Update

28th April, 2012: Folkestone Express Reports for 1882 Added. Links to these can be found to the right.

Photos of Guildhall, 1914, Nostalgia 50s Bar and Euphoria added by kind permission of Christine Warren

Nostalgia 50`s Bar, The Stade 2004 - c2006

Nostalgia 50s Bar, 2005. My thanks to Christine Warren for permission to use this photo.http://www.warrenpress.net/FolkestoneThenNow/FolkestoneThen_Now.html

 

 

 

Nostalgia 50s Bar. Image by G5pix

 

Licensees
Christopher Webb and Anthony Foord 2004 2004 + Renamed Euphoria

Euphoria, The Stade c2006 - c2008

Euphoria, c2006. My thanks to Christine Warren for permission to use this photo. http://www.warrenpress.net/FolkestoneThenNow/FolkestoneThen_Now.html

 

 

No details available

Clement Cowell, Steam Brewery, Cheriton Road

Folkestone Express 26-6-1880

Folkestone Chronicle 4-9-1880

Folkestone Chronicle 12-2-1881

Folkestone Express 2-7-1881

 

Folkestone Chronicle 19-3-1881

County Court

Clement Cowell v Samuel Baker: This was an action brought to recover 9s., the price of a firkin of ale supplied to the defendant by the plaintiff, who is a local brewer.

Defendant did not deny that he owed the money, but asserted that the plaintiff promised to outset the amount by purchasing bottles of him.

Plaintiff denied this, and His Honour gave a verdict against the defendant.

Folkestone Express 19-3-1881

County Court

Saturday, March 12^th: Before G. Russell Esq.

Clement J. Cowell v S. Baker: Plaintiff, a brewer, sued for the value of a firkin of ale, supplied in June, 1880. Defendant, a dealer, did not dispute having received the ale, but said it was an understanding that the amount was to be outset in bottles, plaintiff having told him he could take any quantity of “imperials”. He failed to satisfy His Honour on this point, and a verdict was given for the amount claimed.

Folkestone Chronicle 20-5-1882

County Court

Saturday, May 13^th: Before G. Russell Esq.

Cowell v Huntley: This was a claim for £2 13s. 6d. for beer account.

The dispute between the two parties was, as to the price the beer should be charged at, the plaintiff contending that the agreement was £1 7s. 6d. a barrel cash, and £1 10s. credit.

His Honour gave judgement for defendant, with costs.

Folkestone Express 20-5-1882

County Court

Saturday, May 13^th: Before G. Russell Esq.

Cowell v Huntley: Claim for 10s. 6d., balance of a beer account. The case came on at the last court, but was adjourned in order that the defendant might have an opportunity of going through the plaintiff`s books. This, however, had not been done, the plaintiff refusing to allow the defendant to do so.

His Honour ordered the plaintiff to let the defendant go through his books then, and after a lapse of some little time they returned into court.

Mr. Mowll, who appeared for the defendant, said that his client had been charged £1 10s. a barrel for beer and disputed the claim on the ground that, according to a verbal agreement, the charge was only to be £1 7s. 6d.

The plaintiff stated that he had supplied the defendant with beer amounting to over £100, and that they had a verbal agreement that the charge for the beer should be £1 7s. 6d. per barrel for cash, and £1 10s. for credit. The present claim was for credit.

The defendant disputed this and stated that it was an agreement only for £1 7s. 6d. a barrel to be charged, and that when the invoices were sent in he told plaintiff that he should not pay 30s. a barrel.

The plaintiff said that it was a rule of the trade to charge 30s. for credit and £1 7s. 6d. for cash. They could find several of the defendant`s receipts with the 2s. 6d. taken off.

The receipts were then referred to, and the plaintiff found to be correct.

His Honour gave judgement for the plaintiff, with costs.