Folkestone Chronicle 1-12-1900
Saturday, November 24th: Before Messrs.
Wightwick, Banks, Pledge, Salter, and Swoffer, and Lieut. Col. Hamilton.
Mary Pearson, of the True Briton, was summoned for selling
beer contrary to the Act – to wit, more than half a pint in an unstamped
measure. Mr. Kidson, the Town Clerk, appeared to prosecute, and the defendant
was represented by Mr. G. Haines, who informed the Bench that his client was
not present, as she was suffering from an attack of blood poisoning.
Mr. Kidson, in opening, said the summons was issued under a
recent Act of Parliament, which provided that every person supplying a larger
quantity that half a pint of beer should supply the same in a marked measure
according to imperial standard. On the 15th of November Mr. Gosling
visited the True Briton. A man came in and asked for a pint of ale. Mr. Gosling
saw the ale drawn and handed to the customer in the glass produced.
W. Gosling said he saw the barmaid fill the glass from the
beer engine. The beer was delivered to the customer, who tendered a silver coin
and received change. The glass had no stamp upon it whatever. He tested the
contents of the glass with a half pint and a gill measure which he had in his
pocket; it did not quite fill these. The half pint and gill measure would be
three quarters of a pint. He then saw Mrs. Pearson, and called her attention to
the warning he had already given her about serving more than half a pint in
unstamped glasses.
By Mr. Haines: I report these cases; the local authorities
take action. The stamped glass produced did not come from Mrs. Pearson`s; it
came from the Prince Albert.
John Delo, plasterer, Saffrons Place, said he remembered on
the night of the 15th of November being in the True Briton. He asked
and paid for a pint of ale.
Mr. Kidson: Are you satisfied with the glass (produced) for
a pint?
Witness: Yes, it`s the rule of the room.
By Mr. Haines: I expected the glass that was served to me.
It is a regular smoking room party which frequents this room. I was not disappointed
in the measure.
Mr. Haines said he would only address a few observations to
the Bench on behalf of the defendant – as he was afraid that under the Act they
must convict – in mitigation of the penalty. Miss Pearson had acted in
ignorance. A certain number of regular customers used the smoking room of the
house, and they agreed, for this privilege, and to keep the party select, to
pay threepence for the quantity of beer in the measure produced. Legally the
defendant was wrong, but she thought that she was entitled to use such a
measure as the customers agreed upon.
The Bench considered the case proved, and fined the
defendant 10s. and 16s. costs, the Chairman remarking to Mr. Haines that he
hoped it would be a warning in future to his client.
Folkestone Express
1-12-1900
Saturday, November 24th: Before Aldermen J.
Banks, W. Salter, and J. Pledge, Lieut. Col. Hamilton, and G.I. Swoffer Esq.
Mary Pearson, the proprietress of the True Briton, was
summoned for using a measure not stamped. The Town Clerk prosectuted, and the
defendant was represented by Mr. G.W. Haines.
The Town Clerk said before he made his observations he
wished to amend the information. He understood that the defendant served the
liquor herself, but had since ascertained it was served by an assistant.
Mr. Haines said at first a fresh summons ought to be issued,
but on the Bench deciding to proceed with the case he made no objection.
Mr. W.T. Gosling, Inspector of Weights and Measures, said on
Thursday, the 15th November, he visited the True Briton public house
in Harbour Street, about 9.30 o`clock in the evening. He was standing in the
bar when a customer went in and called for a pint of ale. The barmaid took a
glass unstamped, and filling it, took it into a smoking room, where the
customer was sitting. He tendered hr a silver coin, and she returned the
change. He did not see what it was. As witness had a half pint measure and a
gill measure in his pocket, he poured the contents into a standard measure, and
it did not fill the two measured, which denoted the amount of liquor which was
asked for. There was not three parts of a pint. Witness saw Miss Pearson and
told her he had cautioned her before when he was instructed to visit every
public house in the town as to deficient measure.
Questioned by Mr. Haines, he said the ale was ordered in the
passage, and the customer was the only man sitting in the parlour.
John Delo, a plasterer, residing in Saffrons Place, said he
was the customer referred to, and he ordered a pint of ale, for which he paid
the usual price, 3d. It was served in a glass similar to that produced, which
was not stamped. He saw the Inspector measure the contents, and take possession
of the glass.
In reply to Mr. Haines, he said he had been a customer for
some years, and he did not expect to have the full measure.
Mr. Haines, on behalf of the defendant, said there was no
doubt it was a technical offence, which had been committed inadvertently in the
absence of the defendant, who was ill, from the bar. She would take care in
future that the Act was complied with.
The Bench fined her 10s. and 16s. costs.
Folkestone Herald
1-12-1900
Saturday, November 24th: Before Mr. Wightwick,
Alderman Pledge, Lieut. Col. Hamilton, and Messrs. Swoffer and Salter.
Mary Pearson, landlady of the True Briton Inn, Harbour
Street, was charged with having sold beer in an unstamped measure. Mr. A.F.
Kidson (the Town Clerk) prosecuted, and Mr. Haines defended.
Mr. Kidson asked the Bench to allow the information to be
amended. He understood that the information was laid that the defendant herself
served the beer, but that was wrong, as an assistant served it. The Act of
Parliament provided that every person selling intoxicating liquor by retail
should not sell more than half a pint in a measure which was not marked
according to the Imperial Stamp, and the maximum penalty was £10. The facts
were that on a certain date, the 15th November, Mr. Gosling was in
the True Briton Inn, when a man came in and asked for a pint of ale. Gosling saw
the ale served in the glass produced, and handed to the customer. He would
prove that the glass only held something like three parts of a pint. The man
who purchased the ale paid the usual price for a pint. There was no mark
whatever on the glass.
W. Gosling, Inspector of Weights and Measures, said that at
5.30 in the evening of the 15th November he visited the True Briton
Hotel. He was standing in the bar when a customer entered and asked for a pint
of ale. He saw the barmaid fill the glass produced from the beer engine. She
took it into the room and stood it on the table, and the man tendered a silver
coin in payment. The glass had no stamp nor denominator. He followed the
barmaid into the room, and tested the contents of the glass with a half pint and
a gill measure, which he had in his pockets. Afterwards he put the glass in his
pocket, telling her that he had spoken to her some time previously about
selling more than half a pint in an unstamped measure.
By Mr. Haines: The man drunk the beer out of the two
measures he had poured it into. There were several stamped measures.
John Delo, plasterer, of Saffron`s Place, said that on the
night in question he went into the True Briton and asked for a pint of ale. He
paid 3d. for it. He saw the last witness measure the contents, and then take
the glass away.
Mr. Haines said there was noting for the Magistrates to do
but convict. Where the beer was served was a bar parlour, and if they had
charged the same prices as in the ordinary bar, they would have everybody in
there. It was arranged between a number of the customers and Miss Pearson that
instead of being charged at a higher price they should have a smaller glass.
She acted in ignorance.
The Chairman said that that being the first offence it would
be a warning to Miss Pearson and others that they must not sell beer in
unstamped measures. A fine of 10s. and 16s. costs would be imposed.
Folkestone Chronicle
26-1-1901
Saturday, January 19th: Before Messrs. Fitness,
Wightwick, and Herbert, and Lieut. Col. Hamilton.
Mary Pearson, landlady of the True Briton, was summoned for
selling beer to an intoxicated person on her premises on the 12th
January.
The intoxicated gentleman was “Seaweed”, the individual with
the East end record for the most accommodating swallowing capacity.
Mr. Haines, who appeared for the defendant, pleaded Not
Guilty. He mentioned that he had a doctor`s certificate giving the cause of
defendant`s non-appearance that morning, she being under the doctor`s treatment
at Tunbridge Wells.
P.C. Johnstone said at 7.30 p.m. on Saturday, the 12th,
in company with P.C. Watson, he entered the bar of defendant`s house, and saw
William Spearpoint, of 20, Fenchurch Street, very drunk, with a pint glass of
beer three parts full beside him. He drank the beer whilst witness was in the
bar. Mrs. E.J. Pearson was behind the bar, and witness said to her “Did you
serve this man?” She replied “Yes”. He said “Do you see the drunken condition
he is in?” She replied that she did not notice him when he came in, or she
would not have served him, adding “They are such funny people. You can`t say
when they are drunk”. She then said to Spearpoint “You had better go outside”.
Spearpoint refused, and witness ejected him. When outside he became very
disorderly. Afterwards witness went back to the house, and, seeing Mrs. E.J.
Pearson, told he he should report the landlady. She replied “Well, I do not
really understand much about the business. The landlady is away”. Witness added
that earlier in the evening he saw Spearpoint ejected from the Queen`s Head and
later from the Princess Royal. He was very drunk.
P.C. Watson corroborated the last witness, and Sergt.
Osborne, who entered the charge against Spearpoint, upheld the opinion as to
his condition.
George Betts said that Spearpoint lodged at his house. Three
times on Saturday, the 12th, he was drunk, and at 7 o`clock witness
turned him out. The man was a fair nuisance.
The Chief Constable: So he has been to the police.
Mr. Haines, in defence, said that at the time of the alleged
offence the landlady was away, and her sister-in-law Mrs. E.J. Pearson was in
charge of the house. She had received particular instructions not to serve
drunken persons, which instructions she had endeavoured to carry out. He should
call evidence to prove that when Spearpoint was served there was no indication
of his condition. Of course it was useless to contend that he was not drunk in
the face of the police evidence, but he did contend that the police knew the
man and the landlady did not, nor had she the opportunity of observing his
condition. Mr. Haines quoted cases in favour of his argument that he was
entitled to an acquittal on the ground that Mrs. Pearson did not knowingly
serve a drunken man.
Mrs. E.J. Pearson was then examined, and said that when
Spearpoint entered the bar she had no reason to believe he had been drinking
more than he ought. He drank part of his beer, sat down, and lit his pipe. She
believed the constable, when he entered, said to Spearpoint “Oh, so you are
here, are you?” She had no reason to ask the constable to remove the man, and
did not ask him to.
By the Chief Constable: To me the man seemed perfectly
sober. I may have said to the constable “Take him out”, but I do not remember
doing so,.
William Henry Dunn, an elderly man, who for many years was
coal checker at the Harbour, said he saw Spearpoint come in on the 12th
to the True Briton, and in his opinion the man seemed sober at the time.
A. Wooderson, a hobbler, living at 39, Mill Bay, gave
evidence to the same effect.
The Bench, however, considered the case proved, and imposed
the mitigated fine of £1 and 19s. costs. The licence was not endorsed.
The
following licensing transfer was granted: Mr. Carter takes over the Blue Anchor
(sic) (actually True Briton) from Miss Pearson.
Mr. Carter was granted a transfer of the licence of the True Briton.
Folkestone Express
26-1-1901
By The Way
It seems to be essential that public house attendants should
qualify themselves to diagnose the condition of their customers with regard to
their sobriety. So far as I can gather, the state of the law in this respect is
most unsatisfactory. A man may be drunk and not have any outward sign to enable
another person to recognise his condition, and if he is served in a public
house with liquor the proprietor is liable to penalties. It is not a condition
precedent to the offence that he shall know the man is drunk. The ability to
light his pipe properly seems to be one test.
Of course I am referring to the charge against Miss Pearson
of the True Briton Inn. I am sure everyone will sympathise with the lady, whose
health is such that she is obliged to go away for rest and change of air. Her
good nature, her generosity, and her charity are known to most people. To all
appeals for help for the deserving people in distress she turns a ready ear.
She has conducted her hotel in the most exemplary manner, but in her absence an
offence has been quit unintentionally committed, and notwithstanding the
eloquence with which extenuating circumstances were urged by her solicitor, a
small fine was imposed. In assuring her of the sympathy of the townspeople I
may express a hope that her health will be speedily restored.
Saturday, January 19th: before J. Fitness, W.G.
Herbert, and W. Wightwick Esqs., and Lieut. Colonel Hamilton.
Mary Pearson, of the True Briton Inn, was summoned for
supplying drink to a man when drunk. Mr. Haines said the defendant was ill at
Tunbridge Wells and could not appear.
P.C. Johnson said at 7.30 p.m. on the 12th inst.
he entered the public bar of the True Briton, kept by Mrs. Pearson. He saw Wm.
Spearpoint, a fisherman, there very drunk. He had a pint glass three parts full
of beer on the counter beside him. Spearpoint was sitting down and drank nearly
all the beer while witness was in the bar. Mrs. E.J. Pearson was behind the
bar. He asked her if she served the man, and she said “Yes”. He said “Do you see
the drunken condition he is in?” He said “I didn`t notice him when he first
came in, or I should not have served him. They are really such funny people you
can`t say when they are drunk – in fact I thought he was a foreigner”. She said
to Spearpoint “You had better go outside”. He refused to go, and witness said
“If you don`t go you are liable for refusing to quit licensed premises”. Miss
Pearson said “Would you mind seeing him out for me”. He removed Spearpoint from
the premises, and when outside he became very drunk and disorderly, and was
charged for that offence. Afterwards he saw Mrs. Pearson and told her he should
report Miss Pearson. She replied “Really I don`t know much about the business,
and Miss Pearson is away ill”. He had previously seen Spearpoint ejected from
the Queen`s Head by the landlord, and the Princess Royal. He was very drunk on
both occasions.
Cross-examined by Mr. Haines: Spearpoint was rolling about,
and after he saw him leave the Queen`s Head he followed him to the Princess
Royal. The barmaid said she did not serve him. He advised Spearpoint to go
home. He was very quiet. He could not find him in any of the other public
houses, and so looked in the True Briton. Spearpoint was sitting down and
smoking. P.C. Watson was with me all the time, and we were watching Spearpoint.
Spearpoint said “It strikes me you blokes are following me about”. He was very
quiet in the house. There was only one other man in the bar. Mrs. Pearson said
she had strict instructions not to serve any drunken people. I knew Spearpoint
had been drunk off and on for a month.
By Supt. Reeve: My instructions are, if I see a drunken man
go into a public house, to go in and caution the licence holder not to serve
him.
P.C. Watson gave corroborative evidence. He said he heard
Mrs. Pearson request Spearpoint to go out, and he refused, and she asked him
and Johnson to eject him, which they did. Previous to that, Pearson was ejected
from the Providence, Beach Street, by the landlord. He was then too drunk to
stand, and fell over, and was picked up by a friend and went as far as the
Wonder, in Beach Street, and was ejected by the landlord almost immediately. An
hour after, he entered the Queen`s Head, and was ejected by the landlord.
Afterwards he went to the Princess Royal, and was ejected. He was not
disorderly in any of the houses. At 7.30 they found him in the True Briton.
Cross-examined by Mr. Haines: Spearpoint was too drunk to
stand. When a man is like that we generally caution him or get a friend to take
him home. It did not strike us to go round all the houses and warn them that
there was a drunken man about. I knew Spearpoint was a notorious character.
Sergt. Osborne was called to prove that Spearpoint was very
drunk.
George Betts, living in Fenchurch Street, said Spearpoint
was three times drunk that day. He hadn`t been sober for about a fortnight.
There were no convictions against him during that time.
Mr. Haines said that the actual licensee was away, and her
sister had charge of the house. Spearpoint was a stranger to her, and in her
opinion he was sober. He was quiet and sat there smoking. She did not ask the
constables to eject him, but they said “Oh, you`re here – come on”. Miss
Pearson had conducted the house for 20 years, and no such offence had been
preferred against he before. He did not pretend to say the man was not drunk,
but he did not appear to be drunk to Mrs. Pearson, and he contended that the
police should have warned the publicans, because a man might pull himself
together and appear sober. He cited several cases in support of arguments he
advanced, and urged that there was no knowledge on the part of the defendant
that any offence was proved, and if “knowledge” were unnecessary no publican
would be safe. At Bow Street, on January 17th, he said there was an
exactly similar offence, before Mr. Marsham, who said there was no evidence
that the barman knew the man was drunk and dismissed the case.
Elizabeth Jane Pearson, sister-in-law of the licensee, said
Miss Pearson was away, and she was taking charge. Before she left, Miss Pearson
gave her very strict injunctions not to serve a drunken man. The customers were
strangers to her, and she had never seen Spearpoint before, and there was
nothing to lead her to suppose the man was not perfectly sober. She thought he
was sober, or would not have served him. He had been in the house five minutes
when the police went in. They said “Oh, you are here, are you?”, and a
constable took him out. She did not ask the police to see him out. She had no
reason to ask them to do so. The man was perfectly still.
By Supt. Reeve: The man was perfectly sober as far as I
could see. I thought he was a foreigner. If the constable had not put him out,
I should have allowed him to remain.
William Henry Dunn said he was in the True Briton when
Spearpoint went in. He did not know who he was. He asked for a pint of beer,
and was served. He said nothing, but sat down and smoked his pipe.
Mr. Wightwick: Did you see him light his pipe? – Yes, sir.
Did he light it all right – at the proper end? – Yes.
Mr. Haines: Did you take particular notice of the man as he
was lighting his pipe? – Yes, and he lit it all right.
Supt. Reeve: He didn`t go to the pump to light his pipe, did
he? (Laughter)
Witness: I thought he was a stranger belonging to one of the
ships in the harbour. He didn`t stumble or roll about.
Albert Wooderson, a hoveller, said he was in the house when
Spearpoint entered. He knew him as an old school fellow, but he was not a
friend of his. He said “Hello, Bill”, and he replied “Hello, Albert”. There was
nothing in his walk or speech or manner to lead him to suppose he was not
sober.
Mr. Wightwick: Did you see him light his pipe? – Yes.
How did he light it? – Just the same as we should (laughter)
– got up and took a piece of paper from the box, and lit his pipe from the gas.
The Magistrates retired, and on their return the Chairman
said they had given the matter their best consideration, and they thought the
case was proved. The penalty would therefore be 20s. (mitigated from £20) and
the costs 19s.
Mr. Haines: I take it there will be no record of conviction
on the licence?
The Chairman: We said nothing about that. The licence will
not be endorsed.
The Magistrates` Clerk: The Magistrates gave the fullest
consideration to your eloquent address, Mr. Haines.
Folkestone Herald
26-1-1901
Saturday, January 19th: Before Messrs. Fitness,
Wightwick and Herbert, and Lieut. Colonel Hamilton.
Mary Pearson, landlady of the True Briton public house, was
charged with having permitted drunkenness.
Mr. Haines, who represented defendant, said they admitted
the service. The landlady was away at the time under the hands of a doctor, and
she was still in Tunbridge Wells.
P.C. G.W. Johnson said at 7.30 p.m. on the 12th
inst., in company with P.C. Watson, he entered the public bar of the True
Briton public house, Harbour Street, where he saw William Spearpoint,
fisherman. He was very drunk, and had a pint glass three parts full of beer on
the counter beside him. He drank nearly all the beer during the time witness
was in the bar. Mrs. E.J. Pearson was behind the bar, and she said, in reply to
a question, that she had served the man, but did not notice his drunken
condition when he first went in, or she would not have served him. She said “They`re
really such funny people; you can`t say when they are drunk. I thought he was a
foreigner”. He refused to go outside, and Mrs. Pearson asked witness to see him
out. Witness ejected him, and afterwards had to take him to the police station.
When he went back and told Mrs. E.J. Pearson that the landlady would be
reported, she said she did not understand much about the business, and Miss
Pearson was away. Witness had seen Spearpoint earlier in the evening – just
after 7 – ejected from the Queen`s Head and Princess Royal Hotels. He was very
drunk then.
By Mr. Haines: It was true that Mrs. Pearson asked him to
eject Spearpoint. When Mrs. Pearson asked him to go out he said “Strikes me you
blokes are following me about tonight”. He was very quiet in the house. There
was only one man in the bar at the time. Mrs. Pearson did say she had had
strict instructions from Miss Pearson not to serve drunken people.
By Chief Constable Reeve: His instructions were that if he
saw a drunken man enter a public house to go in and warn the licensee. That was
what he was doing in this case.
P.C. Watson corroborated, and added that he had seen
Spearpoint ejected from the Providence, Beach Street. He was too drunk to stand
when outside, and fell over. A friend picked him up, and Spearpoint went into
the Wonder, where he was again ejected. After that he was sent home.
Sergt. Osborne stated that when prisoner was brought into
the police station at 7.50 on Saturday, the 12th, he was very drunk.
Mr. Haines, in defence, said he was going to call evidence
to prove that to all appearances the man was sober, and quoted several
judgements where the licensee was not responsible, although it was admitted
that the man served was drunk.
Mrs. Pearson said during the absence of her sister she had
taken charge of the True Briton. Previous to leaving, Miss Pearson had given
her strict instructions not to serve drunken men. When Spearpoint came in he
appeared to be perfectly sober, and if she had not thought so she would not
have served him. He had been in the house about five minutes when the constable
came in. She never asked the policeman to eject the man. One of the constables
said “Oh, you are here, are you?” She told the constables that she would never
have served him if she had thought he was drunk. They then took him out.
By Superintendent Reeve: She preferred not to answer a
question as to whether, from what she had heard that morning, she thought now
he was perfectly sober.
Wm. Hy. Dunn, High Street, said he had been a coal checker on
the Harbour for many years and was in the house when Spearpoint was served with
a pint of beer. He thought Spearpoint was all right.
A man named Albert Wooderson, of 39, Mill Bay, bore out the
statement of the last witness.
The Magistrates considered the case proved, and imposed a
fine of 20s. and 19s. costs. The licence would not be endorsed.
Folkestone Express
4-5-1901
Saturday, April 27th: Before J. Pledge, T.J.
Vaughan, and J. Stainer Esqs., and Lieut. Col. Westropp.
Geo. M. Carter was granted a transfer of the licence of the
True Briton, for many years held by Mary Pearson.
Folkestone Herald
4-5-1901
Saturday, April 27th: Before Alderman J. Pledge,
Messrs. Vaughan and Fitness, and Lieut. Col. Westropp.
The licence of the True Briton Inn was transferred until the
next licensing day from Mary Pearson to George M. Carter.
Folkestone Herald
8-6-1901
Felix
It has generally been admitted that if there has been one
licensed house well conducted in Folkestone these many years, it has been the
True Briton in Harbour Street. The lady who has presided over its destinies –
Miss Pearson – has always made it a great point that the old hostelry should be
worthy of the admiration of every “true Briton” that entered its portals. That
Miss Pearson has been successful in this endeavour is generally admitted. Let
it be the collier-worker, mariner, or the more polished gentleman, all alike
have a good word for this estimable lady. The sick, deserving poor, as I have
pointed out in these columns, have always found a friend in Miss Pearson. Her
acts prove this. For years she has made the largest individual collection for
the Hospital Saturday funds, and has often put to shame similar and larger
establishments of the twon. Never taking “No” for an answer, this lady`s
hospital subscription lists are standing records of what can be done if one
puts their whole heart into any particular form of work. Miss Pearson has now
laid aside the cares of business, and is living in retirement. Thither she is
followed by the good wishes of us all, and I may here express a hope, on behalf
of many Folkestone and other friends, that she may long be possessed of the
priceless pearl of good health in which to enjoy that peace and rest she well
deserves. Mr. Carter, who has taken over the reins of the True Briton, is a
gentleman of the “Queen`s steel” order. He was for several years in charge of
Messrs. W.H. Smith and Sons` bookstall at the Harbour Station, and served for a
long period in a similar position at Canterbury, where he is well known and
respected. If those qualities which go towards the making of a real sort of man
mean anything, then Mr. Carter is bound to succeed. He is, in fact “The True
Briton” personified.
Folkestone Chronicle
15-6-1901
Wednesday, June 12th: Before Messrs. Hoad,
Pursey, Wightwick, and Pledge, and Lieut. Col. Westropp.
Folkestone Express
15-6-1901
Wednesday, June 12th: Before J. Hoad, J. Pledge,
C.J. Pursey, and W. Wightwick Esqs., and Lieut. Col. W.K. Westropp.
Mr. Carter was granted a transfer of the licence of the True Briton.
Folkestone Daily News
14-10-1905
Saturday, October 14th: Before Messrs. W.G.
Herbert, W. Salter, and J. Stainer.
Mr. Carter, of the True Briton Hotel, applied for an
occasional for a Masonic dinner to be held on Wednesday next at Flessati`s
Restaurant. Granted.
Folkestone Herald
21-10-1905
Saturday, October 14th: Before Alderman W.G.
Herbert, Alderman W. Salter, and Mr. J. Stainer.
Mr. G.M. Carter, the licensee of the True Briton Hotel,
applied for an occasional licence to sell refreshments at Flessati`s Restaurant
on Wednesday evening on the occasion of a dinner. The dinner was to commence at
eight o`clock, and he applied for an extension until 12 o`clock. Permission was
granted.
Folkestone
Daily News 7-2-1907
Thursday, February 7th: Before Messrs.
Herbert, Pursey, Leggett, Stainer, Swoffer, and Hawksley.
John Maney and John McInery were charged with stealing
an automatic box and contents from the True Briton, Harbour Street.
George Carter said he was the landlord of the True
Briton, and recognised the prisoners. They came into the bar about five minutes
to six yesterday. He went and served them with drinks, and then returned to the
smoke room. A few minutes afterwards he returned to the bar, but the prisoners
had left. He had an automatic machine in the bar, which was fixed to the
counter, when the prisoners came in. He afterwards found it had been wrenched
off and taken away. He valued the machine at £2, and there was probably about
10s. to 15s. cash inside.
Charles Webster, 49, Greenfield Road, said he was in
the bar of the True Briton with the two prisoners last evening, and the
landlord served them with drink. They were the only ones in the bar, and
McInery said “We`d better have this down”, meaning the automatic machine, and
immediately took hold of the machine and wrenched it down. Witness said to him
“Don`t be a fool, Jack, you`re doing something that will get you six months if
you do”. Prisoner then put his coat over it, and asked witness to open the
door, which he refused to do. The other prisoner then opened the door and let
McInery out. Witness then told the landlord what he had seen, and went with him
to the ship Doric in the harbour, where he saw the prisoner McInery coming out
of the cabin. In the cabin he saw a lot of coppers in piles as if they had been
counted out in shillings. He asked McInery where the box was, and he said he
knew nothing about it and told witness to shut up. He advised him to take it
back to the landlord.
McInery said witness broke his knife in trying to get
the box off the counter, but this was denied by Webster.
Witness (continuing) said before the landlord left the
bar the prisoner McInery asked for a screwdriver in order to take the box down
for him, but the landlord said he could do it himself.
P.S. Osborne deposed at 6.15 last evening he went with
the last witness to the ship Doric. On going into the cabin he found some
pieces of wood burning, which appeared to belong to the box. At the back of the
stove he found the top of the box, and two penny pieces were lying on the
table. The prisoner Maney came into the cabin, and witness told him he should
take him into custody for stealing an automatic machine. Prisoner said he knew
nothing about it. Witness took him into custody, and afterwards returned to the
ship Doric, where he found a basin, containing coppers, under a bunk. He
afterwards apprehended McInery at the Brewery Tap, and in answer to the charge
he said “I was just going to finish my beer and was then coming to the police
station to give myself up”. Witness formally charged both the prisoners
together with the theft.
Webster (re-called) said the bunk under which the
sergeant found the money belonged to Maney.
Mr. Carter (re-called) said the prisoner McInery did
ask him for a screwdriver, but he told him he could take the machine down by
himself.
Prisoners had no questions to ask. Maney pleaded Not
Guilty, and McInery Guilty, the latter stating that he was in drink at the
time.
The Bench held a consultation for some time before they
could come to a decision, and then the Chairman sentenced McInery to 21 days`
hard labour, and fined Maney 20s. or 14 days`.
Folkestone
Express 9-2-1907
Thursday, February 7th: Before W.G. Herbert
Esq., Major Leggett, and J. Stainer, C.J. Pursey, G.I. Swoffer, and G.
Hawkesley Esqs.
John McInery and John Money were charged with stealing
an automatic ticket machine, value 40s., and 10s. in money, the property of Mr.
George M. Carter.
The men went into the True Briton Inn, and in the
presence of George Webster forced the machine from its position in the bar,
saying those machines were condemned. They took it on board the ship Doric.
McInery was sentenced to 21 days` hard labour, and
Money was fined 20s. or 14 days`.
Folkestone
Herald 9-2-1907
Thursday, February 7th: Before Alderman W.G.
Herbert, Major Leggett, Messrs. J. Stainer, G.I. Swoffer, C.J. Pursey, and G.
Hawkesley.
John Maney and John McInery were charged with stealing
an automatic box and its contents from the True Briton Hotel.
Mr. George Carter, landlord of the True Briton, Harbour
Street, said the prisoners entered the bar the previous afternoon about six
o`clock. He served them with drinks, and having done so he returned to the
smoke room. A few moments later he returned to the bar. The prisoners had then
left. A portion of an automatic machine was part of one which was intact when the
prisoners entered, but afterwards he saw that it had been wrenched off, and the
whole machine taken away. He estimated that the machine would cost £2 10s., and
there would probably be about 10s. or 15s. inside. It belonged to a London
firm, and he (witness) was the bailee of it.
Charles Webster, of 49, Greenfield Road, a labourer,
deposed that McInery said “We have got to have this (the automatic machine)
down; they were condemned today”. (Laughter) He then got hold of the top of it
and pulled it down. Witness said “Don`t be a fool, Jack. You are doing enough
to get yourself six months. Leave it alone”. McInery then put his coat over the
machine and said “Open the door”. Witness refused. Maney then opened the door,
and followed the other prisoner out, saying that he was coming back. Witness
called the landlord and told him about the affair. Together they went to a
collier called the Doric in the harbour. They looked into the cabin, and saw a
lot of coppers counted out on the table. Only McInery could be seen, and
witness asked him where the machine was. He replied “I don`t know nothing about
it. Shut up”. Maney did not assist in taking the machine down, but when McInery
was moving it, Maney said “I`ll take the responsibility”. Before the landlord
left the bar, McInery asked the landlord for a screwdriver to take the machine
down for him, but the landlord answered “Never mind, I can do that for myself,
as I have plenty of time”. McInery said “We want to earn a drink”.
P.S. Osborne deposed to visiting the barque Doric. In
the cabin there was a fire burning, and on it were some pieces of wood that
compared with the wood on the remainder of the machine. At the back of the
stove he found the top of the machine. Two pennies were lying on the table. The
prisoner Maney then entered the cabin, and witness took him into custody. He
replied to the charge that he knew nothing about it. Returning to the Doric, in
a basin, under a bunk, he found seven and tenpence in pennies. About half past
eight witness arrested McInery at the Brewery Tap. He replied “I am just going
to finish my beer, and then I was coming to the police station to give myself
up”. In Maney`s possession over fifteen shillings in silver was found, and on
McInery there were eleven penny pieces and a sixpence. As he put the money on
the counter, prisoner pointed out to the coppers, saying “That didn`t come out
of that”, meaning the machine.
The witness Webster, re-called, said that he was
present when Sergt. Osborne found the money in the basin. He knew that Maney
alone occupied that cabin.
The landlord, re-called, said Mcinery asked him for a
screwdriver to take down the machine, as those machines were condemned, witness
understanding that he referred to the action of the Licensing Justices that
day. Witness replied that he was about to take them down himself. McInery then
said that they thought they might earn a drink, and witness told him they could
have a drink.
Maney pleaded Not Guilty, but McInery pleaded Guilty,
saying that he was willing to repay Mr. Carter.
The Bench sentenced McInery to 21 days` imprisonment,
and fined Maney 20s. or 14 days`.
Folkestone
Daily News 29-5-1907
Wednesday, May 29th: Before Messrs. Herbert,
Pursey, Ames, Leggett, Fynmore, Linton, and Boyd.
Mr. G.W. Haines applied on behalf of the owners of the
True Briton Hotel (Messrs. Ash and Co.) to be allowed to make certain
alterations in accordance with plans produced. Mr. Bromley explained the plans,
and the application was granted.
Folkestone
Express 1-6-1907
Wednesday, May 29th: Before W.G. Herbert
Esq., Lieut. Col. Fynmore, Major Leggatt, C.J. Pursey, T. Ames, G. Boyd, and
R.J. Linton Esqs.
Mr. G.W. Haines made an application with regard to some
alterations at the True Briton Hotel, Harbour Street. The alterations were
extensive, involving an outlay of £200 or £300.
The Magistrates, having inspected the plans, approved
them.
Folkestone
Herald 1-6-1907
Wednesday, May 29th: Before Mr. W.G.
Herbert, Major Leggett, Messrs. C.J. Pursey, T. Ames, R.J. Fynmore, R.J.
Linton, and Councillor G. Boyd.
Mr. G.W. Haines applied for the approval of certain
alterations to the True Briton, Harbour Street. They would, he said, cost
between £200 and £300. Mr. A. Bromley, the architect, produced the plans, and
the application was granted.
Folkestone
Express 11-9-1909
Saturday, September 4th: Before Mr. E.T.
Ward, Alderman Vaughan, and Lieut. Colonel Fynmore.
George Bumstead, a fisherman, was charged with being
drunk and incapable. He pleaded Guilty.
P.C. Styles said at about 9.40 the previous evening he
was on duty in Harbour Street, when he saw the prisoner stagger out of the door
of the True Briton Hotel. He fell in the passage way, and witness assisted him
to his feet. He staggered off towards the Harbour wall, where he fell again.
Witness then took him into custody, and with assistance brought him to the
police station.
The Chairman enquired whether the prisoner had been
served with drink at the True Briton.
Styles replied that the landlord had refused him.
Fined 2s. 6d. and 4s. 6d. costs, or seven days`.
No comments:
Post a Comment