Memories from the pubs in and around Folkestone, with contemporary newspaper reports.
Thanks And Acknowledgements
My thanks go to Kent Libraries and Archives - Folkestone Library and also to the archive of the Folkestone Herald. For articles from the Folkestone Observer, my thanks go to the Kent Messenger Group. Southeastern Gazette articles are from UKPress Online, and Kentish Gazette articles are from the British Newspaper Archive. See links below.
Paul Skelton`s great site for research on pubs in Kent is also linked
Other sites which may be of interest are the Folkestone and District Local History Society, the Kent History Forum, Christine Warren`s fascinating site, Folkestone Then And Now, and Step Short, where I originally found the photo of the bomb-damaged former Langton`s Brewery, links also below.
Paul Skelton`s great site for research on pubs in Kent is also linked
Other sites which may be of interest are the Folkestone and District Local History Society, the Kent History Forum, Christine Warren`s fascinating site, Folkestone Then And Now, and Step Short, where I originally found the photo of the bomb-damaged former Langton`s Brewery, links also below.
Welcome
Welcome to Even More Tales From The Tap Room.
Core dates and information on licensees tenure are taken from Martin Easdown and Eamonn Rooney`s two fine books on the pubs of Folkestone, Tales From The Tap Room and More Tales From The Tap Room - unfortunately now out of print. Dates for the tenure of licensees are taken from the very limited editions called Bastions Of The Bar and More Bastions Of The Bar, which were given free to very early purchasers of the books.
Easiest navigation of the site is by clicking on the PAGE of the pub you are looking for and following the links to the different sub-pages. Using the LABELS is, I`m afraid, not at all user-friendly.
Contrast Note
Whilst the above-mentioned books and supplements represent an enormous amount of research over many years, it is almost inevitable that further research will throw up some differences to the published works. Where these have been found, I have noted them. This is not intended to detract in any way from previous research, but merely to indicate that (possible) new information is available.
Contribute
If you have any anecdotes or photographs of the pubs featured in this Blog and would like to share them, please mail me at: jancpedersen@googlemail.com.
If you`ve enjoyed your visit here, why not buy me a pint, using the button at the end of the "Labels" section?
If you`ve enjoyed your visit here, why not buy me a pint, using the button at the end of the "Labels" section?
Search This Blog
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
Updates
16th July, 2014: Due to very extensive research leaving no time for transcribing posts there will be no update until the start of August.
Saturday, 12 July 2014
Updates
12th July, 2014: Folkestone Express and Folkestone Herald Reports for 1934 Added.
General Licensing Notes 1930 - 1934
Folkestone
Express 15-2-1930
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 12th: Before Col. G.P.
Owen, Mr. G.I. Swoffer, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Miss A.M. Hunt, Mr. W. Griffin, Mrs.
E. Gore, Mr. R. Stokes, Mr. F. Seagar, and Eng. Rear-Admiral Stephens.
The Chief Constable presented his report as follows: I
have the honour to present my seventh annual report relating to the
administration of the Licensing Laws within the Borough for the year ending 31st
December, 1929.
Licensed Premises: There are in the Borough 114
premises licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor, the number being made up
as follows: Full licences 69; beer on 7; beer off 11; beer and spirits dealers
9; grocers, etc., off 6; confectioners wine on 3; cider and sweets off 2;
chemists wine off 7; total 114; 79 on and 35 off. No licensed premises were
referred back on the ground of redundancy by the Annual Licensing Committee.
Alehouse Licences: Of the alehouse licences, one is a
six day licence.
Licences transferred: The following licences were
transferred during the year: Prince Albert, Imperial Hotel, Railway Bell, Foord
Tavern, Bouverie Hotel, Castle Inn, Shakespeare Hotel, Gun Tavern, British
Lion, Red Cow.
Alterations to Licensed Premises: Structural
alterations have been sanctioned by the Bench during the year in connection
with the Clarendon Hotel and the Princess Royal.
Occasional Licences: Forty one occasional licences were
granted to licence holders to sell intoxicating liquor other than on their own
licensed premises.
Extension of Licensing Hours: Three hundred and eighty
eight extensions have been granted to licence holders when dinners, etc., were
being held on their licensed premises, and in no case has any abuse of the
privilege been recorded.
Proceedings Against Licence Holders: On the 13th
August last a licensee was proceeded against in the Borough Police Court for
selling intoxicating liquor during non-permitted hours; at 11.20 p.m. on the 3rd
August, 1929. For this offence he was convicted and fined the sum of £5 by the
Justices. The person referred to does not now hold a licence in this Borough,
the premises since having been transferred to another licensee.
Visits by Police to Licensed Premises: All licensed
premises have been periodically visited at irregular intervals by my officers
during the year, to see that they are being conducted in a satisfactory manner,
and with the above exception no adverse reports have been submitted to me. The
number of visits was 1,385.
Drunkenness: During the year 21 persons (17 males and 4
females) were proceeded against in the Borough Police Court for drunkenness.
This is a decrease of 13 as compared with the preceding year. Of the 21 cases
dealt with by the Court, 11 were residents of the Borough, 2 non-residents, 6
of no fixed abode, and 2 soldiers.
Comparative Return of Drunkenness: The following table
shows a comparative return of drunkenness with towns similarly situated to
Folkestone: Folkestone: Population 37,535; proceeded against 21; convicted 8;
discharged 13; number proceeded against per 1,000 population .55; Margate
46,480, 33, 21, 12, and .71; Gravesend 31,171, 85, 79, 6, and 2.7; Chester
40,802, 63, 47, 16, and 1.54; Cambridge 59,264, 19, 15, 4, and .32; Canterbury
23,737, 23, 17, 6, and .96; Hastings 66,611, 47, 37, 10, and .7; Scarborough
46,179, 33, 24, 9, and .71; Hove 47,507, 14, 6, 8, and .294; Bedford 40,242,
47, 44, 3, and 1.16; Ramsgate 36,561, 23, 9, 14, and .62. It will be seen by
the above table that Folkestone comes very high in sobriety amongst the towns
mentioned.
Permitted Hours: The permitted hours as allowed by the
Licensing Act of 1921 have been fixed by the Licensing Justices for this
borough, as under: Weekdays – from 10.30 a.m. to 2.30 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to
10 p.m. Sundays – from 12 noon to 2 p.m. and from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. During the
months of June, July, August, and September, 1929, the extension of half an
hour on weekdays from 10 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. was again granted by the Bench, and
I am pleased to say that no ill-effects have been observed.
Clubs: Nineteen clubs where intoxicating liquor is
supplied are registered under the Act. This is an increase of two as compared
with the preceding year, namely Mary`s Bridge Club, 106, Cheriton Road, which
was registered on the 4th October, 1929, and the 234th
Howitzer Battery R.A. (T) Recreation Club, Drill Halls, Shellons Street,
registered on the 28th October, 1929. The Bath Bridge and Social
Club, 12 and 14, Clifton Crescent, was registered on the 8th April,
1929. This ceased to be a club on the 5th December last, upon the
premises changing hands. One club was entered under a Justices` warrant on the
18th May, 1929, for suspected breaches of the Licensing Laws.
Sufficient evidence, however, was not obtainable to proceed with for a breach
of the Intoxicating Liquor Laws, but four gaming machines were found upon the
premises, and evidence was secured of their continued use. Proceedings were
therefore taken under the Gaming House Act, 1854, against the Secretary, who
was eventually fined for this offence. In this connection, I would point out
that the Secretary was especially warned on the 12th March, 1927,
that the use of these machines constituted unlawful gaming, and that unless
they were removed from the Club premises proceedings would follow. He gave a
specific undertaking that they would be removed forthwith, and relying upon
this, and having no evidence to the contrary, no means under the existing laws
of obtaining it, it was with considerable surprise we found the machines in use
when the Club was entered under warrant as before mentioned. It should be noted
that Police have no right of entering Club premises without a warrant, and a
warrant cannot be obtained unless the police are able to show reasonable
suspicion that the law is being broken.
Hotels: Six hotels and two restaurants have authority
under Section III of the Licensing Act, 1921, to supply intoxicating liquor
with meals for one hour after 10 p.m. on weekdays, namely; Metropole Hotel,
Grand Hotel, Majestic Hotel, Regina Hotel, Esplanade Hotel, Royal Pavilion
Hotel, Central Cafe and Savoy Cafe. This is an increase of one as compared with
last year, the certificate under Section III of the Licensing Act being granted
by the Justices in respect of the Savoy Cafe on the 6th February,
1929.
Music and Dancing: Forty two licences for music and
dancing have been granted or renewed under the provisions of Part IV of the
Public Health (Amendment) Act, 1890. Of this number, nine are for the use of
wireless sets for public entertainment in public premises.
Billiards Licences: There are two places licensed for
billiards: the Queen`s Hall, Tontine Street, and 24, Rendezvous Street.
Supervision of these premises has been kept, and no adverse reports have been
received.
Conclusion: I should like to express my appreciation
for the uniform kindness and fairness extended to me by the Bench during the past
year, and for the valuable assistance and advice of your Clerk, Mr. John
Andrew, which at all times is placed unreservedly at my service, and has been
especially so during the year under review.
Col. Owen said he wished on behalf of the Bench that
all licences were renewed. The Magistrates considered they had a remarkable
record on the number of cases of drunkenness that had been before the Bench for
disposal. The number of cases of drunkenness that had been before the Bench
was, they thought, very remarkably small. It had been pointed out to them
taking 25 years ago instead of 21 cases for drunkenness which had been brought
before them, there were 171. He thought they might say in view of that that the
town had progressed in sobriety enormously. They were all aware that the beer
was far cheaper years ago.
The Clerk: And better.
The Adjourned Licensing Sessions were fixed for the 6th
March.
Occasional Licences
The Chairman said the Bench had had under consideration
the question of the issue of licences on special occasions, and the view of the
Bench was that on the granting of occasional licences that outsiders should be
excluded from 10 p.m. and only those should be admitted who were bona fide
attending the function for which the licence was granted. It was a matter of
great importance.
Folkestone
Herald 15-2-1930
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 12th: Before Colonel
G.P. Owen, Mr. G.I. Swoffer, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Mr. W. Griffin, Alderman T.S.
Franks, Engineer Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, Mr. R.J. Stokes, Miss A.M. Hunt,
Mrs. E. Gore and Mr. F. Seager.
A very satisfactory report was presented by the Chief
Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) to the Licensing Magistrates at the Annual
Licensing Session for Folkestone, held at the Town Hall on Wednesday. During
the year there had been very few cases of drunkenness and figures submitted
showed that Folkestone had a fine record of sobriety.
All licences were renewed.
The Chief Constable presented his report (for details
see Folkestone Express).
The Chairman, announcing that all the licences would be
renewed, said he would like to refer to the town`s splendid record in regard to
drunkenness. The number of cases during the year showed a remarkably small
percentage. It had been pointed out to him that whereas there were only 21
cases of drunkenness last year the number of cases before the Court 25 years
ago was 171. He thought they might say that the town had progressed in sobriety
enormously. “We are all aware, too” added the Chairman “that in those days beer
was far cheaper”.
The Clerk (Mr. J. Andrew): And better. (Laughter)
The Chairman said the town could be congratulated on
its excellent record.
The Chairman said the Bench had had under consideration
the question of the issue of licences for special occasions, and it was the
view of the Bench that when occasional licences were granted outsiders should
be excluded after 10 o`clock; only those attending in a bona fide capacity the
function for which the licence was granted to be present. It was a matter of
great importance.
The adjourned licensing sessions were fixed for March
12th.
Folkestone
Express 14-2-1931
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 11th: Before Alderman
R.G. Wood, The Mayor, Colonel G.P. Owen, Alderman A.E. Pepper, Mr. J.H. Blamey,
Miss Hunt, Mr. W. Griffin, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Alderman G. Spurgen, Alderman T.S.
Franks, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. W. Smith, and Mr. F. Seager.
The Chief Constable presented his annual report as
follows:- I have the honour to present my eighth annual report relating to the
administration of the licensing laws within the Borough for the year ending 31st
December, 1930.
Licensed Premises: There are in the Borough 115
premises licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor, the number being made up
as follows: Full licences 69; beer on 7; beer off 11; beer and spirit dealers
9; grocers, etc., off 6; confectioners wine off 4; cider and sweets off 2;
chemists wine off 7; total 115; 80 on, 35 off. No licensed premises were
referred back on the grounds of redundancy by the annual Licensing Committee.
Alehouse Licences: Of the alehouse licences one is a
six days` licence.
Licences Transferred: The following licences were
transferred during the year: Red Cow Inn, from Arthur M. McIlveen to Henry W.
Cork; George III P.H., Henry William Cork, William H. Best; Lifeboat Inn, H.
Rolfe, Percy Stringer; Chequers Inn, Walter Scrivens, Florence Kent; Chequers
Inn, Florence Kent, R. Williams; Alexandra Tavern, John Marsh, Richard Marsh;
Alexandra Hotel, John E. Fortune, Stanley Bishop; Imperial Hotel, Robert
Puncheon, David C. Harlow; Royal George Hotel, George Dowson, William R.
Oberman.
Alterations to Licensed Premises: Structural
alterations have been sanctioned by the Bench during the year in connection
with the Gun Tavern, the Bouverie Hotel, and the Railway Hotel, Coolinge Lane.
Occasional Licences: Forty three occasional licences
were granted to licence holders to sell intoxicating liquor other than on their
own licensed premises.
Extension of Licensing Hours: Three hundred and fifty
three extensions have been granted to licence holders when dinners, etc., were
being held on their licensed premises, and in no case has any abuse of the
privilege been recorded.
Proceedings against Licence Holders: During the year no
licence holders have been proceeded against for committing a breach of the
Intoxicating Liquor Laws.
Visits by Police to Licensed Premises: All licensed
premises have been periodically visited at irregular intervals by my officers
during the year to see that they are being conducted in a satisfactory manner,
and no adverse reports have been submitted to me. The total number of visits
was 2,218.
Drunkenness: During the year ended 31st
December, 1930, 26 persons (18 males and eight females) were proceeded against
in the Borough Court for drunkenness. These were dealt with as follows: Six
males and two females were convicted, and twelve males and six females were
discharged after being cautioned by the Bench. Of those proceeded against, ten
were residents of the Borough, ten non-residents, and six of no fixed abode.
This number is an increase of five as compared with 1929, when eight were
convicted and thirteen discharged.
Comparative Return of Drunkenness: The following table
shows a comparative return for drunkenness with towns similarly situated to
Folkestone. Folkestone, number proceeded against per 1,000 population, .69;
Chester, 1.29; Margate, .84; Canterbury, .67; Scarborough, .36; Hastings, 1.08;
Cambridge, .47; Gravesend, 3.4; Hove, .399, Ramsgate, .38.
Permitted Hours: The permitted hours as allowed by the
Licensing Act of 1921, have been fixed by the Licensing Justices for this
Borough as under: Weekdays, from 10.30 a.m. to 2.30 p.m., and from 6 p.m. to 10
p.m. Sundays from 12 noon to 2 p.m. and from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. During the
months of June, July, August and September, 1930, the extension of half an hour
on weekdays, from 10 p.m. to 10.30 p.m., was again allowed by the Bench, and I
am pleased to state that no ill-effects have been observed.
Clubs: Seventeen clubs where intoxicating liquor is
supplied are registered under the Act. This is a decrease of two as compared
with the preceding year. Mary`s Bridge and Social Club, Cheriton Road, ceased
to function as a club on the 31st March, 1930, and the Folkestone
Working Men`s Club and Institute, 49b, Tontine Street, went into liquidation
and was closed on 28th June, 1930. One club was entered under a
Justices` warrant on the 6th June, 1930, for suspected breaches of
the licensing laws. This resulted in proceedings being taken against ten
persons; three for supplying and seven for consuming intoxicating liquor during
non-permitted hours. Of this number, eight were convicted and two were
dismissed by the justices. The Secretary of the club was also summoned to show
cause why the club should not be struck off the register of clubs. The Justices
placed the club on probation for a period of three months, the police to have
right of entry at any time. Daily visits were made at irregular times, and the
premises were found to be conducted in a satisfactory manner. The summons
against the Secretary was therefore dismissed at the end of the probation
period.
Hotels: Six hotels and two restaurants have authority
under Section III of the Licensing Act, 1921, to supply intoxicating liquor
with meals for one hour after 10 p.m. on weekdays, namely: Metropole Hotel,
Grand Hotel, Majestic Hotel, Regina Hotel, Esplanade Hotel, Royal Pavilion
Hotel, Central Cafe and Savoy Cafe.
Music and Dancing: Forty four licences for music and
dancing have been granted or renewed under the provisions of Part IV of the
Pblic Health (Amendment) Act, 1890. Of this number 13 are for the use of
wireless for public entertainment in licensed premises.
Billiards Licences: There are two places licensed for
billiards, namely, The Queen`s Hall, Tontine Street, and 24, Rendezvous Street.
Supervision of these premises has been kept and no adverse reports have been
received.
Conclusion: I should like to express my sincere
appreciation for the uniform kindness and fairness extended to me by the Bench
during the past year, and for the valuable assistance and advice of your Clerk,
Mr. Charles Rootes, which have on all occasions been unreservedly placed at my
service, since, and prior to taking uphis present appointment.
The Chairman said the Magistrates were obliged to the
Chief Constable for that admirable report. The Magistrates had instructed him
to say that the report was of a very satisfactory nature. They noted that the
proceedings against persons for drunkenness were in excess of last year. They
would have preferred that the number had been five less instead of five more. They
realised that only ten residents had been proceeded against for drunkenness.
That must be deemed to be satisfactory, particularly having regard to the fact
that they were a pleasure resort, and they had a great many thousands of people
there for a holiday. The wave of sobriety over Folkestone during that year, and
for some years past, was not confined to that town, but to many places.
Regarding the report in all its aspects it was the most satisfactory they had
had for the following reasons:- in the first instance they knew that the Chief
Constable and his officers had been functioning during the year and had been
very careful that the licensing laws should be carried out. They considered
that by the number of visits which had been made to licensed premises it was
satisfactory that no proceedings had been taken against any licence holder, and
that the extensions of licences which had been granted – some of them might say
too frequently – had not been abused. Representations had been made to the
Magistrates for some years for an extension of hours during the summer months
and finally it was granted, therefore they were very pleased to know that no
ill-effects had been observed according to the Chief Constable. The Magistrates
had decided that they had no intention at present of referring any licence to
the compensation authority, and all the licences would be renewed that day with
the same hours and conditions as applied during the past year.
The Chairman announced that the Adjourned Licensing
Sessions would be held on March 11th.
Folkestone
Herald 14-2-1931
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 11th: Before Alderman
R.G. Wood, The Mayor, Colonel G.P. Owen, Alderman A.E. Pepper, Alderman G.
Spurgen, Mr. W. Griffin, Dr. W.W. Nuttall,
Mr. J.H. Blamey, Miss A.M. Hunt, Alderman A. Castle, Mrs. E. Gore,
Alderman T.S. Franks, Mr. W. Smith, and Mr. F. Seager.
The Chief Constable submitted his annual report (for
details see Folkestone Express).
The Chairman said the Licensing Magistrates had had an
opportunity of seeing the report and they had instructed him to say that they
thought it was of a very satisfactory nature. They noted that proceedings against
persons for drunkenness during the past year were five in excess of the
previous year. They would rather it had been five less, but at the same time
they realised that when only ten residents had been proceeded against the
report must be regarded as very satisfactory for a town of close on 40,000
people. They also had to remember that they were a holiday resort and during
the summer had thousands of visitors amongst them. The sobriety which had been
enjoyed by Folkestone for some years now was not particular to their own town,
for it was spreading throughout the country. Perhaps it was the most
satisfactory they had ever had, because they knew that the Chief Constable and
his officers during the past year had been very vigilant in seeing that the law
was carried out. They were told that by the number of visits made. It was also
very satisfactory to know that no proceedings had been taken against licence
holders, and that the extension of the licensing hours on various occasions had
not been abused. They regarded that as very satisfactory. The Magistrates had
decided not to refer any licences back for extinction, and all the licences
granted last year would be renewed on the same conditions as before.
When two applications were received for permission to
give radio concerts in two public houses it was announced that at the adjourned
sessions the Bench would favourably consider an extension of the existing hours
from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Folkestone
Express 26-3-1932
Local News
Yesterday (Thursday) the Folkestone Magistrates granted
an application made on behalf of the members of the Licensed Victuallers`
Association for an extension of one hour of their licences on Thursday,
Saturday and Monday evenings during the Easter holidays.
The Magistrates on the Bench were: The Mayor, Alderman
R.G. Wood, Alderman A.E. Pepper, Col. G.P. Owen, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Mr. W.
Griffin, Alderman T.S. Franks, Mr. W. Smith, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. S. Seager, and
Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, who made the application, said he
appeared on behalf of 59 licensees in the town, some of whom were members of the
Licensed Victuallers` Association. Every one of those licensees asked the
Magistrates to grant similar facilities which had been granted for the Easter
holiday in other towns, namely an additional hour until eleven o`clock on
Thursday, Saturday and Monday evenings. The application was made under Section
57 of the Licensing Consolidation Act, and it had been held that Christmas time
and holiday times were special occasions under the Act. A number of Benches had
now considered such facilities should be granted especially in those times when
they had been urged to spend their holidays at home. Such Benches as
Eastbourne, who did not grant the extra half hour in the summer months, had
granted that extension on those particular three days. The application had come
very late in the day for Folkestone to be advertised as one of the towns
granting the concession but they had a visit of a big delegation of teachers
staying there during the holidays. He was not suggesting that teachers were
abnormal people, but they would be about their duties and visiting places of
entertainment, and he asked the Magistrates to say it was a perfectly
reasonable thing that after visiting cinemas and other places of entertainments
which closed at half past ten, it was a perfectly reasonable thing before
proceeding to their homes they should be able to have refreshments if they
cared to do so. It was not merely for private gain that that application was
made, but it was made in the sincere belief that it was in the interests of
Folkestone, and that it was in the interests of the country in order to induce
people to spend their holidays at home that such reasonable facilities should
be granted. His application was merely to extend the hour of closing from 10
p.m. to 11 p.m. on the three days he had mentioned.
The Clerk (Mr. C. Rootes): What about the clubs?
Mr. Bonniface: There are no clubs concerned in the
application.
The Chief Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) said eleven
licensees were not making the application that morning.
Mr. Bonniface: Some of those are large hotels and they
have already been granted facilities.
The Magistrates` Clerk to the Chief Constable: What do
you say about the application?
The Chief Constable said it was a concession for which
application had never been made previously. It was difficult to say in which
direction it would work. One could not say if such a concession would be to the
ultimate good of Folkestone and the visitors as a whole. There would be a
certain amount of work placed on the Police if the application was granted. If
the concession was abused in any way he would have something to say in the
future. At the moment he had no objection to it at all.
The Mayor said the Bench granted the application.
Folkestone
Express 17-12-1932
Local News
On Monday at the Folkestone Police Court the
Magistrates heard applications for extensions of licences at the hotels and
Corporation places of entertainment, and they granted the requests so far as
licences to sell intoxicating drink was concerned. There will be one hour`s
extension on Christmas Eve, Boxing Day, and New Years`s Eve at practically all
the licensed houses.
The Magistrates on the Bench were Alderman R.G. Wood,
Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Miss A.M. Hunt, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. W. Smith, Mr. J.H. Blamey
and Mr. F. Seager.
The Magistrates` Clerk (Mr. C. Rootes) said the
Magistrates had a list of the applications so far as he knew them before them.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, who appeared on behalf of the
Folkestone Licensed Victuallers` Association, said the authorities had been
notified of numerous applications.
Mr. Bonniface then applied on behalf of practically all
the members of the Folkestone Licensed victuallers` Association for extensions
on three nights during the holiday season. He said he was representing the
whole of the licensed victuallers with the exception of six licensees, who
would possibly make an application to the Magistrates later. He asked that they
should be granted extensions of one hour from 10 to 11 p.m. on December 24th,
26th and 31st. It would be useless for him to point out
to the Magistrates what other seaside resorts had done as the decisions there
had appeared in the press. It really did not want any words of his to put
forward the application. In Windsor they had granted a full day`s licence from
10 a.m. to 11 p.m., but the licensees were not asking them for such a
concession. The Magistrates had granted similar applications at Easter and
Whitsuntide, and he thought he was quite correct when he said there was not a
single case of drunkenness brought before the Bench at that time.
The Chairman asked if Chief Inspector Pittock had
anything to say as to whether there was anything amiss at Easter and Whitsun in
consequence of the extension of the licences.
Chief Inspector Pittock: Nothing at all. There is no
objection to the application being granted.
The Magistrates` Clerk: The Chief Constable, before he
left the Court, intimated to me that he had no objection to the extensions.
The Chairman said the Magistrates granted the
application in respect of the three nights mentioned for an extension of hours
to 11 p.m. That applied, however, to those names mentioned on the list. Unless
the others applied they would not have the extension.
Folkestone
Herald 17-12-1932
Local News
The Folkestone Magistrates on Monday, at a special
sitting, extended the licensing hours of a number of local hotels to 1 a.m. in
connection with the New Year`s Eve celebrations.
The licences of Folkestone public houses, with the
exception of six, were also extended on Christmas Eve, Boxing Day, and New
Year`s Eve from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m.
The Magistrates were: Alderman R.G. Wood, Mr. J.H.
Blamey, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Miss A.M. Hunt, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. F. Seager, Eng.
Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, and Mr. W. Smith.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, on behalf of all the local Licensed
Victuallers except six, applied for the extension of the licences of public
houses and certain hotels with separate bars on Christmas Eve from 10 p.m. to
11 p.m., and similar extensions for Boxing Day and New Year`s Eve. Mr.
Bonniface said it would be useless to point out what so many seaside places had
done because the Magistrates read their newspapers, and therefore it did not
need many words from him to ask the Magistrates to grant the applications. They
would have noticed that at Windsor the facilities had been extended so that on
two days the licensed houses were open all day from 10 a.m. to 11 p.m. He was
not asking for that. All he asked for was an extension of one hour on these
three days. The licensees assured him that when similar applications had been
granted at Easter and Whitsun there had not been a single case of drunkenness.
In reply to the Bench, Chief Inspector H.G. Pittock
said there had been nothing amiss when the hours had been lengthened before,
and the police had no objection.
The Chairman said the application would be granted, but
the six licensees who were not represented must understand that they could not
open unless they made an application. They must not think that the extension
applied to them.
Folkestone
Express 11-2-1933
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 8th: Before Alderman R.G.
Wood, The Mayor, Alderman A.E. Pepper, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Miss
A.M. Hunt, Alderman T.S. Franks, Mr. W. Smith, Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens,
Mr. W. Hollands, and Mr. S.B. Corser.
The Chief Constable presented his report as follows:- I
have the honour to present my tenth annual report relating to the
administration of the licensing laws within the borough for the year ending 31st
December, 1932.
Licensed Premises: There are in the borough 114
premises licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor, the number being made up
as follows: Full licences, 68; beer on, 7; beer off, 10; beer and spirit
dealers, 9; grocers, etc., off, 6; confectioners wine on, 5; cider and sweets,
off, 2; chemists wine off, 7; Total 114. (80 on and 34 off). This shows a
reduction of one full licence as compared with the preceding year, being
brought about by the closing of the Granville, Dover Street, on the 31st
December, 1932, on the grounds of redundancy. In addition to the above, the
Oddfellows was considered by the Licensing Justices at the general annual
licensing meeting, but the licence of this house was renewed at the adjourned
annual licensing meeting on the 9th March, 1932.
Alehouse Licences: Of the alehouse licences, one is a
six days` licence.
Occasional Licences: Forty two occasional licences were
granted to licence holders to sell intoxicating liquor other than on their own
licensed premises.
Extension of Licensing Hours: Five hundred and four
extensions have been granted to licence holders when dinners, etc., were being
held on their licensed premises, and in no case has any abuse of the privilege
been recorded.
Alterations to Licensed Premises: Structural
alterations were sanctioned by the Bench on the 13th April, 1932, in
respect of the Royal George Hotel, Beach Street.
Licences Transferred: The following licences were
transferred during the year: Honest Lawyer, Charlotte Hubbard to Ernest A.
Baker (sic); Bradstone Tavern, Harry Obed Older to Harry J. Rhodes; George III,
William H.A. Best to George C. Prior; Lifeboat Inn, Percival L. Stringer to
Harry S. Jordan; Harvey Inn, Harold J. Sherrin to Frederick J. Grew; Honest
Lawyer, Charlotte Hubbard to Ernest E. Jeffrey.
Proceedings Against licence Holders: During the year no
licence holders have been proceeded against for any breach of the Intoxicating
Liquor Laws, but two were cautioned by me; one for not entering in a day book
the delivery of six bottles of ale, also not entering the same in the delivery
book; and the other licensee for selling intoxicating liquor at 10.56 p.m., the
explanation in this case being that the licensee was under the impression that
an extension had been granted in respect of the premises.
Visits by Police to Licensed Premises: All licensed
premises have been periodically visited at irregular intervals by my officers
to see that they are being conducted in a satisfactory manner, and no adverse
reports have been submitted to me. The total number of visits was 1,910.
Drunkenness: During the year 15 persons (13 males and
two females) were proceeded against in the Borough Court for drunkenness. These
were dealt with as follows: Convicted, ten males and one female. Discharged,
three males and one female. The persons proceeded against were: Residents of
Folkestone, three males and one female; Non-residents, four males and one
female; No fixed abode, five males; Soldiers, one. The total proceedings for
drunkenness shows a decrease of eleven as compared with the preceding year,
when 16 persons were convicted and ten discharged.
Comparative Return of Drunkenness: The following table
shows a comparative return for drunkenness with towns similarly situated to
Folkestone: Folkestone, 35,890 population and .417 percent proceeded against
per 1,000 population; Canterbury, 24,450 and .65 percent; Hastings, 65,199 and
1.01 percent; Gravesend, 35,490 and .8 percent; Chester, 41,438 and .748
percent; Newcastle under Lyme, 54,699 and .42 percent; Margate, 31,312 and .7
percent; Scarborough, 41,791 and .24 percent; Hove, 54,994 and .509 percent. It
will be seen that Folkestone`s record for sobriety stands higher than ever.
Permitted Hours: The permitted hours as allowed by the
Licensing Act of 1921 have been fixed by the Licensing Justices for this
Borough as under: Weekdays from 10.30 a.m. to 2.30 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 10
p.m.; Sundays from 12 noon to 2 p.m. and from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. During the
months of June, July, August and September, 1932, an extension of half an hour
on weekdays, from 10 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. was again allowed by the Bench, and I
am pleased to state that no ill-effects have been observed.
Clubs: Nineteen clubs where intoxicating liquor is
supplied are registered under the Act, this being an increase of two as
compared with the preceding year. The new clubs are: The Associated Motor
Owners` Society Club, 10, Cheriton Gardens, which was registered as a club on
the 27th June, 1932, and the Folkestone Pool and Tote Club, Ltd., 57
– 59, Sandgate Road, which was registered on the 13th December,
1932. This has now changed its name to the Folkestone Sporting Club.
Hotels: six hotels and two restaurants have authority
under Section III of the Licensing Act, 1921, to supply intoxicating liquor
with meals for one hour after 10 p.m. an weekdays, namely: Metropole Hotel,
Grand Hotel, Majestic Hotel, Regina Hotel, Esplanade Hotel, Royal Pavilion
Hotel, Central Cafe and Savoy Cafe.
Music and Dancing: Forty seven licences for music and
dancing have been granted or renewed under the provisions of Part IV of the
Public Health (Amendment) Act, 1890. This is a decrease of one as compared with
the preceding year. Of this number, 13 are for the use of wireless for public
entertainment in licensed premises.
Billiards Licences: There are three premises licensed
for billiards in the borough, namely: The Queen`s Hall, Tontine Street, 24,
Rendezvous Street, and the Fishermen`s Institute, The Stade. Supervision of
these premises has been kept, and no adverse reports have been received.
Conclusion: In conclusion I should like to express my
appreciation of the happy relations existing between the Police and the Bench
during the past year, and for the valuable assistance and advice of your Clerk,
Mr. Charles Rootes, which is always unreservedly placed at my services.
The Chairman said on behalf of the Licensing Justices
he thanked the Chief Constable for his very clear report. They had had a chance
of reading it through and he was instructed to say the Justices considered it
exceedingly good and very satisfactory. There was no doubt there were many contributory
factors which he was not going to touch upon at that point, with the exception
of one, and that was the fact that no proceedings had been taken against any
licence holder. They had cause to think that the licence holders were one of
the contributing factors by the way they conducted their houses. In the happy
state of things that they found in that report there were many points that it
was not necessary for him to deal with. The extension of licensed hours did not
apply to all licence holders but only to a few in comparison. Those licence
holders would know that the Folkestone Bench was rather liberal in granting
extensions when they were applied for. They had a reason for that, but it was
principally because it was a seaside place. They had many visitors and it would
be rather hard lines if visitors who came down for the weekend or for a holiday
were not allowed some extension. What gratified them was that in no case had an
abuse of the privilege been recorded. So long as that happy state of things existed
he did not think they need fear any different treatment from the Licensing
Justices. The next point was the very happy decrease in the number of cases of
drunkenness, eleven cases less than in the preceding year. They had a
population of 35,000, and that was increased during holiday times very largely.
He thought some of the credit was due to the holidaymakers. He supposed, after
all, they came down for a good time, and he hoped they got it. However, only
three of those 15 cases were residents of the borough. That was wholly
satisfactory, and he thought it was a record.
The Chief Constable: I think it is really.
The Chairman said so far as his memory went it was a
record. In the eleven towns mentioned in the report and which were about the
same size as Folkestone, they came second. That was exceedingly good. The
extension for the half hour during the summer months for which the licence
holders asked and which they eventually granted had been satisfactory and
helpful to the licence holders and it had been appreciated by their visitors
who flocked there in the summer. The Chief Constable stated he was pleased to
say no ill-effects had been observed. He did not think there was any need to
comment further on the matter, with the exception of the concluding paragraph,
in which the Chief Constable referred to the happy relationship between the
Bench and Police. He could endorse that and he thought those happy
relationships were very desirable for the Police and for the Bench to work
together with the assistance of their worthy Clerk, and that co-operation no
doubt made a big contribution towards the good government of the borough. He
congratulated the Chief Constable on that excellent report.
The Chairman announced that the whole of the on and off
licences were renewed. The music and dancing licences and the billiard licences
were also again granted.
The adjourned sessions were fixed for Wednesday, March
8th.
Folkestone
Herald 11-2-1933
Annual Licensing Sessions
“The Folkestone Bench is rather liberal in granting
extensions when they are applied for. We have a reason for that, but what
gratifies us is that in no case has any abuse of the privilege been recorded.
So long as that happy state of things exists, I do not think you have any fear
of different treatment from the Licensing Justices”.
Alderman R.G. Wood, Chairman of the Folkestone
Licensing Magistrates, made this observation when commenting upon Folkestone`s
good record for sobriety during the past year, at the annual Licensing
Sessions, which were held at the Town Hall on Wednesday.
The report submitted by the Chief Constable (Mr. A.S.
Beesley) showed that during the past year only three residents had been charged
with drunkenness, as compared with six during the previous year, whilst no
proceedings had been taken against any licensee.
The Magistrates were: Alderman R.G. Wood, The Mayor,
Alderman T.S. Franks, Alderman A.E. Pepper, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Miss A.M. Hunt, Mr.
W. Smith, Councillor W. Hollands, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Engineer Rear Admiral L.J.
Stephens, and Mr. S.B. Corser.
The Chief Constable submitted his report (for details
see Folkestone Express).
Alderman Wood, on behalf of the Magistrates, thanked
the Chief Constable for his very clear report. He said that the Magistrates had
had a chance of reading it through and he was instructed to say the Licensing
Magistrates considered that report exceedingly good and very satisfactory.
“There was no doubt that there are many contributing factors which I am not
going to touch upon, with the exception of one: That is the fact that no
proceedings had been taken against licence holders”, continued Alderman Wood.
“We think that goes to prove the licence holders are one of the contributing
factors, by the way they conducted their houses, to this very happy state of
things which we find in this report of the Chief Constable”. Proceeding,
Alderman Wood said there were several points in the report upon which he would
like to comment. One was with regard to the extension of licensing hours. This did
not apply to all licence holders, but only to a few in comparison. “Those
licence holders well know that the Folkestone Bench is rather liberal in
granting extensions when they are applied for”, said Alderman Wood. “We have a
reason for that, perhaps, because we have many visitors here, and the hotels
and pavilions run dances, and so on. It would be rather hard lines if visitors
coming down for weekends or holidays were not given some extension during that
period. But what gratifies us is that in no case has any abuse of the privilege
been recorded. So long as that happy state of things exists, I do not think you
have any fear of different treatment from the Licensing Justices. The next point
is the happy decrease in drunkenness. There had been 11 cases fewer than in the
preceding year – 15 cases during the 12 months. We have a population of 35,000,
and that population is increased in the holiday times and during the season
very largely, therefore I think some of this credit is due to the holidaymakers
who come down. Now I have one for the residents. Only three of those 15 are
residents of the borough. That is exceedingly satisfactory. I do not know
whether it is a record or not, Chief?”
The Chief Constable: I think it is really.
Alderman Wood: It is a record as far as I can remember.
There are 11 towns down here, about the same size as Folkestone, and we came
second. Continuing, Alderman Wood said the extensions of half an hour during
the summer months, which they had asked for and which the Magistrates
eventually granted, had been appreciated. They were appreciated by licence
holders, he knew, and they had been appreciated by the visitors who flocked
into the town, and he was pleased that the Chief Constable had said that no
ill-effects had been observed. Referring to the concluding paragraph of the
Chief Constable`s report, Alderman Wood endorsed the remarks about the happy
relations existing between the Bench and the police. It was desirable for the
Police and for the Bench to work together with the assistance of their worthy
Clerk. That co-operation no doubt made a big contribution towards the good
government of the borough.
He then announced that the whole of the licences would
be renewed for the ensuing year.
Folkestone
Herald 18-2-1933
Editorial
The Folkestone Licensing Magistrates, sitting at the
annual Brewster Sessions last week, congratulated the licensees of the area
upon the highly satisfactory report of the sobriety of the Borough which the
Chief Constable had placed before them. The decreased drunkenness – 15 persons
as against 26 in the preceding year – coupled with the complete absence of any
proceedings against licence holders during the year, reflects indeed great credit
upon those who are responsible for the conduct of licensed premises in
Folkestone. The same happy condition obtains in Hythe, New Romney and Lydd, and
it is obvious that the steady decrease in drunkenness, which has been such a
marked feature of the figures placed before Licensing Magistrates since the
War, cannot be brought to a much lower level. However excellent may be the
social work, however difficult it may be to obtain intoxicating liquor, there
will, unfortunately, always be amongst us those who, for one reason or another,
drink to excess. Most of them, perhaps, are more medical than social problems.
The licensee of today, however, is a valued citizen, in that he himself helps
to preserve in the town that sobriety which is so eminently desirable. This
may, perhaps, in some measure, be due to the great licensing reforms which have
taken place during this century. The licence holder today finds himself not
only hedged around by laws, regulations, and restrictions, but he has had
during the past year to endure the effects of a very heavy tax upon his
principal commodity – beer. The active vigilance of the police, the careful
surveillance of the brewers, and the rigorous prosecution of offenders against
the licensing laws, have made the licensee indeed a man of great caution. How
cautious he has to be is seen by the fact that even a humble game of darts in a
public house on a Sunday evening is not viewed with favour by the Magistrates
of New Romney and Lydd. The beer tax, against which every Trade organisation
has protested, is a very heavy burden upon a trade which already contributed an
enormous sum of money annually to the National Exchequer by way of taxation.
Whether the Chancellor, in his next Budget, will see his way clear to a
lessening of the burden of the beer tax remains to be seen. If he is able to do
so, he will earn the gratitude of a large section of the populace. Whether the
high price of beer has anything to do with the decrease in convictions for
drunkenness during the past year is a moot point, and does not, in our opinion,
in any way decrease the credit which is due to the licensees for the manner in
which they have conducted their houses. We trust that the Chief Constable will
be able to present to the Licensing Magistrates next February as satisfactory a
report as that which he was able to present last week.
Folkestone
Express 15-7-1933
Tuesday, July 11th: Before Dr. W.W. Nuttall,
Alderman T.S. Franks, Miss A.M. Hunt, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. W. Smith and Councillor
Hollands.
Reference was made to an application for an application
for an extension of hours in connection with certain licensed houses.
The Clerk (Mr. C. Rootes) said the application was for
an extension from 2.30 to five o`clock on Friday and Saturday. It was rather an
unusual one, and there were altogether 22 licensees making the application.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface said he was appearing for the
applicants. The application was for two days when there was a visit to the town
of at least 1,200 French excursionists. Three boats were arriving on Friday,
and one party was staying two days. Certain licensees in the district in which
they would probably be had been requested to apply.
The Chairman: Does that mean there will be no closing
in the afternoon at all on that day?
Mr. Bonniface: Only from five to six.
The Chairman said the question would be considered the
next day at the full licensing meeting.
Wednesday, July 12th: Before Alderman R.G.
Wood, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Miss A.M. Hunt, Alderman T.S. Franks, Mrs.
E. Gore, Mr. W. Smith, Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, and Councillor W.
Hollands.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface said he appeared on behalf of 24
licensees in the town to ask the Magistrates that on Friday and Saturday they
would grant them what was commonly known as an extension, but which was really
a special order of exemption from closing from the hour of 2.30 until 5 in the
afternoon. The Magistrates were authorised to do that under Section 57 of the
Licensing Consolidation Acts, under which they could treat that as a special
occasion. They therefore would not be bound by the recent appeal, as it was
really such an occasion On Friday there would arrive at the Harbour at least
four special passenger boats. There might be more, but there would be four
definitely. The first of those boats arrived at an early hour, and there would
be at least one thousand passengers, who would be drawn from six of the large
towns in the north of France. With that party they were not concerned. They would
arrive at the Harbour, but they would be conveyed to London, where they would
stay for the day and return in the evening going straight on the boat. That
would be followed by another boat with about 1,200 passengers, all of whom
would remain the whole of the day in Folkestone. They would arrive fairly early
in the morning and would not be leaving until the evening. Another boat would
arrive from Dunquerke, and that would bring about 600 passengers, who would
arrive at 12.30 midday and would leave again at six o`clock. So the Magistrates
would see they would merely be there for the afternoon. For the fourth boat
there were definitely over a thousand bookings, and those people were two-day
tourists. They would go direct to London for the first day, but would return to
Folkestone on Saturday morning and remain in the town for the whole day,
returning to France in the evening. Under those circumstances he asked the
Magistrates to grant the application, bearing in mind there were different
habits on the Continent to what there were in England, and also that the French
people, when at home and on holiday, adopted their usual practice to have a
drink with their lunch and to stay on during the afternoon. That was the time
the French people devoted to their conversation and drinks. The organisers had
in view the idea of keeping those people in Folkestone, and were in fact making
arrangements for them in the evening to visit the local cinemas. They were
making arrangements so that at least 1,200 French people would be in Folkestone
all day on Friday, and anything up to a thousand all day on Saturday. The
licensees in the past when those French trips had visited Folkestone had
experienced considerable difficulty in explaining to their visitors that the
country`s licensing laws did not permit them to serve anyone with drink during
the afternoon. The French people could not understand why they could not enjoy
the facilities they had on the other side. Folkestone, by reason of those
trips, was very considerably advertised on the Continent. On previous
occasions, what the organisers had had to do in the afternoon was to take those
visitors of theirs out of the town on a trip to Canterbury, in order to keep
them occupied in some way during the afternoon. Naturally the licensed
victuallers, and all of them, were anxious that when those visitors were in the
town, what money they had to spend should be spent in the town. He was asking
the Bench to say that on these two occasions when those visitors were with
them, they would treat that as a special occasion and grant them the facilities
which it was in their power to do. He thought he was right in saying that
during any previous trips over there during the licensing hours there had never
been any complaint of the conduct of those visitors, and he suggested to the
Bench that they could not and would not anticipate anything but orderly
behaviour. The organisers themselves sent with each party four gendarmes, who
were responsible if anything occurred, for seeing that the people were put back
on the boats. Fortunately, they had never had anything of that kind on any of
those trips. On the list of licences they would see that that was not a general
application by the licensees of the borough. That was an application by the
licensees who would be affected. They would find amongst them hotels where
visitors would, in a number of cases, be lunching. They would find, perhaps,
one which needed a little explanation, because it was rather off the main
route, which was the Harbour, High Street, and Sandgate Road. The Black Bull
had, as he was instructed, definitely booked forty of these people for lunch on
Friday.
The Chairman said he did not agree that a Frenchman was
going to sit in a public house or hotel during the afternoon. It was the only afternoon
he was going to have, and he was going to make the most of his time out of
doors.
Mr. Bonniface said he did not suggest that a Frenchman
would sit there all the afternoon, but he suggested that his habit was such
that if he drank at all, he drank in the afternoon, and when he was going round
he wanted to know why he could not drink as he usually did in the afternoon.
The Chairman: You are aware that a battleship is in at
the same time, and we shall be full of visitors on Saturday afternoon, and what
you are asking for the French excursionists will be at the option of other
visitors too.
Mr. Bonniface said he thought they would agree that
when they had had a battleship in they had never had a complaint.
The Chairman: But you have not had them open all the
afternoon.
Mr. Bonniface: I do not think you will suggest that it
makes any difference.
Chief Inspector Pittock, in reply to the Bench, said he
had not got anything to say, except that on Saturday they had a large number of
charabanc trippers from London, and it was quite a common thing to see that
they had had sufficient to drink in the ordinary way. If they were able to get
in the public houses to get more, he did not think what the position would be
quite. It was only fair to point that out.
The Magistrates retired to consider the application.
The Chairman, when they returned, said the Bench had
fully considered the application which had been made on behalf of twenty four
licensees in the borough. As they knew, when a licensee made an application for
an occasional licence, he usually got it. Full consideration had been given on
the point Mr. Bonniface emphasised on the French visitors. They, like the other
people of Folkestone, were always prepared to welcome French visitors, and they
did not like to do anything to discourage them in any way, but they could not
consider that and that alone. Everything else verging on those two days had to
have full consideration, and taking it on a broad basis like that, they felt
they could not grant the application.
Folkestone
Express 9-12-1933
Local News
Applications for the extension of hours for the sale of
intoxicating liquor during the Christmas holidays and for New Year`s Eve were
dealt with by the Folkestone Magistrates on Friday, when the members of the
Bench present included Alderman R.G. Wood, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Alderman T.S.
Franks, Mrs. E. Gore, Mr. W. Smith, Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, and Alderman
J.W. Stainer.
The first application was made by 59 licensees in the
borough, who asked for one hour`s extension from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. on
Saturday, December 23rd, Boxing Day (26th December), and
Saturday, 30th December.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, on behalf of the applicants, said
that the 23rd December was practically taking the place of Christmas
Eve, as Christmas Eve fell on Sunday that year. He would point out to the Bench
that that was the day when the visitors would be coming, when relatives would
be coming home, and when their own people would be shopping up to quite a late
hour on that particular day, as they would not be able to shop on the following
day. He would also suggest that in asking for that one hour he was not asking
for anything exceptional, because he observed from the morning paper that in
the Royal Borough of Windsor on that day there was opening all day, and also on
the 26th, so that he thought the application by the Folkestone
licensees was a reasonable one. He suggested that they, in that town, were,
within reasonable limits, prepared to make their town as bright as possible for
their visitors. With regard to the 30th, that, of course, was New
Year`s Eve in effect, and he suggested that the same remarks applied to that.
The Chairman: I can follow you about the 23rd
and the 26th all right, but is there any real occasion for the 30th?
The Christmas visitors are gone, most of them.
Mr. Bonniface said that might be so, but they had to
consider the town itself, and the fact that it was New year`s Eve.
The Chairman: It is an innovation.
Mr. Bonniface: We have never asked for it before, sir,
but it is not an unusual thing for me to ask, because other licensees have
asked for it of other Benches.
The Chairman, referring to the remaining six licences
mentioned, said that, of course, any extension would not apply to them unless
they applied to the Bench.
Mr. Bonniface said he understood one of them was making
an application.
The Chief Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) said he heartily
endorsed all that Mr. Bonniface had said. If it would make the town a little
brighter, so much the better. People so far, since he had been there, had
behaved themselves. They had very few cases of drunkenness.
The Chairman: So far as you are concerned, you do not
raise any objection?
The Chief Constable: No, sir.
The Chairman said the applications with regard to those
three days were granted.
Folkestone
Express 10-2-1934
Annual Licensing Sessions
Wednesday, February 7th: Before Alderman
R.G. Wood, Dr. W.W. Nuttall, Mr. W. Smith, Mr. J.H. Blamey, Mr. F. Seager,
Councillor W. Hollands, and Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens.
The Chief Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) presented his
report as follows:- I have the honour to present my eleventh annual report
relating to the administration of the licensing laws within the borough for the
year ending 31st December, 1933.
Licensed Premises: There are 113 premises in the
borough licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquor, the number being made up
as follows: Full licences, 68; beer on, 7; beer off, 10; beer and spirit
dealers, 9; grocers, etc., off, 6; confectioners wine on, 5; cider and sweets,
off, 2; chemists wine off, 6; Total 113. (80 on and 33 off). This is a
chemist`s wine off licence less than the preceding year, no application having
been made for its renewal.
Alehouse Licences: Of the alehouse licences, one is a
six days` licence.
Occasional Licences: Thirty seven occasional licences
were granted to licence holders to sell intoxicating liquor other than on their
own licensed premises.
Extension of Licensing Hours: Eight hundred and ninety
nine extensions have been granted to licence holders within the borough when
dinners, etc., were being held on their licensed premises, and on the occasion
of public holidays. This is 395 more than the preceding year and is the highest
number on record for the borough. In spite of this, however, I am pleased to
report that in no case has any abuse of the privilege been recorded.
Alterations to Licensed Premises: Structural
alterations to licensed premises were sanctioned by the Bench during the year
as follows: 18th January, 1933, Guildhall Hotel; 12th
July, 1933, Foresters Arms; 12th July, 1933, Earl Grey.
Proceedings Against licence Holders: Two licence
holders were proceeded against during the year for committing breaches of the
Intoxicating Liquor Laws. One was fined 10s. for selling an unsealed bottle of
beer to a child under 14 years of age, and the other was fined £5 and £2 costs
for permitting his premises to be used for the purpose of betting by persons
resorting thereto. Two other licensees were cautioned by me; one for permitting
disorderly conduct on his premises, and the other for permitting drunkenness.
Drunkenness: During the year 23 persons (21 males and
two females) were proceeded against in the Borough Police Court for
drunkenness, and were dealt with as follows: Convicted, 13 males and 2 females.
Discharged, 8 males. The persons proceeded against were: Residents of
Folkestone, 8 males, 1 female; Non-residents, 5 males, 1 female; No fixed
abode, 8 males. The total proceedings for drunkenness show an increase of eight
as compared with the preceding year, when 11 persons were convicted and four
discharged.
Visits by Police to Licensed Premises: All licensed
premises have been periodically visited at irregular intervals by my officers
to see that they are being conducted in a satisfactory manner, and only one
adverse report has been submitted to me, which resulted in the licensee being
cautioned for permitting disorderly conduct on his premises. The total number
of visits made by the police was 1,434.
Permitted Hours: The permitted hours as allowed by the
Licensing Act of 1921 have been fixed by the Licensing Justices for this
Borough as under: Weekdays from 10.30 a.m. to 2.30 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 10
p.m.; Sundays from 12 noon to 2 p.m. and from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. On the 2nd
February, 1926, an extension of half an hour was granted by the Bench under the
provisions of Section 1 (1) of the Licensing Act, 1921 (from 10 p.m. to 10.30
p.m. on weekdays only) during the months of June, July, August and September.
This extension has been in force during the months mentioned every year since,
and I am pleased to say that no ill-effects have been observed. In this
connection I would draw your attention to the abstract attached.
Clubs: Eighteen clubs where intoxicating liquor is
supplied are registered under the Act. This is one club less than the preceding
year, The Associated Motor Owners` Society Club, of 10, Cheriton Gardens,
having closed down on the 18th March, 1933.
Hotels: six hotels and two restaurants have authority
under Section III of the Licensing Act, 1921, to supply intoxicating liquor
with meals for one hour after 10 p.m. an weekdays, namely: Royal Pavilion
Hotel, Grand Hotel, Majestic Hotel, Princes Hotel, Esplanade Hotel, Metropole
Hotel, Central Cafe and Savoy Cafe.
Music and Dancing: Forty nine licences for music and
dancing have been granted or renewed under the provisions of Part IV of the
Public Health (Amendment) Act, 1890. This is an increase of two as compared
with the previous year. Of this number, 18 are for the use of wireless for
public entertainment in licensed premises.
Billiards Licences: There is no change in the number of
billiards licences in the borough, three premises being licensed for this,
namely: The Queen`s Hall, Tontine Street, 24, Rendezvous Street, and the
Fishermen`s Institute, The Stade.
Conclusion: In conclusion I should like to express my
appreciation of the happy relations existing between the Bench and the Police
during the year under review, and for the valuable assistance and advice of
your Clerk, Mr. Charles Rootes, which is always unreservedly placed at my service.
The Chairman said that the Justices had had better
reports, but still that was a very good report. He thought that the licensees
had got through a year in Folkestone without any prosecution at all, when they
were able to carry out the liquor laws to the letter, but there had been two
cases during the past year, although one was more of a technical nature. They
would see from the report that in the past they had had less persons proceeded
against for drunkenness. They had had eight more than in the previous year, but
when they analysed it and found there were only nine residents of Folkestone
who had got into trouble during the whole of the year, he thought it spoke very
well of the people who lived there, and also of those thousands of visitors
they had in Folkestone in the summer, when only six of them got into trouble
with the police through having intoxicating liquor. On other points he thought
they perhaps had something to congratulate themselves, because more
applications had been made for extensions during the past year than ever before
– 395 more than the preceding year – and that was easily a record. The
Licensing Justices were always pleased to meet those applications, unless there
was some very strong reason as to why they should not be granted, but he
thought perhaps at that juncture he had better emphasise again that those
extensions, although granted by the Licensing Justices, were granted especially
for those persons who were attending the dinner, or ball, or dance, whatever it
might be, and not for the outside public. It was not intended that the outside
public should use those extensions to get intoxicating liquor after licensed
houses were closed. Eight years ago they tried an experiment when it was only
being tried in one or two places, of granting that extra half hour on weekdays
during the summer months. According to the Chief Constable there, no
ill-effects had been observed, and the Licensing Justices were still of the
opinion that that half hour was very useful to the licensees and to the
visitors to the town during the crowded months in the summer, and therefore
they had no regrets of having granted them.
It was then announced by the Chairman that the Justices
were going to renew the whole of the liquor licences under the same terms as
before. Other licences with regard to music and dancing and billiards were also
renewed.
The Justices fixed the date of Tuesday, 6th
March for the adjourned general annual licensing meeting.
Folkestone
Herald 10-2-1934
Annual Licensing Sessions
“Eight years ago we tried an experiment that had only
been tried in one or two places then, of granting an extra half hour on weekdays
during the summer months. No ill-effects have been observed, and the Licensing
Magistrates are still of the opinion that that half hour is very useful to the
licensees and residents the town during the crowded months of the summer.
Therefore, as we have no regrets of having granted it to you, we are going to
renew the whole of the liquor licences on the same terms as before”.
This very satisfactory statement on the sobriety of the
borough was made by the Chairman of the Licensing Magistrates (Alderman R.G.
Wood) at the Annual Licensing Sessions at the Town Hall on Wednesday. The other
Magistrates were Engineer Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, Mr. J.H. Blamey,
Councillor W. Hollands, Mr. F. Seager, Mr. W. Smith, and Dr. W.W. Nuttall.
The Chief Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) presented his
report (see Folkestone Express for details).
The Chairman of the Magistrates said the Licensing
Justices had listened to the report of the Chief Constable and they were agreed
that it was a good report. They had had better reports in one or two respects,
but it was still a very good report. He thought that in the past the licensees
had got through a whole year in Folkestone without any prosecution at all, and
had been able to carry out the liquor laws to the letter. There had been two
cases during the past year, although one was more of a technical nature. They
would also see that in past years they had had fewer persons proceeded against
for drunkenness. Last year there were eight more than in the previous year, but
when they found there were only nine residents of Folkestone who got into
trouble during the whole of the year, he thought it spoke very well of the
people who lived there, when they considered the tens of thousands of visitors
they had in the town during the summer, and then only six got into trouble with
the police owing to too much intoxicating liquor. Continuing, he said more
applications had been made for extensions than ever before. There had been 899,
and that was 595 more than the previous year. This was easily a record. The
Licensing Justices had always been pleased to grant those applications, unless
there was some very strong reason why they should not be granted. He thought he
had better emphasise again about those extensions that – although so generously
granted by the Licensing Magistrates – it must be understood that they were
granted especially for those persons who were attending the dinner, or ball, or
dance, or whatever the occasion was, and not for the outside public. It was not
intended that the outside public should use those extensions to get
intoxicating liquor after licensed houses were closed. That must be understood
and carried out. He believed it was. Alderman Wood concluded by referring to
the summer extensions, and announced that all the licences would be renewed.
It was decided to hold the adjourned general annual
licensing session on March 6th.
Folkestone
Express 24-3-1934
Local News
At the Folkestone Police Court on Tuesday an extension
was granted to the licence holders for an hour on each night on the Thursday
and Saturday previous to Easter, and on Easter Monday. Dr. W.W. Nuttall was in
the chair, and the other Magistrates on the Bench were Alderman T.S. Franks,
Mrs. E. Gore, Mrs. F. Seager, and Judge H. Terrell, K.C.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface, in making the application on behalf
of a number licensed victuallers, said the extension they sought was from 10
p.m. to 11 p.m. on the Thursday before Good Friday, the Saturday before Easter
Sunday, and Easter Monday. Thursday night was included in that application for
the first time, and it was for the reason that the customers of his clients had
asked that it should be included. The Easter holidays really commenced on
Thursday afternoon, when they got the influx of visitors who stayed until
Monday. It was for those visitors that the application was made. It was not an
unusual application, for a similar one was made at Hove the previous day and
was granted. He asked the Magistrates with all confidence to grant the
extension. The number of applicants were 56, which left only eleven
outstanding, but one who lived on the outskirts of town stated frankly that he
did not want it. The large hotels were not included in that application.
The Magistrates` Clerk (Mr. C. Rootes) to Chief
Inspector Pittock: An application was granted last year?
Chief Inspector Pittock: Only for Saturday and Monday.
The Chairman: Can you tell us how it was respected?
Chief Inspector Pittock: No irregularities were
detected by the police last year as a result of the extension.
The Chairman: Do you oppose this application?
Chief Inspector Pittock: No, sir.
The Chairman: The application is granted.
Folkestone
Herald 5-5-1934
Editorial
A decision of the High Court recently that an extension
of half an hour during the summer months at seaside resorts is illegal has
thrown Licensing Magistrates and licensees into a quandary, and there is a
strong feeling amongst the general public that immediate action should be taken
by Parliament to remedy the matter. Folkestone, like many other seaside
resorts, has enjoyed the undoubted advantage of a half hour extension of
licensing hours during the months of June, July, August and September, and
there is ample justification for the statement that the privilege granted by
the Licensing Magistrates has not been abused locally; on the contrary,
visitors appreciate the concession and are glad of the relaxation of the usual
stringent regulations. There is talk of submitting the High Court decision to
the test of the Appeal Court, but if this is so, some time must elapse before
an appeal could be heard. The exact position of Licensing Benches is at the
moment obscure. In some quarters the opinion is expressed that Magistrates who
grant the extra half hour this year will not be called upon to reverse their
decision unless an appeal is made against the specific Bench. If this is so,
will not the Magistrates be in a peculiar position, having regard to the clear
decision of a higher Court? Certainly it will be open to any bitter opponent of
the liquor trade to challenge the Magistrates` decision and to take the matter
to the High Court forthwith. It seems to us that Parliamentary action is the
only solution of the present complex situation. The future decisions of Benches
of Magistrates in granting half hour extensions for the summer months would
thereby be legalised and the present uncertainty removed. There can be no
question of the opinion of the holiday public upon the matter. The extension is
definitely needed in seaside resorts.
Folkestone
Express 12-5-1934
Local News
On Friday, the Folkestone Magistrates, Mr. R.G. Wood,
Eng. Rear Admiral L.J. Stephens, and Councillor W. Hollands, granted an
application to 65 licensees, who are members of the Licensed Victuallers`
Association in the extended borough, for an extension of one hour on the night
of Saturday previous to Whit Sunday and on Whit Monday.
Mr. B.H. Bonniface (Messrs. G.W. Haines), in making the
application, said the Magistrates had granted a similar request in previous
years, when they had taken into consideration the number of visitors who came
to Folkestone. That year they were going to be honoured with the conference of
the League of Nations Union, and that was the first occasion that conference
was being held in England. If they could show to those foreign delegates who
were coming that they were, to the best of their ability, throwing off
restrictions, they should show it to them.
The Chairman: What have the police to say with regard
to the previous extensions?
Chief Inspector Pittock: There were no ill-effects
noticed.
The Chairman: Is there any opposition from your
department? Are you instructed to oppose the application in any way?
Chief Inspector Pittock: No. Sir.
The Chairman, to Mr. Bonniface: You are applying for 65
licensees?
Mr. Bonniface: Yes, sir. That number includes the whole
of the members of the Association. There are only six non-members of the
Association who hold licences, but I do not apply for the extension for them.
The Chairman said the application was granted.
Folkestone
Herald 19-5-1934
Editorial
The Home Secretary, Sir John Gilmour, announced in the
House of Commons this week that a Bill is to be introduced by the Government as
soon as possible after Whitsun to enable an extension of permitted hours during
the summer months from 10 to 10.30, at the discretion of the Justices. The
position, however, appears to be no more clear today than it was a fortnight
ago, when by the decision of the High Court it was held to be illegal to allow
an extension of permitted hours for a portion of the year. In reply to a
question in the House of Commons, the Home Secretary stated he “had no
authority to give any ruling on the point as to whether the High Court decision
only applied to one particular case or to the 120 other orders issued by
Licensing Justices in all parts of the country”. The Home Secretary further
stated that the advice given to him was that similar orders made by Licensing
Benches in other districts were not automatically rendered inoperative. The
Folkestone Licensing Magistrates have already granted an extension for this
summer. It seems reasonably certain that a Bill to legalise the position would
pass through the Commons without serious opposition. So far as seaside resorts
are concerned, as we have said on previous occasions, the extension of licences
during the summer months is a necessity, and in the past has been greatly
appreciated by visitors to the town. So far as can be ascertained, the
extension of hours over the four summer months has not resulted in an
appreciable increase of drunkenness, or indeed in increased consumption of
drink. The relaxation of the very stringent licensing laws during the summer
enables visitors to enjoy a freedom and an amenity which is not available at
other times of the year, and that it is appreciated is obvious by the number of
applications which are made to Benches all over the country at this time of the
year. The increasing number of foreign visitors to this country also appreciate
the concession. The licensed trade naturally appreciates the extra half hour,
and its members have shown themselves in the past to be anxious to allow no
breaches of the law which would cause any withdrawal of the concession. It is
hoped that the Bill will pass all its readings in order that the extension may
be made during the months of June, July, August and September.
Folkestone
Herald 15-12-1934
Local News
The Folkestone Licensing Magistrates on Tuesday granted
an application for the extension of the drinking hours from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m.
on Saturday, December 22nd, Monday, December 24th, Boxing
Day, and New Year`s Eve.
The application was made by Mr. B.H. Bonniface on
behalf of 69 licensees in the form granted. He said the application was a
little different from last year, because he was including the Saturday before
Christmas, and he was doing that for the reason that it was expected many
people not in business would be arriving for the Christmas holidays on
Saturday. It was probable that many of them would do a lot of their shopping in
the town on the Saturday and Christmas Eve. A similar application had been
granted at Dymchurch.
The Chairman (Mr. R.G. Wood): The members of the
Association think they have good grounds for asking for the Saturday night?
Mr. Bonniface: Yes.
And they believe there will be many extra people in the
town on Saturday? – Yes.
The Clerk (Mr. C. Rootes) asked how the police viewed
the application.
The Chief Constable (Mr. A.S. Beesley) said there was
the question of the convenience of the public. The police did not object.
The Chairman remarked that the application was on
behalf of 69. Any licensees not included would have to make separate applications
to the Magistrates.
Mr. Bonniface said the number included all but four.
The Chairman: We shall grant the application, not
because Dymchurch has done so, but because we feel you have a reasonable ground
for making it.
A similar application was made by another licensee and
was granted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
loading..