Folkestone Daily News
28-11-1905
Local News
We regret to have to announce the death of Mr. Joseph
Whiting, of the Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street. He had long been suffering
from a malignant disease, and had been under treatment for it at the Victoria
Hospital. At one time it was hoped that he might be cured, but of late his case
seemed hopeless.
He was a thoroughly good-natured man, and his business brought
him into contact with the very poor, every one of whom had a good word for him.
He was one of those who did good by stealth, and many of his good actions were
naturally very little heard of. He leaves a wife and family to mourn his loss.
We, with all who knew him, beg to offer them our sincere
sympathy.
Folkestone Express
2-12-1905
Local News
We regret to state that Mr. Joseph Whiting, for many years
the proprietor of the Bricklayers Arms Inn, Fenchurch Street, died on Sunday after
a long illness, dropsy and heart disease being the causes of his death. He was
very highly respected among a large circle of acquaintances. The funeral took
place at the Cemetery on Thursday afternoon.
Folkestone
Daily News 24-1-1906
Wednesday, January 24th: Before The Mayor,
Messrs. E.T. Ward, R.J. Linton, T.J. Vaughan, W.C. Carpenter, W.G. Herbert,
Lieut. Col. R.J. Fynmore, and Major Leggett.
On the application of Mr. A. Atkinson, the transfer of
the licence of the Bricklayers Arms, held for 20 years by the late Mr. Joseph
Whiting, was granted to his widow.
Folkestone Chronicle
27-1-1906
Wednesday, January 24th: Before Mr. E.T. Ward,
Councillor Carpenter, Aldermen T.J. Vaughan and W.G. Herbert, Lieut. Col.
Fynmore, Major Leggatt and Mr. Linton.
The following licensed premises was transferred:- The
Bricklayers Arms to Mrs. Whiting, the widow of the late Mr. Joseph Whiting.
The Chief Constable said that Mr. Joseph Whiting had held
the licence for 20 years without a single complaint.
Folkestone Express
27-1-1906
Wednesday, January 24th: Before The Mayor,
Alderman Vaughan, Lieut. Col. Fynmore, Major Leggett, W.G. Herbert, W.C.
Carpenter, E.T. Ward, and R.J. Linton Esqs.
Mr. Atkinson appeared on behalf of Mrs. J. Whiting, and
applied for the transfer of the Bricklayers Arms, which licence was previously
held by her husband, the late Mr. J. Whiting. The Magistrates granted the
request.
Folkestone
Daily News 20-6-1906
Wednesday, June 20th: Before Messrs.
Herbert, Leggett, and Pursey.
John William Ayre was charged with assaulting a man
named Maxted, a journeyman butcher, in the employ of Durban Bros.
Complainant deposed that he saw the prisoner scuffling
with another man near the Bricklayers Arms. Suddenly he felt a sharp prick in
the left side of the chest. On opening his coat he discovered that he had been
stabbed. Without taking off his clothes he went to Dr. Linnington. He was
stabbed by prisoner. After the wound had been dressed he handed the clothes
(produced) to Inspector Burniston.
J.W. Whiting, of the Bricklayers Arms, deposed that he
knew the prisoner, and saw him at 11.15 on Tuesday night outside No. 13,
Fenchurch Street. He had a trowel in his hand, and was using obscene language.
The prisoner threatened to hit witness with the trowel. A man named Stokes, in
the employ of his mother, helped witness to turn him out of No. 13. Prisoner
was very abusive. Mr. Maxted came up and entered the house, and helped Stokes
to eject him. Witness saw prisoner move his arm, and heard Maxted shout out “I
am stabbed. I am going to the hospital”. Prisoner was given into custody.
Arthur Stokes, barman at the Bricklayers Arms, deposed
that he saw the prisoner on Tuesday night. The accused took a bedroom at No.
13, Fenchurch Street. About 11.15 he was standing outside using bad language,
and witness told him to clear off as he could not have his lodgings. Prisoner
remained on the curb, and then tried to go in No. 13. With the assistance of
Mr. Maxted and Mr. Whiting, witness got him out. Whilst on the doorstep,
witness heard Maxted shout out “I`m stabbed”.
P.C. Taylor deposed that he was called to the
Bricklayers Arms at 11.30 on Tuesday night. Prisoner was standing in the middle
of the street, and Mrs. Whiting, pointing to him, said he had stabbed a man
named Maxted, who had gone to the hospital. Witness took him into custody.
Prisoner said nothing. When in High Street witness saw the prisoner had his
right hand in his trousers pocket, and asked him what he had there. Prisoner
replied “A knife”. Witness took it from him. It was shut, but there was blood
on it. He told prisoner so, and he replied that he did not think so. Witness
charged him at the police station with unlawfully wounding Maxted by stabbing
him in the chest, and he replied “I shall say no more about it”.
Dr. Linnington deposed that the complainant Maxted come
to his house at 11.45 on Tuesday night. His clothes were saturated with blood,
and there were also cuts in the clothes. There was a small punctured wound in
front of the left shoulder, near the main artery, which was bleeding freely.
The wound was an oblong (sic) one, two inches deep, and one of the small veins
was divided. The blow had been a weak one, and the wound was not a dangerous one.
It could not have been caused by the trowel, but might have been caused by the
knife.
Prisoner said he was under the influence of drink and
had taken a bedroom at the Bricklayers Arms. Someone told him to clear out, and
he said “Give me my thing and I will”. He said he would give me a ---- good
hiding. Two or three made a rush for me and we had an up and downer in the
doorway. There were two or three on to me. I did not know what did happen, but
I never used any knife, although I had a knife in my pocket, which I gave to
the constable, who said it had blood on it. I replied that I did not think so.
He said something about stabbing, and I said I knew nothing about it.
Prisoner was committed for trial at the next Quarter
Sessions.
Folkestone Express
23-6-1906
Local News
At the Folkestone Police Court on Wednesday a serious charge
of maliciously wounding was dealt with by the Magistrates, John William Ayre
being arraigned for stabbing James William Maxted, a butcher.
James William Maxted, a journeyman butcher, residing at 13,
Abbot Road, said at quarter past eleven he was walking up Fenchurch Street when
he saw a scuffle with two men, so he ran to see what was the matter. The
prisoner was one of the men who were on the pavement opposite the Bricklayers
Arms. The men were rolling on the ground. As soon as he got there he felt a
sharp prick in the chest on the left side. He threw his coat open and
discovered he had been stabbed. He found the instrument had punctures his coat,
shirt and vest. He went straight away to Dr. Linnington, who dressed the wound.
The prisoner stabbed him. After the wound had been dressed he handed his
clothing (produced) to Det. Sergt. Burniston. The cuts in the coat, shirt and
vest would be directly over the hole.
Prisoner here stated he knew nothing about it.
Joseph William Whiting said he assisted his brother in
carrying on the business of the Bricklayers Arms. He knew the prisoner, who he
saw about a quarter past eleven the previous night opposite No. 13, Fenchurch
Street. He was using obscene language, so he told him to clear out of the
street. The prisoner had a trowel in his hand, and threatened to hit witness
over the head with it. Prisoner then sat down on the pavement. A man named
Stokes then came up, and he went to pull the prisoner out of No. 13, Fenchurch
Street, and witness went to his assistance. He offered assistance, and used
obscene language. Maxted came up while that was going on. He entered the house
to go to Stokes` assistance, and in the struggle he saw the prisoner move his
arm, and Maxted then shouted out “I am stabbed”. Witness did not see anything
in the prisoner`s hand. Maxted went away, and a police constable came and took
the prisoner with him.
Arthur Stokes, a barman in the employ of Mrs. Whiting, said
he knew the prisoner, who took a bedroom at No. 13, Fenchurch Street, which was
the property of Mrs. Whiting. At a quarter past eleven he saw the prisoner
outside the house. He was using bad language, and witness told him to clear
off. He remained on the kerb for a time, and then tried to get into the house.
However, witness would not let him in, and on account of the struggle Maxted
came to his assistance. Witness soon after heard Maxted call out “I`m stabbed”.
P.C. Taylor said about 11.30 the previous night he was
called to the Bricklayers Arms, where he saw Mrs. Whiting. She pointed to the
prisoner, who was standing in the street, and said “This man has stabbed a man
named James William Maxted, who has gone to the hospital”. Witness told him he
should take him to the police station. He took him into custody, and on the way
up High Street, witness noticed his right hand in his right hand coat pocket.
He asked him what he had got in his pocket, and he replied “A knife”. Witness
took the knife produced from his, which was shut. He examined it and on the
blade found some wet blood. Witness said to him “There is some wet blood on
this knife”, and prisoner replied “I don`t think so”. Later on he charged him
at the police station with unlawfully and maliciously wounding Maxted by
stabbing him in the breast with a knife. He replied “I shall say no more about
it”.
Dr. Linnington said Maxted came to his house at 11.45 the
previous night, and he saw his clothes on the left shoulder were saturated with
blood, while some blood was in his boots. On removing the coat, shirt, and vest,
he found a small punctured wound bleeding freely in front of the left shoulder
directly over the main artery. On examining the wound he found it went
obliquely downwards for two inches, and had divided one of the smaller veins,
just missing the large vessel. Maxted was very faint, so he gave him some
restoratives. If the wound had been a straight one it would have divided the
main artery, and that would have been a serious matter. The wound was not a
dangerous one, but was in a dangerous place. It might have been caused by the
knife produced. It could not have been caused by the trowel.
Prisoner said he was under the influence of drink the
previous night, and he could not distinctly remember what did occur. He went up
to the Bricklayers Arms and left his bag there. He had a drink or two and went
out. He returned at eleven o`clock and asked for a bed. The man said “I will go
and see the missus”. He came back and said “Clear out of it”, and he (the
prisoner) replied “All right, I will clear out if you give me my things”. There
was a crowd outside and someone said “Give him a ---- good hiding”. Two or
three of them made a rush for him. They had an up and down he supposed, and in
the doorway there were two or three on to him. They got messing about, and he did
not know what happened. He knew he used no knife. When he got up he heard
nothing about anyone being stabbed. The policeman came up, and he was taken to
the police station.
The prisoner was then committed to the Quarter Sessions,
bail being offered, himself in a surety of £20, and one surety of £20, or two
sureties of £10.
Folkestone Herald
23-6-1906
Wednesday, June 20th: Before Alderman W.G.
Herbert, Mr. G.W. Pursey, and Major Leggett.
John Wm. Ayres was charged with unlawfully and maliciously
stabbing John Wm. Maxted, a journeyman butcher.
Prosecutor, who appeared in Court with a bandaged arm,
stated that late the previous evening he was walking in Fenchurch Street, when
he saw a scuffle between two men, who were rolling on the ground together
opposite the Bricklayers Arms. Prisoner was one of them. He went to see what
was the matter, as he heard someone shout, and as soon as he got there he felt
a sharp prick on the left side of his chest. He threw his coat open, and
discovered that he had been stabbed. He went straight to Dr. Linnington, who
dressed the wound. The man who stabbed him was the prisoner. After the affair
he handed the bloodstained coat, shirt, and vest (produced) through which the
knife had pierced to S.S. Burniston.
Prisoner here interrupted, stating that he knew nothing
about it.
Joseph Wm. Whiting, who stated that he assisted his mother
at the Bricklayers Arms, deposed that he did not know where the prisoner was
lodging. He saw the accused at 11.15 the previous night outside No. 13, Fenchurch
Street, which belonged to his mother, and was opposite her house. Ayres was
using obscene language. He told him to clear out of the street, and prisoner
threatened him with a trowel he had in his hand.
Prisoner (interrupting): I did not.
Witness, continuing, said prisoner then sat down on the kerb
opposite No. 13. Arthur Stokes, who was in his mother`s employ, then came up
and tried to move prisoner, who was very abusive, from the door. Whilst this
was going on Maxted came along and tried to assist Stokes, who was scuffling
with the prisoner. Witness saw the accused move his arm forward, and Maxted
shouted out “I am stabbed, and I am going to the Hospital”. He did not see
anything in the prisoner`s hand. Maxted then went away, and the prisoner was
detained until the arrival of a constable, who took him in charge.
Arthur Stokes, a barman at the Bricklayers Arms, stated that
he knew the prisoner as having taken a bedroom the previous night at No. 13,
Fenchurch Street. He otherwise corroborated the evidence of the last witness.
P.C. Taylor deposed that when in Harbour Street the previous
night at 11.30, he was called to the Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street, where
he saw Mrs. Whiting, who pointed to the prisoner and said “This man has stabbed
a man named John William Maxted, who has gone to the Hospital”. He said to the
prisoner in Mrs. Whiting`s presence “I shall take you to the police station”,
and he thereupon took him into custody. On the way up the High Street to the
station he noticed that the prisoner had his right hand in the pocket of his
jacket. He asked him what he had got in his pocket. Accused replied “A knife”.
Witness then took the knife (produced) from him, examined it, and found wet
blood on it. He told the prisoner there were new blood stains on the knife, and
in reply Ayres said “I don`t think so”. Later, at the station, he charged
prisoner with wounding Maxted by stabbing him in the breast with a knife. He
replied “I shall say no more about it”. When first arrested he said “I`ll go
quietly to the station”.
Dr. W.W. Linnington deposed that at 11.45 the previous night
he was called up by Maxted, and saw him with his friend in the consulting room.
He saw that his clothes on the left shoulder were saturated with blood. Blood
was on his coat, under-vest, and boots. On removing the coat, shirt, and vest,
he found a small punctured wound on the left shoulder, directly over the main
artery. The wound was bleeding freely. On examining it he found that it ran
obliquely downwards for two inches, and had divided one of the smaller veins,
but missed the large vessel. Maxted was very faint, so he gave him a
restorative, and sent him home half an hour afterwards in a cab. The blow had
evidently been an oblique one. If it had been straight it would, probably, have
divided the main artery. It was not anything like a fatal wound, although in a
dangerous place. The wound might have been caused by the knife produced, but
certainly not with the trowel (also produced).
Prisoner made a statement to the effect that the previous
night he was under the influence of drink, and could not distinctly say what
did occur.He came in the previous day and took a bed at the Bricklayers Arms.
He had a drink or two, went out, and went back again just after eleven to go to
bed. The witness Whiting would not let him go in, and told him to clear out
somewhere. He replied that he would do so if they let him have his things.
Whiting said “Before he goes, give him a ---- good hiding”. He supposed he had
a scuffle in the doorway, with two or three on to him. They got “messing
about”, and he did not know what did happen, but he “knew he never used no
knife”. He did not know anything about anybody being stabbed. When he got up a
policeman came. When he got to the station he went to sleep. They charged him
with stabbing. He knew nothing about it.
Prisoner was committed to take his trial at the next Quarter
Sessions, being offered bail, himself in the sum of £20, and one surety of £20,
or two of £10 each.
Folkestone
Daily News 7-7-1906
Quarter Sessions
Saturday July 7th: J. Lewis Coward Esq.
John William Ayre was charged with wounding a man named
Maxted by stabbing him with a knife.
This case, according to our report of the proceeding
before the Magistrates, when the prisoner was committed for trial, disclosed
that the accused was a labouring mechanic travelling on the road in search of a
job. He came into the town and engaged a bed from Mrs. Whiting, landlady of the
Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street, who has cottages on the opposite side of
the road, which she lets out as common lodging houses. It appeared that he went
out, obtained some drink, and returned. Mrs. Whiting`s son and the caretaker
refused to let him go in, and a scuffle ensued, in the course of which Maxted,
a butcher`s manager, intervened and went to the assistance of Mr. Whiting. In
the melee Maxted felt what he described as a prick, and found, on unfastening
his coat, that he had been stabbed. He at once went to the Victoria Hospital
and had the wound dressed.
Prisoner pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. Weigall prosecuted
and, at the request of the Recorder, Mr. Dickens defended.
Mr. Weigall, in a brief opening statement, described
the circumstances leading up to the charge. He said that on the night of the 19th
of June accused, who, it appeared, was in his cups, was in Fenchurch Street beside
No. 13, opposite the Bricklayers Arms, a public house owned by Mrs. Whiting.
The man used obscene language. A man named Stokes asked him to go away. It
appeared accused refused, and there was a scuffle, in which Stokes and young
Whiting engaged with the prisoner. In the course of the struggle Maxted came up
and assisted Stokes. Almost immediately Maxted shouted out “I am stabbed; I am
off to the hospital”.
The first witness called was James William Maxted, who
repeated the evidence given by him at the police court, but deviated very
considerably from the evidence given by him before the Magistrates.
Joseph Whiting, a son of the landlady of the
Bricklayers Arms, gave his evidence in a most unsatisfactory manner. He
contradicted himself on so many occasions that Mr. Dickens, for the prisoner,
almost declined to cross-examine him. He first stated that he did not know who
No. 13, Fenchurch Street belonged to. Then he admitted that it was one of the
lodging houses carried on in connection with the Bricklayers Arms. Then he said
he took a trowel from the prisoner, but this he afterwards denied.
A man named Stokes, a barman at the Bricklayers Arms,
deposed that prisoner hired a bed at No. 13, for which he paid 6d. When the
prisoner returned at night, for some reason or other they refused to let him
have the bed, and gave him the 6d. back, which caused the squabble.
The evidence of P.C. Johnson and Dr. Linnington was the
same as given before the justices.
Mr. Dickens made a very able defence, and the Recorder
summed up.
The jury returned a verdict of Guilty, but recommended
the prisoner to mercy on account of the very great provocation he had received.
The Recorder, in an impressive address, bound the
prisoner over in his own recognisance in the sum of £20 to be of good behaviour
for the next six months.
This was received with great applause in Court, which
was immediately suppressed.
Folkestone Express
14-7-1906
Quarter Sessions
Saturday, July 7th: Before John Charles Lewis
Coward Esq.
A true bill was returned against John William Ayres, a
bricklayer, who was charged with unlawfully and maliciously wounding James William
Maxted on June 19th. Prisoner pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. Weigall
prosecuted, and Mr. Dicken defended.
In opening the case, Mr. Weigall said when the prisoner was
charged before the Magistrates he said he was under the influence of drink, and
because of that influence he got into that row. He denied using the knife. In
his (Mr. Weigall`s) there was no doubt that Ayres got quarrelsome in his cups.
John William Maxted, a butcher, residing at 13, Abbott Road,
described how on going home at eleven o`clock at night he saw the prisoner and
a man named Stokes scuffling on the pavement. He went to the latter`s
assistance and got between them, trying to separate them. As he went between
them he felt a sharp blow on the shoulder, and a hot rush of blood on the side.
He shouted “I`m stabbed”, and he went immediately to Dr. Linnington. The
prisoner stabbed him.
The Recorder: Show us how he struck you.
The witness: He made a straight drive at me. I do not think
he meant the blow for me.
Joseph William Whiting spoke to ordering the prisoner out of
Fenchurch Street because he used bad language. This witness, in the course of
his evidence, repeatedly contradicted himself.
A man named Stokes, in the employ of Mrs. Whiting, of
Bricklayers Arms, stated that the prisoner had taken a room at No. 13,
Fenchurch Street. They had a “jangle” with the prisoner, and they rolled into
the doorway of the house. Maxted came up and parted them, and witness heard him
immediately call out “I`m stabbed”. The reason Ayres was told to go was because
he used bad language.
The Recorder: I am afraid the morals of Fenchurch Street
would have been shocked had he slept there that night.
P.C. Taylor gave evidence of the arrest of the prisoner, in
whose pocket he said he found a knife on the blade of which there was some wet
blood.
Dr. Linnington described the wound received by Maxted as a
punctured wound. He further informed the Court that if the knife had gone
directly inwards it would have been fatal or nearly fatal. It might have been
caused by the knife produced, but not by the trowel.
Prisoner went into the witness box, and said he came to
Folkestone the same day. He paid 6d. for a bed at the house in Fenchurch
Street. He had never been in trouble before anywhere, and he had a clean sheet.
On June 19th he did have a drop too much. Two or three of them
started bullying him, so he said “Let me have my things, and I will go”.
Whiting came round and pushed him about, and when he was given his bundle
someone said “Give him a ---- good hiding”. He was knocked onto the doorway and
he had three or four on to him. He did not remember Maxted. He certainly did
not stab anyone with a knife. He usually picked his teeth with the knife.
Cross-examined, he said he did not see any wet blood on the
knife when the constable took it from him.
Mr. Dickens commented upon the contradictory evidence given
by some of the witnesses, and also upon the fact that Maxted, when before the
Magistrates, did not say who stabbed him.
P.C. Taylor was re-called, and said the man had been
drinking very heavily.
The jury, after deliberating for a short time, said they
found the prisoner Guilty under great provocation. They also recommended him
very strongly to mercy.
The Recorder said the jury had found the prisoner Guilty of
using the knife. It was a dirty, beastly, un-English thing. He had done such as
they did not approve of in that borough. They were very free at the Quarter
Sessions from people as cowardly as the prisoner appeared to have been,
although under great provocation. He had a horror of the knife. Round the south
coast they did not have knives drawn, whatever they did at Birmingham, from
whence the prisoner came. When they fought they did so with their fists. Had he
thought fit to have expressed his contrition for the crime and pleaded Guilty,
and thrown himself on the mercy of the Court, he would have received the most
merciful consideration a man could have received. Although he had thought fit
to deny the charge, and although he believed that the prisoner was fuddled and
fuzzled with drink, he was of opinion that he did not know what he was about.
He (the Recorder) intended to give him another chance. He hoped the course he
was going to adopt would be a lesson to him for the rest of his life. The
prisoner might think himself very lucky indeed that he was before a merciful
judge and jury. He was not going to make a felon of him. He was going to have
him bound over to be of good behaviour for six months, and he hoped it would be
a lesson to him to the end of his days.
Folkestone Herald
14-7-1906
Quarter Sessions
Saturday, July 7th: Before J.C. Lewis Coward Esq.
John William Ayres was indicted for unlawfully and
maliciously wounding James William Maxted on the 19th June. Prisoner
pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. L.A. Weigall prosecuted, and Mr. Dickens, at the
request of the Recorder, undertook the defence.
Mr. Weigall said that on the 19th June prisoner
was using obscene language at the top of Fenchurch Street. Several people
remonstrated with him, and in the end some, including Mr. Stokes, went to move
him away. Mr. Maxted was passing, and went to the assistance of Mr. Stokes,
after which he found himself stabbed. Before the Court prisoner denied using a
knife, but said that he was drawn into a quarrel, and was under the influence
of drink.
James Wm. Maxted, a butcher, of 13, Abbott Road, stated that
on the night of the 19th June he was walking up Fenchurch Street
when he saw a scuffle on the pavement between Mr. Stokes and the prisoner. It
was opposite the Bricklayers Arms. Knowing Stokes, he went between the two men,
and tried to separate them. As he did so he felt a blow on the shoulder, and
feeling a prick and rush of blood he went off to Dr. Linnington`s. A man named
Whiting was there, but was not fighting.
In reply to the Recorder, witness said that he did not see
how the prisoner stabbed him. He knew it was a deliberate blow, but he did not
think it was meant for him.
Joseph Wm. Whiting, an assistant at the Bricklayers Arms,
deposed that he heard the prisoner using obscene language outside No. 13,
Fenchurch Street. He went to him, and told him to clear out of the street.
Prisoner said “I won`t go for nobody”. Prisoner then added that he would hit
witness over the head with a trowel. Witness said nothing, and prisoner then
sat down on the pavement. After a while accused got up, and fell in the doorway
of No. 13. Stokes saw him and went to pull him out. There was a struggle.
Maxted went to the assistance of Stokes. Witness then saw the prisoner strike
out at Mr. Maxted, but witness saw nothing in his hand. The trowel had already
been taken from the prisoner into the Bricklayers Arms, but witness did not
know who took it away.
Cross-examined: No. 13 was his mother`s property, and was
let to a weekly tenant. It was a fact that the prisoner had engaged a bed in
one of the houses in that street for a week. Witness was 19 years of age. He
told prisoner to clear out of the street because he was using obscene language.
The prisoner had a right to be in a house in that street.
Arthur Stokes, a barman at the Bricklayers Arms, said that
the prisoner had taken a room at No. 13, Fenchurch Street. Accused was outside
there that night kicking up a row. Witness told him to clear off, and prisoner
said “Give me my bundle, and I will”. Witness went away, as prisoner kept on
using obscene language. After a while witness went back to the prisoner, and
there was a scuffle. During that time the witness Maxted came up and separated
them. Witness then heard Maxted say that he was stabbed and was going to the
hospital.
P.C. Taylor proved being called to the Bricklayers Arms by
Mrs. Whiting, who said that the prisoner had stabbed Maxted. Witness took him
into custody. On the way to the station, witness found that the prisoner had a
knife in his hand. At the station witness examined the knife, and saw that
there was some wet blood on it. Prisoner denied that he had stabbed Maxted.
Dr. Wm. Linnington described the wound to Maxted. It was a
punctured wound, and had it gone further in it would have been very serious, if
not fatal. As it was, it caused considerable loss of blood. The wound might
have been caused by the knife, but certainly not by the trowel.
Prisoner, on oath, said that on the day in question he
arrived at Folkestone, and went to Fenchurch Street, and asked for a bed. He
paid 6d. for it, and then went out. He was a bricklayer by trade, and had never
been in trouble of any sort before. He had had a little too much to drink that
night. When he went back that night he was bullied by some of the men. Whiting
told him to clear out, and he offered to go when he got the things. There was a
struggle, and several of them began to push him about. Eventually he was taken
to the police station. As to the blood on the knife, he could only suggest that
it had got on there through him picking his teeth.
Cross-examined: He believed that all the men were setting
upon him, and if he had struck them it would have been with his fist.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty, but recommended him to
mercy, believing that the act was committed under great provocation.
The Recorder: John William Ayres, the jury have found you
guilty of using the knife, and it is a dirty, beastly, un-English thing that
you have done. It is such a thing that we don`t do in this borough, or in any
other. In this borough we are very free, at our Quarter Sessions, from anybody
as cowardly as you seem to have been, although I agree there was provocation. I
have a horror of the knife, and so have we all here, and round the south coast
we don`t have knives drawn when we fight, no matter what they do at Birmingham,
or wherever you come from. If we fight we fight with our fists. I agree with
the jury, and had you thought fit to express your contrition for the crime, and
pleaded Guilty, and thrown yourself on the mercy of the Court, you would have
received the most merciful consideration any man could have received. Although
you have thought fit to deny this charge, and although I believe you did not
know what you were about, I intend to give consideration to the recommendation
of the jury, and I hope this will be a lesson to you for the rest of your life.
You may think yourself lucky that you are before a merciful judge and a
merciful jury. I have a strong dislike of making felons of men for a first
offence. I will have you bound over to be of good behaviour for six months, and
I hope it will be a lesson to you for the rest of your life. You stood in the
gravest peril in doing what you did, and I hope I am not doing wrong in taking
into consideration the recommendation of the jury, and the dictates of my
conscience, which is always towards dealing leniently.
Folkestone
Daily News 23-2-1907
Saturday, February 23rd: Before The Mayor,
Messrs. Ward, Fynmore, and Ames.
The licence of the Bricklayers Arms was transferred
from Mrs. Whiting to Joseph Wonald (sic).
Folkestone
Daily News 27-2-1907
Wednesday, February 27th: Before Messrs.
Herbert, Leggett, Boyd, and Linton.
The licence of the Bricklayers Arms was transferred
from Mrs. Whiting to Joseph Wornald.
Folkestone
Express 2-3-1907
Saturday, February 23rd: Before The Mayor,
Alderman Vaughan, Lieut. Colonel Fynmore, E.T. Ward and T. Ames Esqs.
The licence of the Bricklayers Arms was temporarily
transferred from Mrs. Whiting to Mr. Wormall.
Wednesday, February 27th: Before W.G.
Herbert Esq., Major Leggatt, R.J. Linton and G. Boyd Esqs.
The following licence was transferred: The Bricklayers
Arms, from Mrs. Whiting to Mr. J. Wormall.
Folkestone
Herald 2-3-1907
Wednesday, February 27th: Before Alderman
W.G. Herbert, Major Leggett, Councillor G. Boyd, and Mr. R.J. Linton.
The licence of the Bricklayers Arms was transferred from
Mrs. Whiting to Mr. Joseph Wormold.
Folkestone
Daily News 4-3-1907
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
Monday, March 4th: Before Messrs. Ward,
Fynmore, Linton, Boyd, Herbert, Pursey, Carpenter, Leggett, and Hamilton.
The transfers of the licences of the Bricklayers Arms
and The Raglan were confirmed.
Folkestone
Express 9-3-1907
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
The adjourned licensing sessions were held on Monday at
the Police Court, when the principal business to be considered was whether or
not the five licences should be referred to the East Kent Licensing Committee
for compensation. The Licensing Justices on the Bench were E.T. Ward Esq.,
Lieut. Col. Fynmore, Lieut. Col. Hamilton, W.G. Herbert, C.J. Pursey, R.J.
Linton and W.C. Carpenter Esqs., while other justices present were Major
Leggett, Mr. G. Boyd, and Mr. J. Stainer.
The licences of the Raglan and the Bricklayers Arms,
which had been temporarily transferred since the annual licensing meeting, were
confirmed by the Justices.
Folkestone
Herald 9-3-1907
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
Monday, March 4th: Before Mr. E.T. Ward,
Alderman W.G. Herbert, Lieut. Colonel Hamilton, Councillors W.C. Carpenter and
G. Boyd, and Messrs. R.J. Fynmore, C.J. Pursey, R.J. Linton, and J. Stainer.
An application was made by the licensee of the
Bricklayers Arms for the renewal of the licence, which was transferred since
the annual meeting, this being granted.
Folkestone
Herald 6-4-1907
Tuesday, April 2nd: Before The Mayor, Mr.
W.G. Herbert, Councillor Boyd, and Messrs. J. Stainer, G. Hawksley, and R.J.
Linton.
Henry Ratcliffe pleaded Guilty to being drunk and
disorderly in Fenchurch Street the previous evening.
P.C. H. Johnson deposed to seeing prisoner outside the
Bricklayers Arms about 9.40 the previous evening, drunk and disorderly.
Sergt. Osborne gave corroborative evidence as to
prisoner being drunk when brought to the station.
Prisoner said he had been down to Newchurch that day to
get some cresses to sell. He got back home about three o`clock, and fund his
children filthy and dirty, and no fire in the house. He asked where their
mother was, and was told she had gone out shortly after he had that morning. He
went into the Bricklayers Arms about five o`clock with some cresses, as a
blind, to see if she was there. He did not see her, but when he went in there
later, about eight o`clock, he saw her there drunk, with a baby in her arms,
and turned her out. He himself was no more drunk than a child just born. He
called it a rascally shame, he did.
The Chief Constable said prisoner had been brought up
six times, and convicted four times, being let off on the last two occasions.
If he complained of the conduct of his wife, there was no doubt he had brought
her to it.
Fourteen days` hard labour, without the option of a
fine.
Folkestone
Daily News 5-2-1908
Annual Licensing Sessions
The Annual Licensing Sessions were held on Wednesday.
The Magistrates present were Messrs. Ward, Herbert, Stainer, Linton, and
Leggett.
The Chief Constable read his annual report, which the
Chairman said was very gratifying and satisfactory.
The following licences were under consideration:
Railway Inn, Bricklayers Arms, Eagle Tavern, Railway Hotel, Coolinge Lane, and
Packet Boat.
The licences of the Bricklayers Arms, Eagle Tavern,
Packet Boat, and Railway Hotel, Coolinge Lane, were adjourned till March 2nd.
Folkestone
Express 8-2-1908
Annual Licensing Meeting
Wednesday, February 5th: Before E.T. Ward,
W.G. Herbert, W.C. Carpenter, and R.J. Linton Esqs., and Lieut. Col. Hamilton.
Superintendent`s Report
This report was read by Mr. Harry Reeve, as follows:
Gentlemen, I have the honour to report that there are at present within your jurisdiction
129 premises licensed for the sale by retail of intoxicating liquors, viz.;
Full licences, 78; beer “on”, 9; beer “off”, 6; beer and spirit dealers, 15;
grocers &c., 11; chemists, 7; confectioners, 3; total 129. This gives an
average, according to the census of 1901, of one licence to every 237 persons,
or one “on” licence to every 352 persons. At the last annual meeting, one “off”
licence for the sale of wines and spirits was not renewed as the business had
been discontinued by the licence holder. One new licence for the sale of cider
and sweets was granted, and three new licences for the sale of wines were
granted to chemists. At the adjourned annual licensing meeting, held in March,
five “on” licences (four full and one beer) were referred to the Compensation
Committee on the ground of redundancy. One full licence was renewed at the
preliminary meeting of the Committee, and at the principal meeting three of the
licences were refused and one renewed. The licences which were refused were the
Queen`s Head, Beach Street, Channel Inn, High Street, and the Perseverance
beerhouse, Dover Street. Compensation was paid in the cases of the Queen`s Head
and Channel Inn, and the premises were closed on the 28th of
December last. In the case of the Perseverance Inn, the amount of compensation
has not yet been settled; a provisional renewal of the licence will, therefore,
be required until the amount of compensation has been determined. There are two
houses licensed by the Inland Revenue authorities for the sale of beer in
quantities not less than 4½ gallons, also to sell wines and spirits in single
bottles. These licences can be granted by the Inland Revenue authorities
without a Magistrates` certificate, but only for premises used exclusively for
the sale of intoxicating liquors. Since the last annual licensing meeting 13 of
the licences have been transferred; one licence was transferred twice. Eleven
occasion licences were granted for the sale of intoxicating liquors on premises
not ordinarily licensed for such sale, and 31 extensions of the usual time of
closing have been granted to licence holders when balls, dinners, etc., were
being held on their premises. During the year ended 31st December
last, 125 persons (110 males and 15 females) were proceeded against for
drunkenness; 113 were convicted and 12 discharged. This is a decrease of six
persons proceeded against, as compared with 1906, and a decrease of 58 persons
when compared with 1905. Three licence holders have been proceeded against for
permitting drunkenness on their licensed premises; only one conviction was
recorded by the Magistrates, but this was afterwards quashed on appeal by the
Recorder at Quarter Sessions. One licence holder, who was convicted just
previous to the last annual licensing meeting for an offence under Section 16
of the Licensing Act, 1872, appealed to Quarter Sessions, but the conviction
was affirmed at the Borough Sessions held on the 5th April last. I
beg to suggest that the consideration of the renewal of this licence, the Railway
Hotel, Coolinge Lane, be deferred till the adjourned meeting. I have no
objection to offer to the renewal of any of the other licences on the ground of
misconduct, the houses generally being conducted in a satisfactory manner. The
order made by the Bench at the last annual licensing meeting, that all
automatic gaming machines were to be removed from licensed houses, was at once
complied with by the licensees. Eleven clubs, where intoxicating liquor is
sold, are registered in accordance with the Act of 1902. There are 16 places
licensed for music and dancing, and two for public billiard playing. I would
respectfully suggest that the Committee again refer the renewal of some of the
licences in the congested area to the Compensation Committee to be dealt with
under the provisions of the 1904 Act. I have received notices of four
applications to be made at these Sessions for new licences, viz.; one full
licence and three beer “off””.
The consideration of granting licences to the following
licensed houses was referred to the adjourned licensing sessions; Railway Inn,
Beach Street; Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street, and Eagle Tavern, High
Street, which are to be opposed. The licences of the Railway Hotel, Coolinge
Lane, and the Packet Boat, Radnor Street, were adjourned.
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
Folkestone
Herald 8-2-1908
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 5th: Before Mr. E.T.
Ward, Lieut. Col. Hamilton, Councillor G. Boyd, Councillor W.C. Carpenter,
Messrs. J. Stainer, W.G. Herbert, and R.J. Linton.
The Chief Constable (Mr. Harry Reeve) read his report.
(For which see Folkestone Express).
The Chairman said that it was a very satisfactory
report. The Bench were glad that there was a decrease in drunkenness in the
borough, and also that as a rule all the houses in the borough were well
conducted.
The various licensees then came forward for their
renewals.
The Magistrates formally gave notice that the granting
of the following licence would be deferred till the adjourned licensing
meeting, and that in the meantime notice of opposition would be served:-
The Bricklayers Arms Inn, Fenchurch Street, Folkestone;
lessee Mr. Joseph Wormald.
Folkestone
Daily News 2-3-1908
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
Monday, March 2nd: Before Messrs. Ward,
Carpenter, Herbert, Leggett, Fynmore, Linton, Boyd, and Stainer.
Bricklayers Arms
Mr. Mowll appeared on behalf of the owners and tenant
(Mr. Joseph Wormald).
The Chief Constable said the licence was opposed on the
grounds of redundancy. According to the area selected there were 915 houses,
with a population of 4,575. Within that area there were 34 on licensed houses,
29 being full licences, and 5 beer. Then there were 8 other licensed houses
where intoxicants were sold, bringing the total up to 42. That meant one
licence for every 21 houses, or one licence to every 108 persons. For the
borough at large there were 86 on licences, and 42 other licences – 128
altogether. Within the area in which the Bricklayers Arms is situated there
were also two registered clubs with 757 members. The present licensee obtained
the transfer in February, 1907, the rateable value of the house being £36, and
the owners Messrs. Beer and Co. There were three doors leading into the house
from Fenchurch Street, and there was a small yard at the rear leading into
Little Fenchurch Street, directly opposite the George III. Within a radius of
150 yards there are 13 other on licensed houses, while within a radius of 250
yards there were 26. There was practically no trade done at the Bricklayers
Arms, and in his opinion the licence was unnecessary.
Detective Burniston corroborated the statements of the
Chief Constable as to the trade of the house, and said it catered for a very
inferior class of customers. On one occasion the landlord had told him that he
hoped the house would be put back for compensation as he did not get a living.
The brewers paid the spirit licence, and if he held the licence till February
of this year he would be between £80 and £90 out of pocket.
Mr. Mowll said he knew great consideration was given by
the Bench as to the particular house to be put back. However, his clients would
not object, under the circumstances, to the licence being put back.
This course was adopted.
Folkestone
Express 7-3-1908
The adjourned Licensing Sessions for the Borough took place
on Monday, when the licensing Justices on the Bench were E.T. Ward Esq., Lieut.
Cols. Fynmore and Hamilton, and J. Stainer, W.G. Herbert, W.C. Carpenter, R.J.
Linton and G. Boyd. At the annual sessions the granting of five licences was
adjourned; The Railway Tavern, the Eagle Tavern and the Bricklayers Arms on the
ground of redundancy, the Railway Hotel, Coolinge, because a conviction had
been recorded against it, and the Packet Boat, so that plans for alterations
could be submitted to the Justices.
The Bricklayers Arms
Mr. Joseph Wormald applied for the licence of the
Bricklayers Arms to be granted to him. Mr. Martin Mowll appeared for the owners
and the tenants.
Chief Constable Reeve said the opposition to the house
was on the ground that it was not required. He produced a plan on which he had
marked out the congested area. Within that area there were 915 houses, with a
population approximately of 4,575, giving an average of five to a house. Within
that area there were thirty four licensed houses, twenty seven fully licensed
and five beer on. There were also eight other premises holding various licences
for sale by retail, making a total of 42 premises licensed within that area,
being a proportion of one licence to twenty one houses, and of one to every 108
persons. There was also one on licensed house to every 26 houses, and one for
every 134 persons. For the borough at large there were 86 on licences and 42
other licensed premises, making a total of 128 premises licensed for the sale
of drink by retail. That worked out at one licence to every 239 persons, or one
on licence to every 356 persons. There were also within the area two registered
clubs, with a total membership of 757. During the past year there were 125
cases of drunkenness dealt with by the borough Magistrates, and he found that
56 of them arose from the congested area. The Bricklayers Arms was situate in
Fenchurch Street, at the corner of Little Fenchurch Street. Mr. Wormald
obtained the licence on February 27th, 1907, and the registered
owners were Messrs. G. Beer & Co., Canterbury. The rateable value of the
house was £36. There were three doors to the house opening from Fenchurch
Street, one into a small bottle and jug department, and the other into a saloon
bar. Behind the saloon bar there was another room called the bar parlour, which
looked out of the back of the house. There was a small yard at the rear of the
house, with a door opening into Fenchurch Street, directly opposite the George
III, another fully licensed house. Within a radius of 150 yards there were
thirteen other on licensed houses, and within a radius of 200 yards there were twenty
six other on licensed houses. He knew the house very well and at the present
time there was practically no trade done there. In his opinion the licence was
unnecessary for the needs of the neighbourhood. The small trade done was with
an inferior class of custom than was done at the George III.
Det. Sergt. Burniston said he was familiar with the
public houses in Folkestone and frequently visited them in the course of his
duties. He had visited the Bricklayers Arms almost every day since the present
tenant had had the licence. With regard to the amount of trade that was done,
it was very small indeed. On January 29th he visited the house, and
he then saw the tenant and had a conversation with him. He (the landlord) said
“I hope the house will be put back for compensation. I do not get a living; the
brewers pay the spirit licence. By February 23rd, a year since I
held it, I shall be between £80 and £90 out of pocket”. He (witness) considered
the house was not necessary for the requirements of the neighbourhood.
Mr. Mowll said he had not cross-examined the witnesses
because he knew that considerable thought was exercised in considering which
houses should be opposed. His clients were sorry that particular house should
be selected. A substantial trade was done there, and one which they should be
very sorry to lose. Having regard to the attention that was given to the
licences, and the fact that there was no doubt in that area some houses must be
done away with, his clients would submit to the notice and they did not propose
to contest the question. The fact that the present tenant appeared to have a
rather poor view of the situation might, as they knew, depend principally upon
himself. One fact which spoke volumes was that from 1884 until the present
tenant went into occupation the licence was held by Mrs. Whiting and her late
husband without change of tenancy. During that time the house was well
conducted, and they made a very satisfactory livelihood from it.
The Chairman announced that the Magistrates had decided
to refer the licence to Canterbury.
Folkestone
Herald 7-3-1908
Adjourned Licensing Sessions
Monday, March 2nd: Before Mr. E.T. Ward,
Councillor W.C. Carpenter, Councillor G. Boyd, Col. Fynmore, Col. Hamilton,
Messrs, W.G. Herbert, and J. Stainer.
The adjourned Licensing Sessions for the Borough of
Folkestone were held at the Town Hall on Monday morning, when the licences of
three houses, the Railway Inn, Beach Street (Beer and Co.), the Eagle, High
Street (Style and Winch), and the Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street (Ash and
Co.), were referred to the Compensation Authority for East Kent.
The Bricklayers Arms
The case of the Bricklayers Arms was the first house to
be taken, the notice of opposition having been served on the ground of
redundancy. Mr. Martin Mowll appeared for the owners.
The Chief Constable submitted a plan showing what he
termed the congested area, and also the whole of the licensed houses in the
borough. Within that congested area there were 915 houses, with a population,
approximate, of 4,575, giving an average of five to a house. Within that area
there were 34 licensed houses, 29 being full licensed houses and 5 beer “on”.
There were also 8 other premises holding various licences for the sale by
retail, making a total of 42 premises licensed within the area, and a
proportion of one licence to every 21 houses, or 108 persons, and one on
licence to every 26 houses, or every 134 persons. For the borough at large
there were 86 on licences and 42 other licences, giving a total of 128 premises
licensed for the sale of drink by retail. That did not include the
Perseverance, which would be closed shortly. The borough statistics, according
to the census of 1901, showed a proportion of one licence to every 239 persons,
or one on licence to every 356 persons. There were also within that congested
area 2 registered clubs, with a total membership of 757. During the past year
there were 125 cases of drunkenness dealt with by the Borough Justices, and 56
arose from the small congested area. The house in question was situate in
Fenchurch Street, at the corner of Little Fenchurch Street, and the present
licensee was Mr. Joseph Wormald, who obtained the transfer of the house on 27th
February, 1907. The registered owners were Messrs. G. Beer and Co., of
Canterbury, and the rateable value was £36. There were three doors to the house
opening from Fenchurch Street, one into the public bar, one into a small bottle
and jug department, and the other into a saloon bar. Behind the saloon bar was
another room, called the bar parlour, and that looked into the back garden.
There was a small yard at the rear of the house, with a door leading into
Little Fenchurch Street, directly opposite the fully licensed house called
George the Third. Within a radius of 150 yards there were 13 other on licensed
houses, and within a radius of 200 yards there were 26 others. He knew the
house very well, and at the present time there was practically no trade
whatever done there. In his opinion the licence was quite unnecessary for the
needs of that neighbourhood. The small trade that was done was with a much
inferior class of customer to that using the George the Third.
Detective Sergeant Burnistion said that in the course
of his duties he frequently visited the public houses of Folkestone. He had
often visited the house, and during the last twelve months he had been there
almost every day. With regard to the amount of trade done it was very small
indeed. On the 29th January he visited the house, and he saw the
tenant. In the course of conversation the landlord said “I hope the house will
e put back for compensation. I do not get a living. The brewers pay the spirit
licence. By February 23rd, when I shall have held the licence twelve
months, I shall be between £80 and £90 out of pocket”. Witness did not think
the house necessary for the requirements of the neighbourhood.
Mr. Mowll said he had not thought it necessary or
advisable to cross-examine, as very considerable thought and attention were
given as to which cases should be put back. His clients were sorry that the
case should be put back, as a fairly substantial trade was done, but they would
not contest the case. From 1884 until the present tenant went into the house
the licence was held by Mr. and Mrs. Whiting without a change. That spoke
volumes, and it was a fact that they made a very satisfactory living.
The Bench referred the licence.
Folkestone
Express 11-7-1908
East Kent Licensing
At the Licensing Committee`s sitting at Canterbury on
Thursday, the three licences referred by the local justices, namely the Eagle
Tavern, High Street, the Railway Tavern, Beach Street, and the Bricklayers
Arms, Fenchurch Street, were considered, and the Court decided not to renew any
of them. They will be dealt with by the Compensation Committee.
Folkestone
Herald 11-7-1908
Local News
The principal meeting of the East Kent Licensing
Committee was held at Canterbury on Thursday, when Lord Harris presided.
The following Folkestone houses came up for decision: The
Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street, Folkestone, an alehouse, belonging to
Messrs. G. Beer and Co. Mr. Joseph Wormold tenant; the Railway Inn, Beach
Street, Folkestone, alehouse, belonging to Messrs. Ash and Co. Mr. William
Hopkins tenant; The Eagle, High Street, Folkestone, a beerhouse (ante 1869),
belonging to Messrs. Style and Winch. Mr. William Henry White tenant.
Of these the following were allowed to go to
compensation without opposition: The Bricklayers Arms and the Eagle.
Folkestone
Herald 17-10-1908
Monday, October 12th: Before Alderman J.
Banks, Messrs. R.J. Linton, J. Stainer, and W.G. Herbert.
George Watson pleaded Guilty to stealing two pairs of
boots.
Detective Sergt. Burniston deposed that at 9.20 p.m. on
Saturday last he called at Mr. Bainbridge`s shop in Tontine Street, and in
consequence of what he was told he made inquiries. About ten minutes later he
saw the prisoner at the door of the Bricklayers Arms in Fenchurch Street.
Accused had under his arm a parcel tied with string. Witness asked what the
parcel contained, and the prisoner replied “Find out”. He took the parcel and
found it contained a pair of boots. Witness told the prisoner that he would
charge him with stealing the boots, and took him into custody. Having handed
the accused over to P.C. Adams, witness went to Mr. Bainbridge, who identified
the boots, and afterwards he went to the police station and charged the
prisoner, who made no reply. He then noticed that the prisoner was wearing a
new pair of hobnail boots. On being asked where he got them, he replied “Bought
them; find out”. Witness took them off and conveyed them to the West End Boot
Company`s shop, where Mr. Osborne, the manager, identified them. Witness went
to the police station and charged the prisoner, who made no reply.
Thomas Bainbridge said that he was a bootmaker, of 39
Tontine Street. He hung several pairs of boots out on a ledgeway just outside
the shop on the previous Saturday morning. Later in the day he found one pair
missing. They were afterwards brought to him by Sergt. Burniston. He valued
them at 4s. 11d.
George Osborne observed that on Saturday morning he
hung several pairs of boots on an iron rail outside his shop in Tontine Street.
At about 5.30 he missed a pair of hobnailed boots (produced). They were brought
to him later by Sergt. Burniston. He valued them at 5s. 4d.
Prisoner said that he had been drinking very
considerably lately. His home was at Hastings. He was, however, doing a little
wandering about the country. He was by trade a painter.
He was sentenced to 21 days` hard labour.
Folkestone
Express 24-10-1908
East Kent Licensing
At a meeting of the East Kent Licensing Committee on
Monday, many cases were dealt with.
In the case of the Bricklayers Arms, Fenchurch Street,
Folkestone, of which Mr. J. Wormald is the tenant, and Messrs. Beer and Co., of
Canterbury, the registered owners, Mr. A.K. Mowll, who appeared for both
parties, stated that it had been agreed to accept £1,200, of which £1,125 would
go to the brewers, and £75 to clear a discharge to the tenant.
Folkestone
Herald 24-10-1908
East Kent Licensing
A supplementary meeting of the East Kent Licensing
Committee was held at the Sessions House, at Canterbury, on Monday, when Lord
Harris presided. The following Folkestone houses were considered for
compensation:-
Bricklayers Arms
An alehouse in Fenchurch Street; Mr. Joseph Wormald,
tenant; Messrs. G. Beer and Co., owners.
Mr. A.K. Mowll appeared for the landlords & tenant,
and said both parties agreed to the compensation being fixed at £1,200,
including fixtures, the owners to receive £1,125, and the tenant £75, and a
clear discharge.
Folkestone
Express 17-1-1931
Obituary
The funeral took place in the Cheriton Road Cemetery
yesterday (Thursday) afternoon of Mrs. Frances Jane Whiting, widow of Mr.
Joseph Allen Whiting, who for many years was the licensee of the old
Bricklayer`s Arms, Fenchurch Street.
The deceased lady, who was 65 years of age, had been in
indifferent health for some time, and passed away early in Monday afternoon.
She was well known and greatly respected, and the news of her death will be
received with feelings of profound regret, particularly by the older
inhabitants of the town. Mrs. Whiting was of a very kindly disposition, and she
will be much missed by those whom she helped in times of need during the 45
years she resided at the old Bricklayer`s Arms. Mrs. Whiting`s husband died 26
years ago, and Mrs. Whiting has remained in residence at the old Bricklayer`s
Arms ever since. This old building has been occupied by the family for over 63
years.
Folkestone
Herald 17-1-1931
Obituary
We regret to record the death on Tuesday of Mrs. F.J.
Whiting, wife of the late Mr. Joseph Alan Whiting, former licensee of the old
Bricklayers Arms in Great Fenchurch Street, at her house at 12, Great Fenchurch
Street, at the age of 65.
Mr. and Mrs. Whiting were widely known and respected
during the time when the old hostel was in existence. Mrs Whiting will be
remembered for her great kindness of heart to those in need during the 43 years
in which she held the establishment.
The funeral took place at the Folkestone Cemetery on
Thursday.
Folkestone Express
21-8-1937
Obituary
It is with deep regret that we record the death on
Thursday in last week of Mr. Joseph William Whiting, at his residence, 2,
Spring Terrace, Folkestone, at the age of 50 years.
He was the eldest son of the late Mr. and Mrs.
Joseph Whiting, of the Bricklayers Arms, in Fenchurch Street. In 1907 he
joined the Royal Horse Artillery and saw active service in India, Gallipoli and
France. During his period in France he received several wounds of a serious
nature and in 1919 he was discharged. He obtained the post of usher at the
Grand Hotel and continued there for sixteen years, until failing health forced
him to retire and since then his health declined.
The funeral took place on Monday at the Folkestone
Cemetery at Hawkinge.
Folkestone Herald
21-8-1937
Obituary
The death occurred on Thursday of last week, after,
a long illness, of Mr. Joseph William Whiting, 50, of 2, Spring Terrace,
Folkestone.
Mr. Whiting served for a long time in the Army. At
the outbreak of the War he was in India, whence he went to the Dardanelles.
From there he was sent to France where he was severely wounded and invalided
home. Since the War he had been an usher at the Grand Hotel until his illness
three years ago.
The funeral took place on Monday at Hawkinge
Cemetery.
No comments:
Post a Comment