. Did not know he was drawing Leney and Evenden`s beer on the 7th of January. Could produce the agreement as to the furniture, but it was not in court. Mr. Banks drew it up. Mills was to pay 16s a week. Had not sold the things. They were his things now. Had a partner. His name was Henry. Was no partner in this matter. The house was purchased by Mr. Henry in his own name. Do not produce the receipt from Mr. Cobb.
Mr. Fox said it seemed rather extraordinary that Mills should go in about the quarter, and should go to his client about the 6th of January.
Mr. Hills, to the judge: Mills has left Folkestone since the execution.
The High Bailiff said that when he levied, Mills was in possession, and he asserted that the property was his landlord`s.
His Honour: The property is the property of the claimant, certainly.
Note: No mention of Cobb in More Bastions. Walsh is listed as being Richard Walsh. Hills had been owner of the Atlas Steam Brewery, Tontine Street.
Folkestone Chronicle 26-5-1866
County Court
Monday May 21st:- Before C. Harwood Esq.
Interpleader Summons
Messrs. Leney and Evenden, plaintiffs, Charles Mills, defendant, Henry and George Hills, claimants. The ground of claim was that the goods which had been seized and sold by the plaintiffs in discharge of a debt for beer, had been purchased by the claimants.
Mr. Minter for the claimants.
George Hills said he was a brewer at Folkestone. In September, 1863, he purchased from Thomas Cobb the whole of the articles mentioned in the particulars of his claim. Cobb was formerly his tenant of the London Stores, in Bayle Street. Purchased the goods on September 20th, 1863, and took possession of them and of the premises. Afterwards let them to Richard Oliver as weekly tenant. After Oliver left he again let the house and goods to Charles Welch on the same terms, and after he left he again let the house and goods to Charles Mills, who is the defendant in this action. Mills took the house on the 1st January last. Turned him out of the house about a month since, when he left the goods in his (Mr. Hills`) possession.
Cross-examined by Mr. Fox, of Dover, who appeared for the plaintiffs: Witness was the actual owner of the goods at the present time. Mills`s tenancy commenced about the 6th of January, and not about the commencement of the quarter. Could not say he knew that Mills was drawing Leney and Evenden`s beer on January 17th. So long as he had beer to supply him with he did so. Had an agreement with Mills; J. Banks drew it up. Had not sold the goods to any person. Took a receipt from Cobb for the money paid for the things.
Mr. Fox said it was rather odd that defendant should leave Mr. Hills about the end of the quarter and come to his clients for beer on the 16th January.
Judgement for claimants.
Note: No mention of Cobb in More Bastions. Welch is listed as Richard Walsh. Hills had the Atlas Steam Brewery, Tontine Street.
Folkestone Observer 3-8-1866
Thursday August 2nd:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and James Tolputt Esq.
Assaulting A Publican
Richard Tyas was charged with assaulting John Floyd. Prisoner pleaded guilty. Prosecutor keeps the London Stores, Bayle Street. Tyas came in and wanted the landlord to play at cards, which the landlord refused to do. A dispute then arose respecting money said to be owing on both sides, and Tyas then knocked off Floyd`s hat. The bench imposed a fine of 1s, with 8s costs.
Note: Indicates that Henry Herwigg was only at the London Stores a VERY short time.
Kentish Gazette 7-8-1866
Borough Police Court: At this
Court on Thursday, before Capt. Kennicott and J. Tolputt Esq., a fly
driver
named Richard Tyas pleaded Guilty to assaulting the landlord of the London
Stores on
Wednesday night. It appeared that defendant and complainant were
together in a public house
when the latter reminded the former that he owed him
8d. Some words followed when, according
to complainant, defendant struck him.
The latter denied this and said he merely knocked off his hat
and did not
intend to injure him. The Magistrates ordered him to pay a fine of 1s., and
costs, 8s.;
in default seven days` imprisonment.
Folkestone Chronicle 27-10-1866
Wednesday October 24th: Before the Mayor, Captain Kennicott R.N., J. Tolputt and R. W. Boarer Esqs.
Temporary license was granted to Frederick Toghill for the London Stores
Folkestone Chronicle 2-3-1867
Saturday February 23rd: Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and J. Tolputt Esq.
Frederick Toghill, landlord of the London Stores, Bayle Street, was summoned for allowing fighting, drinking and disorderly conduct in his house on the night of the 15th instant.
P.C. Reynolds said that on going into the bar of the house at quarter to twelve o`clock he saw several drunken sailors who were talking very loudly. There were some prostitutes there, and in a back room were others, but all were behaving themselves orderly. About five minutes after, he heard a noise again, and on going there found the sailors fighting, and defendant putting them out of the house. He recommended defendant to clear the house, which he at once did.
Mr. Minter, who appeared for the defendant, admitted all that the constable had said, and claimed that no case had been made out, as according to the statement of the witness, defendant was turning the men out, therefore he was not allowing fighting; and the witness stated that the women were conducting themselves in a proper manner.
After a long consultation, the bench fined the defendant 5s. and costs.
Folkestone Observer 15-6-1867
Wednesday, June 12th: Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and James Tolputt Esqs.
Temporary authority was given to James Pollard to sell excisable liquors at the London Stores under the license granted to Frederick Toghill.
Folkestone Express 6-3-1869
Saturday, February 28th: Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and A.M. Leith Esq.
Rate Summonses
William Holland, of the London Stores, Bayle Street, was summoned for the non-payment of £1 0s. 6d. on account of the above house.
The defendant said he did not take possession of the house till the first week in November. The house was closed when he took it. He was willing to pay for the time he had been in the house.
The Bench said he was clearly entitled to have one month`s abatement. Order made for 15s. 4½d.
Southeastern Gazette 13-9-1869
Local News
On Wednesday last, the adjourned licensing meeting was
held at the Town Hall, before W. Bateman, Esq., Captain Kennicott, R.N., J. Tolputt,
Esq., and A.M. Leith, Esq.
Spirit licenses were granted in the cases of the
Wheatsheaf, Bridge Street; the Albion Hotel, London Stores, Tramway Tavern, the
Radnor, and the Mechanic’s Arms.
Folkestone Chronicle 23-3-1878
NOTICE
Builders desirous of tendering for RE-BUILDING a portion of the premises known as the London Stores, Bayle Street, Folkestone, for Arthur Langton Esq., can see the plans and specifications on application at the Imperial Brewery, Tontine Street, Folkestone, on, or after the 15th inst., and up to the 30th instant.
Tenders to be forwarded to me at my office on or before the 1st day of April next, not later than 12 o`clock.
The lowest or any tender not necessarily accepted.
GEORGE FRIEND,
Architect.
44, Earl Street, Maidstone.
Note: This makes duration of London Stores 9 years later than listed in More Tales From The Tap Room
Folkestone Chronicle 24-8-1878
Brewsters` Session
The Annual Brewsters` Session was held at the Town Hall on Wednesday last. The Magistrates on the Bench were, The Mayor (J. Fitness Esq.), Ald. T. Caister, Capt. Crowe, and J. Clark Esq. Considerable interest was evinced in the proceedings, as it was known that some of the applications for licenses would be opposed.
Bayle Street
Supt. Wilshere opposed the renewal of a license to a house in Bayle Street, belonging to Mr. Langton, brewer, and which has recently been pulled down, and rebuilt.
Mr. W. Wightwick, on behalf of Mr. Langton, appeared in support of the application.
Supt. Wilshere, having been sworn, said that the house last year was standing, but had been pulled down and rebuilt. The new building was very different from the old one.
Mr. Wightwick: Then you say it is quite a different construction?
Supt. Wilshere: Yes, quite a different kind of house.
Mr. Wightwick: Tell us what you mean by that.
Supt. Wilshere: An inferior kind of house.
In reply to further questions, the Superintendent said that there was a bedroom in the house, but could not say whether anyone slept there or not. He had laid no information against the King`s Arms Hotel, the Raglan, or the West Cliff Hotel although they had made alterations. He could not say that the house had been pulled down and rebuilt.
Mr. Wightwick saiod that this was a most cruel proceeding. There was not a single instance of an information having been laid agains the house, which had simply been pulled down and rebuilt. The house had been built on the old foundations; a man had always been stationed on the premises. Mr. Wightwick quoted from a decision given to prove that a house built on old foundations was not a new construction, and further put in as proof the advertisement for tenders, which was stated to be for rebuilding the premises.
Mr. Holdom, the builder, having proved that the house was rebuilt on the old foundations, The Mayor said the Bench had determined to renew the license.
No comments:
Post a Comment