Folkestone Chronicle
10-1-1880
Quarter Sessions
Thursday, January 8th: Before J.J. Lonsdale Esq.
George Bumpstead, 30, surrendered to his bail, charged with
unlawfully wounding William Higgins on 13th November, who
prosecuted.
Mr. Stuart Sankey, having detailed the facts of the case,
called William Higgins, who deposed that on Thursday night, Nov. 13th,
about a quarter past eleven, he was at the harbour in company with a man named
May. He saw defendant in a boat near the jetty, and May asked him to leave the
boat, and he refused. Prisoner came to the jetty and struck him, May`s son, and
a man named William Cornish. He came ashore and said he should strike every man
that was there. When he came to strike old May with his hand, he stepped
between them and received the blow in his face. He returned the blow and
knocked him down. He lay there about three minutes, and he then got up and
struck him in the ribs, and afterwards on the shoulder. He found he had lost
the use of his arm and ran away. He did not see anything in prisoner`s hand. He
went into the Star Inn, in Radnor Street, and when there, found that he was
bleeding from the shoulder and the ribs. He found he had been stabbed. Dr.
Perry was sent for and bound up the wounds. He was laid up for three weeks.
Cross-examined by prisoner: It was about eleven o`clock. The
four cuts were received in the scuffle. I did not see the knife in your hand;
did not know that I was cut until afterwards.
James May, the owner of the boat, gave corroborative
evidence. The first intimation he had of prosecutor being stabbed was when he
told him, but he saw no knife used.
Cross-examined by prisoner: I heard prisoner crying out
“There are four of them murdering me”.
Mr. Sankey: There were four of you murdering him?
May: Lor! No, sir, not one of us lifted our hand against him
(Laughter)
Edward May and William Cornish gave confirmatory evidence.
Dr. Charles Perry, sworn, said that on the occasion referred
to he was called to see the prosecutor at the Star public house in Radnor
Street. He examined him and found a deep wound nearly three inches long on the
left shoulder joint, extending nearly to the bone. Another wound he found in
the muscles of the back, below the left ribs, and a small wound on the ring
finger of the right hand. The wounds were caused by some sharp instrument. The
wound under the ribs might have been a dangerous wound if it had been deeper.
P.C. Hills deposed to apprehending prisoner, when his father
said to him “What does all this mean?”, and prisoner replied “I have stabbed a
man”.
In defence, prisoner stated that he saw his father from the
jetty, in his boat from Hastings, when his father called to him to come aboard.
The four men then came down, and they had a scuffle when he took out his knife
to cut the painter, and whilst engaged in this act, defendant threw himself
upon him, when he must have met with the injuries he received.
Thomas White, a lad, deposed to hearing a scuffle, and also
the voice of prisoner`s father calling upon him to cut the painter and set the
boat loose.
Alfred Bumpstead, father of the prisoner, said he told
prisoner to go round and get a punt, and when he heard the scuffle, told him to
get a knife and cut the painter.
The Recorder, in summing up, said the Jury must recollect
there had been a scuffle, but on the other hand, could four separate wounds,
such as prosecutor had received in that fray, and one of the wounds, if it had
gone a little deeper, would in all probability have terminated fatally. First they
must consider whether this was the result of accident, and secondly, whether
the danger was such as to justify him using it in self-defence.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and after an
elapse of about a quarter of an hour, returned with a verdict of Guilty.
Asked whether he had anything to say why sentence should not
be passed upon him, prisoner answered “I have nothing more to say”.
The Recorder said that he quite concurred with the verdict.
He should not make any remarks upon it. This was the first case he remembered
of the use of the knife being brought before that Court. He was informed that
he was not a Folkestone man.
Prisoner: No, sir.
The Recorder: I am glad to hear it. The sentence I shall
pass upon you is that you be imprisoned for two years with hard labour.
The sentence seemed to excite considerable surprise in
Court.
Folkestone Express
10-1-1880
Quarter Sessions
Thursday, January 8th: Before The Recorder.
George Bumpstead, a fisherman, of Hastings, on bail, was
indicted for unlawfully wounding William Higgins at Folkestone on the 13th
November, 1879. A true bill was returned by the Grand Jury. He pleaded Not
Guilty.
Mr. Stuart Sankey prosecuted, and the prisoner was
undefended. The following evidence was taken:
William Higgins said he was a seaman, living in Folkestone.
On the 13th November, about a quarter before eleven, he went to see
if their boat was going to sea. Not seeing anybody on the back way, he went to
the Star public house and saw the captain. He then went to the jetty, and heard
May, the owner of the ferry boat, calling to the prisoner, who was in the boat,
to bring it back. He replied that he should bring it back when he liked.
Witness went to the jetty to receive the boat when prisoner brought it back, but
prisoner struck at May with an oar, which fell overboard. Prisoner then came
ashore and wanted to fight, and as he was about to strike May, who is an old
man, witness got between them and received the blow, returning it and knocking
prisoner down. Prisoner was on the ground two or three minutes, and then got up
and struck witness again. It was not a light night. Prisoner struck him first
in the ribs, and then on the shoulder. Finding he had lost the use of his arm,
witness ran away and went to the Star public house. Dr. Perry was called, and
he bound up the wounds, one of which had to be sewn up. He had not known
prisoner previously, and there had been no cause of quarrel between them. When
prisoner was in the boat he had no knife. Witness was ill three weeks.
In cross-examination by prisoner, witness said he was on the
lower landing with May`s son when the boat came in. Neither of them said “Now
we are here we`ll give you something”. Prisoner did not try to push the boat
off again, and young May did not threaten to throw him out. Did not hear the
prisoner call out to his father. When prisoner jumped up, witness did not jump
on the top of him. Witness received the wounds while they were scuffling, and
did not feel them until he had lost the use of his arm.
James May said he had not given prisoner leave to use the
ferry boat, and asked him to get out, but he refused, saying he would not get
out till he thought proper, using very bad language. Witness then went to the
Star to call his son, and when they returned Higgins followed. Witness saw the
scuffle, but did not notice any knife in prisoner`s hands. Prisoner called for
his father, and witness laughed at him, saying he had got his boat and didn`t
care. Afterwards he heard Higgins say he was stabbed. In reply to prisoner,
witness said he heard prisoner call out to his father to come ashore as “there
were four of them murdering him”. Did not hear his father answer, nor did he
see prisoner get up after he was knocked down.
In re-examination, witness said not one of them touched him
besides Higgins. It was not true that four were attacking prisoner.
Edward May, son of last witness, gave evidence of a similar
purport. He did not threaten to throw prisoner overboard. He saw the prisoner
in the boat, but could not say if he had a knife in his hand or not.
In reply to prisoner, witness said his father was on the
upper landing when he struck at him. He got into the boat and made it fast
after prisoner got out.
William Cornish corroborated some parts of the foregoing
evidence, but he left just as the second scuffle commenced.
Dr. Perry said he was called to see the prosecutor. He found
him suffering from a wound on the left shoulder joint about three inches long
and 1½ in. deep, extending nearly to the bone, another about two inches long
beneath the left ribs, but not a deep one or it would have been dangerous.
There was another flesh wound in the muscles of the back, apparently caused by
a blow given from the side, and another on the third finger of the right hand.
The wounds were evidently made by blows from a sharp instrument given with
great force. They could not have been caused by accident.
In reply to prisoner, witness said the wound under the fifth
rib was caused in all probability by the knife just catching the skin as it was
struck upwards.
P.C. William Hills said prisoner`s father came to see him in
the police station, and asked him if he should telegraph to his mother.
Prisoner made no reply. His father then asked what it all meant, and he replied
“I`ve stabbed a man”.
This was the case for the prosecution.
Prisoner, in his defence, said he called to his father to
send a boat in, and he told him to go round the jetty and borrow a boat. He did
so, and when he got half way between the jetty and his own boat he heard
someone call out to bring it back, and four of them who were there threatened
him. He therefore tried to push off, but the oar slipped into the water. He
called out to his father that four men were murdering him, and his father
helloed to him to take out his knife and cut the painter of the boat and get
away. He did so, and prosecutor threw himself on the knife and cut himself. He
did not know prosecutor was cut until the next morning.
He called Thomas White, a lad, who said he heard prisoner
call to his father to haul the boat in so that he might get aboard. He heard
some men threaten him when he took the boat back, and heard him call out to his
father the men were murdering him. Prisoner had his arm cut, and was wet
through.
In cross-examination witness said he could hear distinctly
all that took place on the top landing. He did not see any knife, nor did he
see prosecutor fall on prisoner.
Alfred Bumpstead, father of the prisoner, said he told his
son to borrow a punt. He heard the row on the jetty, and he called out to his
son to get a knife and cut the “painter” and come aboard.
In reply to the Recorder he said he did not see any scuffle
after he called out to cut the boat loose.
The Recorder summed up, telling the jury if they believed
Hills, the prisoner said he had stabbed a man, and therefore there could be no
doubt about that fact. It was quite unimportant who began the scuffle. They
would have to say if the stabbing was an accident, or whether prisoner was in
danger of his life and justified in using the knife.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty and the Recorder
sentenced him to two years` with hard labour. The Recorder remarked that he
quite concurred with the verdict. He would not comment on the case further than
to say that the practice of using the knife was most reprehensible, and must be
resolutely put down. Happily it was not of frequent occurrence, and during his
Recordership he had never before had a case of stabbing to adjudicate upon. He
was happy to find in the present case that the prisoner was not a Folkestone
man.
The Court then rose.
Southeastern Gazette
10-1-1880
Quarter Sessions
On Thursday morning
Folkestone Quarter Sessions were held at the Town-hall, before the Recorder, J.
J. Lonsdale, Esq.
George Bumpstead, of
Hastings, fisherman, was charged with unlawfully wounding William Higgins, at
Folkestone, on November 13th, 1879. Mr. Sankey prosecuted.
Prosecutor said
he was a seaman and lived at Folkestone. On Thursday evening, the 18th
November, at about a quarter-past eleven, he was at the harbour in company with
a man named James May. He saw the defendant in a boat near the jetty, and May
asked him to leave the boat as it was his, but he refused. Prisoner subsequently
came to the jetty and struck witness, May’s son, and a man named Cornish. He
came ashore and said, with an oath, that he would fight every man that was
there. He struck at May, when witness stepped between them and received the
blow in his face. He returned the blow and knocked him down. He laid on the
ground for two or three minutes, and then got up and struck witness again in
the ribs and immediately after on the shoulder. He found that he had lost the
use of his arm. Witness went into the Star public-house in Radnor Street, and
there found he was bleeding from the shoulder and the ribs. He had been stabbed.
Dr. Perry afterwards sewed up the wound on the shoulder and bandaged the other
places.
Dr. Perry now
said he examined the prosecutor and found a deep wound, three inches long, on
the left shoulder joint extending nearly to the bone. Another wound he found in
the muscles of the back, and another, about two inches long, below the fifth
rib, as well as a small one on the ring finger. The injuries were evidently
caused by some sharp instrument such as a knife. They must have been given with
a great deal of force.
The prisoner, who
was undefended, said that when he came ashore the prosecutor and three others
set upon him, and he called out to his father, who was on board, to come and
help him. His father replied that he could not get ashore but told him to get
his knife and out the painter of the boat and come aboard. He attempted to do
so, but prosecutor threw himself upon him, and no doubt by that means was out
with it.
The jury returned
a verdict of guilty, and prisoner was sentenced to two years’ hard labour.
Folkestone Express
7-8-1880
Wednesday, August 4th: Before General Cannon and
R.W. Boarer Esq.
James Spearpoint was summoned for assaulting Sarah Warman,
landlady of the Star public house. The assault was of a trifling nature and the
Bench dismissed the case.
Southeastern Gazette
5-12-1881
Local News
On Saturday,
before General Armstrong, C.B., Captain Crowe, R.W. Boarer, Esq, Alderman
Banks, F. Boykett, Esq., and Captain Fletcher, Charles Stone and Richard
Reynolds were summoned for assaulting Richard Hart, on Nov. 26.
Richard Hart said
he was a seaman on board the Clementine. On Saturday night he had just come out
of the Star Inn, Radnor Street, when he was met by Stone who “up” with his fist
and knocked him down. He had given him no provocation. On getting up Reynolds
struck him with his fist in the face. Witness became insensible and knew
nothing more until he was carried into a woman’s house near. He did not see the
defendants in the Star. He saw a man named Spearpoint there. He did not see the
defendants sitting at a table; he did not knock their beer off the table. He
did not challenge them to fight. He did not fight, and a policeman did not
separate them.
Mr. Minter addressed the Bench for the
defence, and called the defendant Reynolds, who said he was the mate on board
the Flirt. On Saturday night Stone and he went into the Star about twenty
minutes past ten. As they were coming out Hart stood in the passage and would
not let anyone pass. He said he would fight the best man in the house. Stone
said “Get outside”. Witness said to Hart “Dicky, let me come out,” and he replied
‘’Yes, I don’t want any row with you,” and he let him out. They then went to
the Ship and stayed until eleven o’clock. On coming out they saw Hart and
William Spearpoint. Hart said “Where are those ----?” Stone went to him and
they commenced to fight. He (witness) did not interfere with Hart at all. Hart
and Stone fought for about ten minutes. He did not see the finish because he
was fighting with Spearpoint.
Complainant,
recalled, said, in answer to the Bench, he did ask a man named Ford to hold his
coat, but he had been previously knocked down by Stone.
The Bench
dismissed the case against Reynolds, and inflicted a fine of 40s., oosts 13s.,
or one month’s hard labour on Stone.
Folkestone Chronicle
10-12-1881
Saturday, December 3rd: Before General Armstrong
C.B., Capt. Crowe, Capt. Fletcher, Alderman Banks, R. W. Boarer, and F. Boykett
Esqs.
Charles Stone and Richard Reynolds were summoned for
assaulting Richard Hart on November 26th. They pleaded not guilty.
Mr. Minter defended.
Richard Hart said he was a seaman on board the Clementina.
On the night of Saturday, November 26th, in Radnor Street, about
eleven o`clock, he had just come out of the Star, when he was met by Stone, who
up with his fist and knocked him down. He had given him no provocation. On
getting up, Reynolds struck him with his fist in the face. Witness became
insensible, and he knew nothing more until he was carried into a woman`s house
near. The defendants worked on board a schooner. He had seen them in the
daytime, but had said nothing to them. The black eye and the marks he bore on
his face were the result of the assault.
Cross-examined: He did not see the defendants in the Star.
He saw a man named Spearpoint there. He did not see the defendants sitting at a
table; he did not knock their beer off the table. He went to the Ship
afterwards, but did not call out “Where are the ----?“. He did not fight, and a
policeman did not separate them. He did not go into the Star, throw off his
oilskin and say “I will fight the best ---- here”.
Jane May said she lived at 31, Radnor Street. She was in the
street on Saturday night and saw Stone on the top of the complainant, punching
him. Reynolds had got his coat off, and was about to kick Hart when she pulled
him back. Her husband parted Stone and Hart, and picked Hart up and brought him into the house. He
was bleeding from the ears, nose, and mouth, and could not see out of his eyes.
He was quite insensible. Sergeant Butcher and police constable Knowles
subsequently came in.
Elizabeth Jeffery gave corroborative evidence.
Mr. Minter addressed the Bench for the defence, and called
the defendant Reynolds, who said he was the mate on board the Flirt. On
Saturday night Stone and he went into the Star about twenty minutes past ten.
As they were coming out Hart stood in the passage and would not let anyone
pass. He said he would fight the best man in the house. Stone had got outside.
Witness said to Hart “Dicky, let me come out”, and he replied “Yes, I don`t
want any row with you”, and he let him out. They then went to the Ship and
stayed until eleven o`clock. On coming out they saw Hart and William Spearpoint.
Hart said “Where are those ----?”. Stone went to him and they commenced to
fight. He (witness) did not interfere with Hart at all. Hart and Stone fought
for about 10 minutes. He did not see the finish because he was fighting with
Spearpoint.
Robert Lepper, a bricklayer, also gave evidence.
Complainant, re-called, said in answer to the Bench, he did
ask a man named Ford to hold his coat, but he had previously been knocked down
by Stone.
The Bench dismissed the case against Reynolds, and inflicted
a fine of 40s. and 13s. costs, or one month`s hard labour, on Stone.
Folkestone Express
10-12-1881
Saturday, December 3rd: Before General Armstrong,
Captain Crowe, Alderman Banks, R.W. Boarer and F. Boykett Esqs.
Charles Stone and Richard Reynolds were charged with
assaulting Richard Hart on the 26th November.
Mr. Minter appeared for the defendants.
The complainant is a seaman on board the S.E.R. Clementine.
He stated that he was in Radnor Street just before eleven o`clock on Saturday
night. He left the Star Inn to go on board his ship, and just outside met
Stone, who knocked him down. Neither of them spoke. Complainant got up, and
Stone and Reynolds both struck him again with their fists. They all three fell
down, and he (the complainant) became insensible and was carried into some
woman`s house. He knew the defendants by sight and had worked with them. They
belonged to the Flirt schooner. He had had no quarrel with them. He saw them in
the day time working coals about 12 o`clock, but did not speak to them.
Complainant still bore the marks of the injuries he received
at the hands of the defendants.
In cross-examination complainant said: I first saw the
defendants about a quarter to 11 going into the Star. I saw Spearpoint in the
Star. The defendants were not sitting down when I went in, nor did I or
Spearpoint knock their beer off the table. I do not know if they went to the Ship.
I went by the Star on my way to the harbour. I did not throw my oilskin and say
“Where is the ----?”, and I only fought with them in self defence. We did not
have a regular round, nor did a policeman separate us. Spearpoind did not, so
far as I know, fight with Reynolds. I did not go into the Star, throw my
oilskin off, and say “I`ll fight the best b---- here”.
Jane May, of 31, Radnor Street, said she was in the street
about 11 o`clock and saw the defendants there. Stone was on the top of Hart,
punching him on the ground. She did not see the commencement of the affray.
Reynolds had his coat off, going to fight, saying he was “the master piece of
the street”. He appeared to be about to kick Hart, and witness pulled him back,
tearing his shirt off. Stone and Hart were parted by her husband and another
man. They picked Hart up and took him into witness`s house. He was bleeding
from the nose and ears, and could not see out of either eye. He was quite
insensible. P.C. Knowles and Sergeant Butcher saw him in that condition. The
defendants did not appear to be much the worse for drink.
Elizabeth Jeffrey, living at 7, Radnor Street, said she saw
the two defendants. Stone had Hart on the ground, but she could not see what he
was doing to him. She assisted to get Hart into Mrs. May`s house.
Mr. Minter said the defence would be that there was a
quarrel and a fight, the complainant being the actual aggressor. He got the
worst of the fight, and had no right to come to the Bench for redress. He
called Charles Reynolds as a witness, who said: I am mate of a cessel, and
belong to Maidstone. On Saturday I was in company with Stone. We went to the
Ship, and about twenty minutes past ten we went to the Star. We called for
three pints of beer for three of us. Whilst we were sitting there William
Spearpoint came in, but Hart did not. Spearpoint commenced to kick up a row
with his father. Hart was in the passage at the bar. He would let no-one pass.
He said “I`ll fight the best man in the house”. I said to him “Dicky, let me
come past”. He said “Yes, I don`t want to have any row with you”. Stone was
just outside. I and Stone then went to the Ship and remained there until eleven
o`clock. We came out and saw Hart and William Spearpoint. Hart said “Where are
the ----?” I don`t recollect Stone saying anything. Hart threw down his
oilskins and they commenced to fight. I did not interfere. Spearpoint was
coming to hit me. He said “Where`s that Charley?” I said “Here I am”, and I
struck him first. Hart and Stone fought for about ten minutes. They fell
several times. I did not see the finish of it as I was fighting with
Spearpoint. I did not see who struck the first blow.
Robert Lepper, a bricklayer, who was in the Ship on Saturday
night, said he saw Hart and Stone fighting together for ten minutes. They were
falling about on the kerb stones. He could not say which struck the first blow.
Complainant was then re-called at the request of Mr. Minter,
and the Bench asked him if he did not ask Mr. Ford to hold his coat. He
admitted that he did so, but it was after he had been struck and knocked down
by Stone. He fought to defend himself.
Stone was then called as a witness for Reynolds by Mr.
Minter, but the Bench intimated that they were unanimously of opinion that the
case against Reynolds should be dismissed.
The Bench took some time coming to a decision, and the
chairman then stated that they were divided as to whether they ought not to
commit Stone to prison without the option of a fine. It was a most gross case,
the complainant having been unwarrantably attacked when proceeding on a rough
night to make his vessel secure. Defendant would be fined 40s., and costs 13s.,
or one month`s hard labour in default.
Folkestone Express
1-11-1884
Wednesday, October 29th: Before Captain Crowe, F.
Boykett and A.M. Watkin Esqs.
Transfer Of Licence
The licence of the Star, Radnor Street, was transferred to
Robert Carter
Folkestone News
1-8-1885
Saturday, July 25th: Before The Mayor, J. Holden
and J. Fitness Esqs., and Alderman Caister.
Lucy Spearpoint was summoned for assaulting Lucy Carter on
the 18th of July.
In reply to the Magistrates` Clerk, complainant said they
could not settle their differences privately.
Complainant, who lives at the Star Inn, Radnor Street, said
she sent her servant to ask Mrs. Spearpoint “to pay what she owed”. Mrs.
Spearpoint did not send it, and complainant then went herself. Defendant used
foul language and asked her what she wanted, and said if she wasn`t off she
would throw a jug of water over her, and immediately did so. The water “spoilt
her brand new dress”. Defendant went on Monday and wanted to settle it, but she
declined.
Alice Bowden, the servant who was sent to ask defendant for
the money, said she saw Mrs. Spearpoint come from the tap in the market with a
jug of water, which she threw over Mrs. Carter.
Defendant denied the assault, and called her daughter, a
little girl, who said Mrs. Carter struck her mother in the face with her fist.
She was going to strike her again, when her mother threw half a pint of tea
over her.
The Bench dismissed the summons, each party having to pay
her own costs.
No comments:
Post a Comment