Folkestone Express 1-3-1879
Advertisement
Sale Next Wednesday, Folkestone, Kent.
Auction Sale of a Copyhold Full Licensed Public House.
John Banks will sell by Auction at the King`s Arms Hotel, Folkestone, on Wednesday, March 5th, 1879, at three of the clock in the afternoon
Lot 1: All that substantially built Copyhold Full Licensed Public House
THE SKYLARK
Containing Beer Cellar, Bar, Four Bedrooms and Attic, Taproom with large boat builder`s workshop over, situate in Radnor Street and The Stade, in the occupation of William Spearpoint and Richard Saunders. The lease of the public house expires on the 6th of April next, the whole producing the annual rent of £39 per annum. The Copy Quit Rent payable to the Lord of the Manor is 4d. per annum.
Particulars and conditions of sale may be had at the office of the Auctioneer, Tontine Street, Folkestone, and of
Mr. W.G.S. Harrison,
Solicitor, Folkestone.
Folkestone Express 8-3-1879
Local News
On Wednesday Mr. John Banks sold by auction the Skylark, freehold fully licensed public house, Radnor Street. It was purchased for the sum of £605 by Messrs. Langton and Co.
Folkestone Express 26-4-1879
Monday, April 21st: Before J. Kelcey, J. Fitness and R.W. Boarer Esqs, and Ald. Hoad.
Bridget Clark, a wretched looking woman, was charged with stealing a black cloth jacket, value 14s. 6d., the property of Mr. Cephas Chasmar, draper, of High Street, on Saturday evening, the 19th inst.
Rosecutor said on Saturday evening, about eight o`clock, he missed the jacket, which had been hanging on a stud in the doorway of his shop, 68, High Street. He had seen it at six o`clock. The same evening, about half past nine, it was shown to him at the police station by P.C. Willis.
P.C. Willis said he went to the Skylark public house about a quarter to nine on Saturday evening. He found the prisoner in front of the bar, with the jacket lying in her lap. He asked if it belonged to her, and she said “Yes”. He asked where she got it, and she said she “begged it”. He took her to the police station on suspicion of stealing it. At the police station she said she had found it in the road.
Prisoner pleaded Guilty, and was sentenced to two months` hard labour.
Folkestone Chronicle 2-8-1879
Inquest
An inquest was held at the Town Hall on Thursday evening, before J. Minter Esq., Coroner, on the body of William Hall, Fish salesman. The Jury having been sworn, Mr. Farley was chosen foreman. Considerable interest was evinced by the public over the enquiry, and before the conclusion of the case the small hall, and the approaches to the Hall were crowded.
William Hall, having identified the body as that of his father, who lived in Stade Street, who was about fifty years of age, said that on Monday the 28th, between about half past twelve and a quarter to one, his father was standing on the kerb opposite Mrs. Spearpoint`s house talking to William Spearpoint, landlord of the Skylark. Thomas Anthony Hall was standing in the Market seven or eight yards from the deceased, and he shouted out “There`s two fine fish salesmen, been to college to get their learning”. Deceased said to Spearpoint “Hold on, we`ll make him spiteful”. Mr. Spearpoint replied “Hold on, Will, don`t say nothing”. Father said afterwards “Some people have children, and say they don`t belong to them”, a remark intended to apply to Hall, but he (witness) did not know whether Hall (who was not related to the deceased) heard what his father said as Hall stood in the Market considering. Hall then came across to where deceased was standing and said “What have you to say about the baby, Will?”. He up with his fist immediately and struck deceased on the left side of his face. The blow knocked his father down and he fell onto James Spearpoint`s lap, who was sitting on the doorstep, and then rolled into the gutter. Deceased lay there on his back for about a minute and a half, trying to get up by putting his hands behind him and trying to raise himself up. During the time he was trying to get up, Thomas A Hall ran towards him with the purpose of striking him with his fist. He (witness) was sitting about 3 yards from his father, and he then jumped up and ran towards his father. The statement he made to Ovenden was wrong, when he said Hall struck deceased when on the ground. He (witness) got between them, and Hall said “And you, too”. After his father got up he told him to go indoors. His father wanted to fight Hall for a sovereign. He then got hold of him, and with the help of the landlady of the North Foreland they faced him indoors to prevent him fighting. His father was not drunk, but he had had some liquor. He went home about half past eleven and found his father in bed moaning and groaning. His mother was attending him.
William Spearpoint, landlord of the Skylark, sworn, said he was present on the occasion referred to by the last witness, when deceased came and spoke to him. He heard Hall make some observation, which appeared to have some reference to them, but he could not say what it was. Deceased said to him “I`ll let him have it presently”. In a loud voice he said to Thomas Hall “Some people have children and don`t like to own them”. Hall came across to where deceased was standing and said “What do you know about the Bab?”, and then took hold of deceased by his guernsey and turned him round, and struck him in the face and the blow knocked him down. Deceased fell on his back, partly in the street and partly on the pavement. He laid there not more than half a minute, and then got up with the assistance of James Spearpoint. Deceased then ran at Hall and struck him, who was going to return the blow when the son got in between them and prevented them. Hall was drunk and could not walk straight. He afterwards said to Hall “You had no right to strike the old man”, when Hall replied “What do you know about it?”, to which he (witness) said “Nothing”, and he commenced jangling with me. While this was going on deceased came back again, and offered to fight Hall for a sovereign, who made no reply. Deceased then went away. Thomas A Hall was not sober. About five or ten minutes after he saw deceased go away, he (witness) was in the Royal George bar when deceased came in, and he heard them say to each other that they were very sorry for what had happened, and they should think no more of it.
James Spearpoint gave corroborative evidence, with the exception that prior to Hall addressing the remark “There`s two fish salesmen who`ve been to college to get their learning” to deceased and last witness, there had been a dispute between deceased and Hall regarding the mode of sale of fish.
Brett Mercer, a joiner, having given corroborative evidence, William Bateman, surgeon, sworn, said that he attended deceased and found him in bed in convulsions and insensible, in which state he continued with symptoms of pressure on the brain until he died on Thursday morning at six o`clock. He examined deceased`s head. Externally he found a large bruise on the left hip, likely to be produced by a fall. The upper lip was swollen and discoloured, as if from a blow, and cut on the inside. The left temple was discoloured about on a level with the other angle of the eye. There was a slight discolouration of the chest. He found a clot of blood at the base of the skull on the left side, opposite to the external bruise. There was a large effusion of blood, at least, I should think, altogether three ounces in the base of the brain. The brain was in a diseased state. Softening had commenced in the centre. The clot of blood which I had observed, and which corresponded to the external injury, came from a blood vessel. The cause of deceased`s death was effusion of blood upon the brain from a ruptured blood vessel. In his opinion that rupture was caused by such a blow or fall as he had heard described, but with such a diseased brain, excitement might have caused death. In his opinion the clot of blood which he found lying so close to the external mark on the left side of the temple showed that injury caused the rupture of the blood vessel.
Thomas Anthony Hall was called, but on being warned, declined to be sworn.
The Coroner, in summing up, said that if the blow was struck in a sudden heat of temper, caused by the action, and in consequence of the acts of the deceased himself (and it was quite clear from the evidence that deceased intended and succeeded in getting him into a passion) that would be manslaughter. In his opinion, after the evidence of Dr. Bateman, there could be but one result to their deliverations.
The Jury returned a verdict that the deceased man came by his death from the result of a blow struck by Thomas Anthony Hall, but that there was no intention on the part of Hall to do him serious bodily harm.
A warrant was immediately issued by the Coroner for the apprehension of Hall, who was taken in custody the same evening by Supt. Wilshere.
Yesterday the prisoner was brought before The Mayor, Gen. Cannon, J. Clark, T. Caister, J. Jeffreason and W. Carter Esqs., and after similar evidence to that given above had been taken, the prisoner was remanded until today (Saturday)
Folkestone Express 2-8-1879
Inquest
An inquest was held at the Town Hall on Thursday evening before J. Minter Esq., Borough Coroner, on the body of William Hall, a fish dealer, who died under the following circumstances:
William Hall deposed: I am a costermonger, living in Stade Street. I identify the body now viewed as that of my father, William Hall. He was a fish salesman, and lived in Stade Street. His age was about 50. On Monday, the 29th July, between half past 12 and a quarter to one, my father was standing on the kerb opposite Mrs. Spearpoint`s house, near the fishmarket. He was talking to William Spearpoint, landlord of the Skylark. Thomas Anthony Hall was in the market, seven or eight yards from the deceased. He sung out “There`s two fine fish salesmen been to college to get their learning”. I do not know who he meant. Father said to Spearpoint “Hold on, we`ll make him spiteful”. Spearpoint said “Hold on, Will, don`t say nothing”. Father then said “Some people have children and say they don`t belong to them”. I do not know whether Hall heard what he said, as he stood in the fishmarket two minutes considering. Hall then walked over in a passion across the street to where father was standing. I knew he was in a passion because he was very red in the face. He said “What have you got to say about the baby, Will?” Then he raised his fist and struck my father on the left side of the face. The blow knocked my father down. He fell into the lap of James Spearpoint, who was sitting on the doorstep of Miss Cook`s house, and then rolled on to the street. Father laid there about a minute and a half on his back. He recovered, and as he was about to try to get up Hall ran at him to strike him again. I was sitting on the steps when father was knocked down, and when Hall tried to strike him I jumped up to prevent him, and succeeded in doing so. (In giving a statement of the affair to Sergt. Ovenden, the witness said Hall struck the deceased as he was trying to get up.) When I got between them, Hall said “You too”. When my father got up he wanted to fight Hall. I told him to go indoors and lie down, and with the help of the landlady of the North Foreland I got him indoors to prevent him fighting. I did not see where Hall went to. I came outdoors again, and father came out just after and refused to go in. My father was not drunk, but had had some liquor. I went hom about half past eleven at night, and found my father in bed, moaning and groaning. My mother was with him, and she told me I had better go to bed, and I did so. When I got up in the morning, about half past six, I heard him still groaning. I was out with fish all the morning, and in the evening I went for Dr. Bateman.
William Spearpoint said: I am the landlord of the Skylark public house. I was sitting on the doorstep of Mrs. Spearpoint`s house, opposite the fishmarket, between twelve and one o`clock on Monday, the 28th inst. Deceased came across from the fishmarket and spoke to me. I heard Thomas Anthony Hall say something, which appeared to be addressed to us, but could not hear distinctly what it was he said. Deceased said to me “I`ll let him have it presently”. Then he said “Some people get children and don`t like to own them”, addressing himself to Thomas Anthony Hall, who came across from the market to where deceased was standing and said “What do you know about the bab?” He then took him by the Guernsey, and turning him round, struck him with his right hand in the mouth and the blow knocked him down. I only saw one blow, and if there had been another I must have seen it. Deceased fell backwards on to his back, and his head did not appear to strike the ground. Deceased did not lie there more than half a minute. While he was lying there Hall did not attempt to strike him. James Spearpoint helped him up. When he got up he ran at Thomas Anthony Hall and struck him. Hall was going to return the blow when deceased`s son got in between them and prevented it. The deceased walked away, but as he was drunk he could not walk straight. I said to Thomas Hall “You had no business to strike the old man”. He said to me “What do you know about it?”, and I replied “Nothing”. He then commenced “jangling” with me. While he was there, deceased came back and wanted to fight Thomas Hall for a sovereign, but Thomas Hall made no reply and deceased then went away. I think deceased was about 49 years of age. Thomas Anthony Hall was not sober. I then went to the Royal George, and about ten minutes after deceased and Thomas Hall met there. Both men said they were sorry, and that nothing more should be heard of it. I left them there together.
James Spearpoint, a fish hawker, living in Radnor Street, gave corroborative evidence. He added that there was a dispute between deceased and Thomas Anthony Hall as to the counting of some mackerel, and this led to the first remark. Deceased got up without any assistance from him. He was intoxicated and was lying on the ground about a minute trying to get up. When deceased got up, he struck Thomas Hall, who returned the blow by striking deceased in the mouth, when he fell back into witness`s arms. Deceased`s son then came and put him indoors. Thomas Anthony Hall was sober. Deceased was indoors about five minutes and again came out and said “I`ll fight Thomas Hall for a sovereign, and you (meaning witness) shall pick me up”. He pulled out some money from his pocket, but put it back, and witness then went away.
Brett Mercer, a joiner, of 19. St. John Street, who saw the occurrence, said he thought the deceased was struck by Thomas Hall near his ear. Deceased seemed to him to fall sideways, and laid on the ground about a minute, having evidently been drinking. When he got up he struck Thomas Anthony Hall in the face, and Hall struck deceased again on the right side of the mouth, and as he was falling the second time someone caught him. Deceased still wanted to fight.
Mr. William Bateman, surgeon, said: On Tuesday, the 24th inst., I was sent for to attend deceased, and went to his residence in Stade Street, about eleven o`clock in the forenoon. I found deceased in bed, in convulsions, and insensible. He continued insensible, with occasional convulsions, and symptoms of pressure on the brain, until he died this morning at six o`clock. I attended him up to the time of his death. I made a post mortem examination about five hours after deceased died. I opened deceased`s head. I found externally there was a large bruise on the left hip. It was such as would be produced, in my opinion from a fall. The upper lip was swollen and discoloured, as if from a blow, and it was cut on the inside. There was a discolouration upon the left temple, about on a level with the outer angle of the eye. There was a slight discolouration on the chest, below the left nipple, and the discolouration on the temple was such as would be produced either by a blow or a fall. I found a clot of blood at the base of the skull on the left side, opposite to the external bruise. There was a large effusion of blood, at least, I should think, altogether three ounces in the base of the brain. The brain itself was in a diseased state. Softening had commenced in the centre. The blood vessels of the brain were diseased and dilated, and in such a state as would be likely to be ruptured from a slight cause. The clot of blood which I observed and which corresponded to the external injury came from a blood vessel. I believe it was a small one, and it had bled slowly, and therefore the symptoms of compression did not show themselves for some time. The cause of deceased`s death was effusion of blood upon the brain from a ruptured blood vessel. In my opinion that rupture was caused by such a blow or fall as I have heard described. But with such a diseased brain excitement might have caused death. In my opinion the clot of blood which I found lying so close to the external mark on the left side of deceased`s temple shows that that injury caused the rupture of the blood vessel.
Thomas Anthony Hall was then called, and the Coroner pointed out to him that he could refuse to be sworn or give evidence, and informed him that there was a very serious charge hanging over him, and it would be for the jury to say upon the evidence before them whether he was Guilty or not of manslaughter or murder.
Hall replied that he was an ignorant man, and would prefer to consult someone who could advise him in the matter. He added that he was well known to be of a peaceable disposition, and a respectable man.
The coroner therefore thought it better that he should not be sworn.
He then summed up the evidence to the jury, commenting upon those portions which did not agree. He pointed out the law as regarded manslaughter and murder, and then said “If you are satisfied that this man`s death arose from a blow which he received from Thomas Anthony Hall, and if you are of opinion that he struck that blow with malice, intending really to do him serious and mortal injury and to kill him, then undoubtedly he would be guilty of murder. If on the other hand you are of opinion the blow was struck in sudden heat of temper, caused by the action and in consequence of the acts of the deceased himself (and it is quite clear from the evidence you have before you that deceased intended to get him into a passion, and he succeeded) that would be manslaughter. Therefore it seems clear that Hall would be guilty of the manslaughter of this man, because no person has a right to kill another, although he might have been put into a passion by some act that other has committed. It could not be tolerated that he would be entitled to strike deceased and kill him simply because he said something which put him in a passion. In my opinion, after the evidence of Dr. Bateman, there can be but one result of your deliberations”.
The jury retired for a short time, and then returned a verdict that the deceased man came by his death from the results of a blow struck by Anthony Thomas Hall, but that there was no intention on the part of Anthony Thomas Hall to do him serious boduly injury.
A warrant was immediately issued by the Coroner for the apprehension of Anthony Thomas Hall on the charge of manslaughter, and handed to the Superintendent of Police, together with a warrant to the Governor of St. Augustine`s gaol to detain him in custody.
The names of William Harrison Marsh, of the Raglan Inn, and Alfred Noel, fruiterer, South Street, were tendered as bail, but as the Superintendent said Hall was in custody on a police charge, the Coroner had no power to grant bail.
The prisoner will be brought before the Magistrates this (Friday) morning.
Southeastern Gazette 2-8-1879
Local News
An
inquest was held at the Town Hall on Thursday evening, lasting four hours,
respecting the death of William Hall, who died from injuries received from a
blow struck him by a man named Hall.
It
appeared from the evidence that the deceased gave Hall considerable provocation
and that Hall struck him in the heat of the moment. The deceased wanted to
fight him afterwards, but was prevented from doing so. Subsequently both men
went into a public-house near and expressed their regret at what had happened.
Eventually, however, deceased went home and was taken ill and died on Thursday
morning.
Dr.
Bateman said the cause of death was effusion of blood on the brain, caused, in
his opinion,-by the blow which he had received, stating at the same time that
the brain was in a very diseased state and liable to be ruptured from a very
slight cause.
The
jury returned a verdict of “Manslaughter,” and Hall was taken into custody.
Southeastern Gazette 4-8-1879
Local News
On
Friday morning Thomas Anthony Hall was charged with killing and slaying William
Hall. The evidence taken was the same as that adduced before the coroner on the
previous evening, the cross-examination being postponed until Saturday in
consequence of the unavoidable absence of the prisoner’s solicitor, Mr. Mowll.
On
Saturday the prisoner was again brought up and William Hall, son of the
deceased, said the quarrel took place between twelve and one o’clock in the
day. His father was out during the afternoon, and when he appeared at tea time
he seemed to have been drinking.
William
Spearpoint said when deceased and the prisoner made up their quarrel at the
Royal George they called for some more beer. Deceased was intoxicated at that
time.
Brett
Mercer said he did not think deceased’s head hit the pavement when he fell.
Dr.
Bateman said the fact that the man was drunk all day undoubtedly accelerated
his death. Death in his case might have been caused by excitement, but in his
opinion it was either the blow or the fall.
This
being all the evidence, Mr. Mowll, in a very forcible address, submitted that
there was no evidence to prove, first, that the deceased died from the effects
of the blow which the prisoner gave him, because it was stated that during the
afternoon deceased was out and had some drink, and might probably have fallen
down whilst in an intoxicated condition; secondly that the evidence showed that
deceased was struck in the mouth or thereabouts and not in the temple, and,
therefore, the bruise which was discovered there could not have been caused by
the prisoner; and thirdly, that the evidence distinctly stated that deceased’s
head did not strike the pavement. Mr. Mowll therefore asked the Bench to say
there was no prima facie case against the accused, and to decline to commit the
prisoner for trial.
The
Mayor said the Bench thought there was a prima facie case against the
prisoner, and therefore he would be committed for trial on the charge of
manslaughter. Bail for the prisoner’s appearance was put in and accepted, and
Hall left the court with his friends.
Folkestone Express 9-8-1879
On Friday Thomas Anthony Hall was charged before the borough Magistrates with causing the death of William Hall. The evidence taken was the same as that given at the Coroner`s enquiry and which we reported last week, and when the depositions had been completed, and application was made on behalf of Mr. Mowll for an adjournment until Saturday for the cross-examination of the witnesses.
On Saturday the prisoner was again brought up before the Mayor, Alderman Caister, General Cannon, J. Clark and W.J. Jeffreason Esqs.
William Hall, son of the deceased, in reply to Mr. Mowll, said he saw his father at tea time and told him he had no business to say what he had done. Deceased had been drinking all day, and was worse for drink at tea time than he was in the middle of the day.
William Spearpoint said when deceased and the prisoner made up their quarrel at the Royal George they called for some more beer. Deceased was intoxicated at that time. Witness saw him again that day, but not to speak to.
Brett Mercer said he did not think deceased`s head hit the pavement when he fell.
Dr. Bateman said the man being drunk all day undoubtedly accelerated his death. Death in his case might have been caused by excitement, but in his opinion it was either the blow or the fall.
Mr. Mowll then addressed the magistrates, urging that if they analysed the evidence carefully and looked at all the circumstances of the case, they would come to the conclusion that there really ought to have been no committal at all. No doubt the law was very jealous indeed with regard to human life, but if they looked at the evidence they would see that there was nothing to show that the blow which caused the death of the deceased was struck by the prisoner. There was no evidence that deceased was struck on the temple, and it was only an inference that when he was struck he fell, and in falling struck his head on the pavement. But the evidence did not justify even that inference. He contended that there was not a particle of evidence to justify a committal for manslaughter. Dr. Bateman spoke of several external bruises and marks on the body, but the inference was that the deceased, being in a state of drunkenness all day, had been falling about and hurt himself. He also deal with the case on the supposition that death had not occurred and that the prisoner had been summoned before the Bench for an assault. Would they, he asked, have convicted him, taking into the consideration the gross provocation he had received? The Bench might consider that as the prisoner was really committed for trial on the Coroner`s warrant, it would make no difference to him if he was also committed by the Bench, but if the Bench decided that there was not a clear case against the prisoner, and dismissed him, his acquittal at the assizes would follow as a matter of course.
The Magistrates, however, after a short consultation, considered there was a prima facie case against the prisoner, and decided to commit him.
Bail was accepted, prisoner in £50, and two sureties (Mr. W. Harrison Marsh and Mr. George Prebble) in £25 each.
No comments:
Post a Comment